A Novel Application of Non-linear Dynamics Investigating Cognitive Workload and Situational Trust in Highly Automated Vehicles

Emily Parcell, Sidney T. Scott-Sharoni, Nadia Fereydooni, Bruce N. Walker, John K. Lenneman, Benjamin P. Austin, Takeshi Yoshida
{"title":"A Novel Application of Non-linear Dynamics Investigating Cognitive Workload and Situational Trust in Highly Automated Vehicles","authors":"Emily Parcell, Sidney T. Scott-Sharoni, Nadia Fereydooni, Bruce N. Walker, John K. Lenneman, Benjamin P. Austin, Takeshi Yoshida","doi":"10.1177/10711813241228178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vehicles with driving automation are becoming increasingly present despite the reported apprehension of potential consumers. The potential benefits, such as fewer crashes, lighter traffic, and increased transportation access, give merit in researching how to engender appropriate human- automation interaction that will ensure a smoother adoption of the technology. One method involves investigating how users receive information about the vehicle. Using a simulated highly automated vehicle, researchers examined how content temporality and modality affected the situational trust and cognitive workload of 36 participants using subjective measures and 15 participants using non-linear dynamics. Researchers found only one significant main effect of temporality on workload; however, post-hoc comparisons between groups were insignificant. Nevertheless, applying non-linear dynamics to driving research is a novel and underutilized approach. Researchers, designers, and users may benefit from using real-time measures rather than aggregate scores to understand how driver behavior changes based on the environment.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241228178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vehicles with driving automation are becoming increasingly present despite the reported apprehension of potential consumers. The potential benefits, such as fewer crashes, lighter traffic, and increased transportation access, give merit in researching how to engender appropriate human- automation interaction that will ensure a smoother adoption of the technology. One method involves investigating how users receive information about the vehicle. Using a simulated highly automated vehicle, researchers examined how content temporality and modality affected the situational trust and cognitive workload of 36 participants using subjective measures and 15 participants using non-linear dynamics. Researchers found only one significant main effect of temporality on workload; however, post-hoc comparisons between groups were insignificant. Nevertheless, applying non-linear dynamics to driving research is a novel and underutilized approach. Researchers, designers, and users may benefit from using real-time measures rather than aggregate scores to understand how driver behavior changes based on the environment.
非线性动力学的新应用:调查高度自动驾驶汽车的认知工作量和情景信任度
尽管有报道称潜在消费者对自动驾驶汽车心存疑虑,但自动驾驶汽车正日益普及。潜在的好处,如减少碰撞、减轻交通压力、增加交通便利性等,都值得研究如何建立适当的人机交互,以确保该技术更顺利地得到采用。其中一种方法是研究用户如何接收车辆信息。研究人员使用模拟的高度自动驾驶车辆,通过主观测量方法研究了内容的时间性和模式如何影响 36 名参与者的情景信任度和认知工作量,并使用非线性动力学方法研究了 15 名参与者的情况。研究人员发现,时间性对工作量只有一个显著的主效应;但是,组间的事后比较结果并不显著。不过,将非线性动力学应用于驾驶研究是一种新颖且未得到充分利用的方法。研究人员、设计人员和用户可能会受益于使用实时测量而不是综合评分来了解驾驶员的行为是如何根据环境发生变化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信