The Semantic Similarity Effect on Short-Term Memory: Null Effects of Affectively Defined Semantic Similarity

Q1 Psychology
S. Ishiguro, Satoru Saito
{"title":"The Semantic Similarity Effect on Short-Term Memory: Null Effects of Affectively Defined Semantic Similarity","authors":"S. Ishiguro, Satoru Saito","doi":"10.5334/joc.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on short-term memory have repeatedly demonstrated the beneficial effect of semantic similarity. Although the effect seems robust, the aspects of semantics targeted by these studies (e.g., categorical structure, associative relationship, or dimension of meaning) should be clarified. A recent meta-regression study inspired by Osgood’s view, which highlights affective dimensions in semantics, introduced a novel index for quantifying semantic similarity using affective values. Building on the results of the meta-regression of past studies’ data with that index, this study predicts that semantic similarity is deleterious to short-term memory if it is manipulated by affective dimensions, after controlling for other confounding factors. This prediction was directly tested. The experimental results of the immediate serial recall task (Study 1) and immediate serial reconstruction of order task (Study 2) indicated null effects of semantic similarity by affective dimensions and thus falsified the prediction. These results suggest that semantic similarity based on affective dimensions is negligible.","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"76 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on short-term memory have repeatedly demonstrated the beneficial effect of semantic similarity. Although the effect seems robust, the aspects of semantics targeted by these studies (e.g., categorical structure, associative relationship, or dimension of meaning) should be clarified. A recent meta-regression study inspired by Osgood’s view, which highlights affective dimensions in semantics, introduced a novel index for quantifying semantic similarity using affective values. Building on the results of the meta-regression of past studies’ data with that index, this study predicts that semantic similarity is deleterious to short-term memory if it is manipulated by affective dimensions, after controlling for other confounding factors. This prediction was directly tested. The experimental results of the immediate serial recall task (Study 1) and immediate serial reconstruction of order task (Study 2) indicated null effects of semantic similarity by affective dimensions and thus falsified the prediction. These results suggest that semantic similarity based on affective dimensions is negligible.
语义相似性对短时记忆的影响:情感定义的语义相似性的无效效应
有关短时记忆的研究反复证明了语义相似性的有益效果。虽然这种效果似乎很稳健,但这些研究针对的语义方面(如分类结构、联想关系或意义维度)应该得到澄清。最近的一项元回归研究受 Osgood 观点的启发,强调了语义学中的情感维度,并引入了一种使用情感值量化语义相似性的新指数。本研究以该指数对过去研究数据的元回归结果为基础,预测在控制了其他混杂因素后,如果语义相似性受到情感维度的操纵,则会对短时记忆产生有害影响。这一预测得到了直接验证。即时序列回忆任务(研究 1)和即时序列顺序重构任务(研究 2)的实验结果表明,情感维度对语义相似性的影响为零,从而证伪了这一预测。这些结果表明,基于情感维度的语义相似性可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信