SUEZ CANAL: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON ALTERNATIVE TRADE ROUTES

Pedro Alexandre Ranzan, Tatiane Pellin Cislaghi, Elieti Biques Fernandes
{"title":"SUEZ CANAL: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON ALTERNATIVE TRADE ROUTES","authors":"Pedro Alexandre Ranzan, Tatiane Pellin Cislaghi, Elieti Biques Fernandes","doi":"10.18568/internext.v19i1.758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This research aimed to analyze the main alternative routes to Suez Canal Route (SCR): North Sea Route (NSR) and Trans-Siberian Route (TSR). Method: A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out using the Web of Science (WoS) database. Forty-eight related articles were found, of which 16 remained for further analysis after refinement. Main Results: It was identified that the TSR and NSR routes are economically viable compared to the SCR, given certain specific conditions, and that the railway mode is less studied in relation to the maritime mode. Relevance / Originality: Possible alternative trade routes for the transportation of goods, both via maritime and railway modes, were identified, with the highlighting of advantages and disadvantages. Theoretical / Methodological Contributions: The study is relevant for the international logistics field, since, by analyzing each transport mode, it was possible to highlight issues that need to be further explored in relation to existing routes. Social / Management Contributions: This study contributed to determining TSR as the most cost-effective route according to the articles analyzed in the SLR. It also clarified issues such as prices, costs, distances, advantages and disadvantages, sustainability issues, as well as updated data from other studies.","PeriodicalId":476397,"journal":{"name":"Internext","volume":"82 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internext","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v19i1.758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This research aimed to analyze the main alternative routes to Suez Canal Route (SCR): North Sea Route (NSR) and Trans-Siberian Route (TSR). Method: A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out using the Web of Science (WoS) database. Forty-eight related articles were found, of which 16 remained for further analysis after refinement. Main Results: It was identified that the TSR and NSR routes are economically viable compared to the SCR, given certain specific conditions, and that the railway mode is less studied in relation to the maritime mode. Relevance / Originality: Possible alternative trade routes for the transportation of goods, both via maritime and railway modes, were identified, with the highlighting of advantages and disadvantages. Theoretical / Methodological Contributions: The study is relevant for the international logistics field, since, by analyzing each transport mode, it was possible to highlight issues that need to be further explored in relation to existing routes. Social / Management Contributions: This study contributed to determining TSR as the most cost-effective route according to the articles analyzed in the SLR. It also clarified issues such as prices, costs, distances, advantages and disadvantages, sustainability issues, as well as updated data from other studies.
苏伊士运河:关于替代贸易路线的探索性研究
研究目的本研究旨在分析苏伊士运河路线(SCR)的主要替代路线:北海航线(NSR)和跨西伯利亚航线(TSR)。研究方法:利用科学网(WoS)数据库进行了系统文献综述(SLR)。发现了 48 篇相关文章,其中 16 篇在完善后有待进一步分析。主要结果:研究发现,在某些特定条件下,与南部通道相比,南部通道(TSR)和北部通道(NSR)在经济上是可行的,而且与海运方式相比,对铁路方式的研究较少。相关性/原创性:确定了通过海运和铁路模式运输货物的可能替代贸易路线,并强调了其优缺点。理论/方法论贡献:这项研究对国际物流领域具有现实意义,因为通过分析每种运输方式,可以突出与现有路线有关的需要进一步探讨的问题。社会/管理贡献:根据 SLR 分析的文章,本研究有助于确定 TSR 是最具成本效益的路线。它还澄清了价格、成本、距离、优缺点、可持续性等问题,并更新了其他研究的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信