COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A survey of unvaccinated adults

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
T. Gengiah, Donavan C. Naidoo, Nomcebo Maduma, Saien Govender, Sherishka Dhindayal, Lara Lewis
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A survey of unvaccinated adults","authors":"T. Gengiah, Donavan C. Naidoo, Nomcebo Maduma, Saien Govender, Sherishka Dhindayal, Lara Lewis","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Concerns and misconceptions surrounding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may account for vaccine hesitancy and low uptake.Aim: To determine prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, vaccine-related misconceptions, and predictors of vaccine hesitancy among South Africans.Setting: Community setting in five districts in KwaZulu- Natal province.Methods: Between August 20, 2021, and September 27, 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey, interviewing 300 unvaccinated adults amid the national vaccination campaign. Predictors of hesitancy were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: Participants had a median age of 29 years (IQR: 23–39), 86.7% were Black African, 63.2% were male, 53.3% resided in rural communities, and 59.3% (95% CI: 53.8% – 64.9%) were classified as vaccine hesitant. The primary reason for not vaccinating was a lack of trust in the vaccine (62.1%). Factors associated with reduced vaccine hesitancy included age (participants aged 35–49 years: OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18–0.64, p = 0.003; participants over 50 years: OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.47, p = 0.0004), previous COVID-19 infection (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.87, p = 0.03), and receiving vaccine information from healthcare workers (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.10–1.0, p = 0.05). Unemployed (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.1–4.2, p = 0.03) and self-employed individuals (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.27–7.02, p = 0.01) were more likely to be vaccine hesitant.Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rates are high in KwaZulu-Natal. Uptake could be enhanced by healthcare workers leading information campaigns with messages targeting younger individuals, the unemployed, and the self-employed.Contribution: This survey provides evidence to improve COVID-19 vaccination uptake in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Concerns and misconceptions surrounding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may account for vaccine hesitancy and low uptake.Aim: To determine prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, vaccine-related misconceptions, and predictors of vaccine hesitancy among South Africans.Setting: Community setting in five districts in KwaZulu- Natal province.Methods: Between August 20, 2021, and September 27, 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey, interviewing 300 unvaccinated adults amid the national vaccination campaign. Predictors of hesitancy were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: Participants had a median age of 29 years (IQR: 23–39), 86.7% were Black African, 63.2% were male, 53.3% resided in rural communities, and 59.3% (95% CI: 53.8% – 64.9%) were classified as vaccine hesitant. The primary reason for not vaccinating was a lack of trust in the vaccine (62.1%). Factors associated with reduced vaccine hesitancy included age (participants aged 35–49 years: OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18–0.64, p = 0.003; participants over 50 years: OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.47, p = 0.0004), previous COVID-19 infection (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.87, p = 0.03), and receiving vaccine information from healthcare workers (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.10–1.0, p = 0.05). Unemployed (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.1–4.2, p = 0.03) and self-employed individuals (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.27–7.02, p = 0.01) were more likely to be vaccine hesitant.Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rates are high in KwaZulu-Natal. Uptake could be enhanced by healthcare workers leading information campaigns with messages targeting younger individuals, the unemployed, and the self-employed.Contribution: This survey provides evidence to improve COVID-19 vaccination uptake in South Africa.
南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫态度:对未接种疫苗成年人的调查
背景:目的:确定南非人对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗犹豫不决的普遍程度、与疫苗相关的误解以及疫苗犹豫不决的预测因素:环境:夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省五个地区的社区环境:2021年8月20日至2021年9月27日期间,我们进行了一次横断面调查,在全国疫苗接种活动中采访了300名未接种疫苗的成年人。通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定了犹豫不决的预测因素:参与者的年龄中位数为 29 岁(IQR:23-39),86.7% 为非洲黑人,63.2% 为男性,53.3% 居住在农村社区,59.3%(95% CI:53.8% - 64.9%)被归类为疫苗犹豫不决者。不接种的主要原因是对疫苗缺乏信任(62.1%)。与疫苗接种犹豫减少相关的因素包括年龄(35-49 岁的参与者:OR:0.28,95% CI:0.18-0.64,p = 0.003;50 岁以上的参与者:OR:0.18,95% CI:0.07-0.47,p = 0.0004),曾感染 COVID-19(OR:0.31,95% CI:0.11-0.87,p = 0.03),从医护人员处获得疫苗信息(OR:0.32,95% CI:0.10-1.0,p = 0.05)。失业者(OR:2.14,95% CI:1.1-4.2,p = 0.03)和自营职业者(OR:2.98,95% CI:1.27-7.02,p = 0.01)更有可能对疫苗犹豫不决:结论:COVID-19疫苗在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的犹豫率很高。医护人员可以针对年轻人、失业者和自营职业者开展宣传活动,从而提高疫苗的接种率:贡献:这项调查为提高南非的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信