Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Marina Pi-Ruano , Javier Roca , Pilar Tejero
{"title":"Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving","authors":"Marina Pi-Ruano ,&nbsp;Javier Roca ,&nbsp;Pilar Tejero","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction</em>: Highly automated driving is expected to reduce the accident risk occurrence by human errors, but it can also increase driver distraction. Previous evidence shows that auditory signals can help drivers take over in critical situations. However, it is still uncertain whether the potential benefit of verbal auditory signals could be generalized to driving situations where drivers are visually and auditorily distracted. <em>Method:</em> Our first objective was to compare the effectiveness of complementary audio messages (audio + visual condition) and visual only (visual condition) variable message signs (VMS) messages. The second objective was to explore the potential use of oral messages with traffic information to help highly-automated vehicle drivers identify critical situations. Eye-tracking data were also registered. Twenty-four volunteers participated in a driving simulator study, completing two tasks: (a) a TV series task, where they had to pay attention to an episode of a TV series while traveling along the route; and (b) a VMS task, where they had to recover the manual control of the car if the VMS message was a ‘critical message.’ <em>Results:</em> General results showed that, when the audio was available, the participants: (a) had a higher ability to discriminate the VMS messages, (b) were less conservative, (c) responded earlier, and (d) their pattern of fixations was more efficient. A complementary analysis showed that the counterbalance order was a moderating factor for the discrimination ability and the response distance measures. This evidence suggests a potential learning effect, not cancelled by counterbalancing the order of the conditions. <em>Conclusion:</em> The processing of traffic messages may improve when provided as oral and visual messages. <em>Practical Applications:</em> These results would be of special interest for engineers designing highly automated cars, considering that the design of automated systems must ensure that the driver's attention is sufficient to take over control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000148/pdfft?md5=0e9eba6ae58236b9ef4dea21fe7a7bc9&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524000148-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Highly automated driving is expected to reduce the accident risk occurrence by human errors, but it can also increase driver distraction. Previous evidence shows that auditory signals can help drivers take over in critical situations. However, it is still uncertain whether the potential benefit of verbal auditory signals could be generalized to driving situations where drivers are visually and auditorily distracted. Method: Our first objective was to compare the effectiveness of complementary audio messages (audio + visual condition) and visual only (visual condition) variable message signs (VMS) messages. The second objective was to explore the potential use of oral messages with traffic information to help highly-automated vehicle drivers identify critical situations. Eye-tracking data were also registered. Twenty-four volunteers participated in a driving simulator study, completing two tasks: (a) a TV series task, where they had to pay attention to an episode of a TV series while traveling along the route; and (b) a VMS task, where they had to recover the manual control of the car if the VMS message was a ‘critical message.’ Results: General results showed that, when the audio was available, the participants: (a) had a higher ability to discriminate the VMS messages, (b) were less conservative, (c) responded earlier, and (d) their pattern of fixations was more efficient. A complementary analysis showed that the counterbalance order was a moderating factor for the discrimination ability and the response distance measures. This evidence suggests a potential learning effect, not cancelled by counterbalancing the order of the conditions. Conclusion: The processing of traffic messages may improve when provided as oral and visual messages. Practical Applications: These results would be of special interest for engineers designing highly automated cars, considering that the design of automated systems must ensure that the driver's attention is sufficient to take over control.

可变信息标志的视听演示改善了部分自动驾驶过程中分心驾驶员的信息处理能力
引言高度自动驾驶有望降低人为失误造成的事故风险,但也会增加驾驶员的分心。以往的证据表明,听觉信号可以帮助驾驶员在危急情况下接管驾驶。然而,口头听觉信号的潜在益处能否推广到驾驶员视觉和听觉分心的驾驶环境中,目前仍不确定。方法:我们的第一个目标是比较补充音频信息(音频+视觉条件)和仅视觉(视觉条件)可变信息标志(VMS)信息的有效性。第二个目标是探索口头信息与交通信息的潜在用途,以帮助高度自动化的车辆驾驶员识别危急情况。同时还记录了眼动跟踪数据。24 名志愿者参加了驾驶模拟器研究,并完成了两项任务:(a) 电视连续剧任务,他们必须在沿路行驶时关注一集电视连续剧;(b) VMS 任务,如果 VMS 信息是 "关键信息",他们必须恢复对汽车的手动控制。结果:总体结果显示,在有音频的情况下,受试者:(a) 对 VMS 信息的分辨能力更强;(b) 不那么保守;(c) 更早做出反应;(d) 固定模式更有效率。补充分析表明,平衡顺序是分辨能力和反应距离测量的调节因素。这一证据表明,潜在的学习效应并没有被平衡条件的顺序所抵消。结论以口头和视觉信息的形式提供交通信息时,可以提高对交通信息的处理能力。实际应用:考虑到自动驾驶系统的设计必须确保驾驶员有足够的注意力来接管控制权,这些结果对于设计高度自动驾驶汽车的工程师来说具有特殊意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信