Experimental feasibility study of using eco- and user-friendly mechanochemically activated slag/fly ash geopolymer for soil stabilization

Mukhtar Hamid Abed , Firas Hamid Abed , Seyed Alireza Zareei , Israa Sabbar Abbas , Hanifi Canakci , Nahidh H. Kurdi , Alireza Emami
{"title":"Experimental feasibility study of using eco- and user-friendly mechanochemically activated slag/fly ash geopolymer for soil stabilization","authors":"Mukhtar Hamid Abed ,&nbsp;Firas Hamid Abed ,&nbsp;Seyed Alireza Zareei ,&nbsp;Israa Sabbar Abbas ,&nbsp;Hanifi Canakci ,&nbsp;Nahidh H. Kurdi ,&nbsp;Alireza Emami","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2024.100226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study focuses on the development of eco and user-friendly mechanochemically-activated geopolymeric stabilizers, surpassing the limitations inherent in traditional geopolymerization methods. A comparative analysis was undertaken with conventionally activated geopolymer stabilizers to establish benchmarks for effectiveness in soil stabilization applications. Additionally, the research delves into the impact of granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) content on the mechanical and durability properties of stabilized soil samples. In addition, the investigation focuses on the influence of the activation method on soil effectiveness and strength post-exposure to sulfate attack. The durability performance is rigorously assessed through the immersion of specimens in a 1 % magnesium sulfate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) solution for 60 and 120 days. The comprehensive evaluation includes visual appearance, mass changes, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), and Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of geopolymer-stabilized soil specimens. The results showed that before the exposure to the MgSO<sub>4</sub> solution, the UCS of mechanochemically activated geopolymer (MAG) samples was higher (12–45 %) than that of conventionally activated geopolymer (CAG)-stabilized soil. Furthermore, the strength of the geopolymer-stabilized soil improved by 114 %, 247 %, and 361 %, at 50, 75, and 100 % GGBS content, respectively. On the other hand, after exposure to the MgSO<sub>4</sub> solution, the results showed that the mechanochemically activated geopolymer-stabilized soil has better resistance to sulfate erosion than the conventionally activated geopolymer-stabilized soil. The residual UCS for MAG and CAG samples were 93 % and 89 % when exposed to 1 % magnesium sulfate solution for 60 days, whereas they declined to 70 % and 58 %, respectively, after 120 days of immersion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397624000108/pdfft?md5=a8a6d481806b639c0510cb9549414a7c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772397624000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397624000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the development of eco and user-friendly mechanochemically-activated geopolymeric stabilizers, surpassing the limitations inherent in traditional geopolymerization methods. A comparative analysis was undertaken with conventionally activated geopolymer stabilizers to establish benchmarks for effectiveness in soil stabilization applications. Additionally, the research delves into the impact of granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) content on the mechanical and durability properties of stabilized soil samples. In addition, the investigation focuses on the influence of the activation method on soil effectiveness and strength post-exposure to sulfate attack. The durability performance is rigorously assessed through the immersion of specimens in a 1 % magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) solution for 60 and 120 days. The comprehensive evaluation includes visual appearance, mass changes, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), and Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of geopolymer-stabilized soil specimens. The results showed that before the exposure to the MgSO4 solution, the UCS of mechanochemically activated geopolymer (MAG) samples was higher (12–45 %) than that of conventionally activated geopolymer (CAG)-stabilized soil. Furthermore, the strength of the geopolymer-stabilized soil improved by 114 %, 247 %, and 361 %, at 50, 75, and 100 % GGBS content, respectively. On the other hand, after exposure to the MgSO4 solution, the results showed that the mechanochemically activated geopolymer-stabilized soil has better resistance to sulfate erosion than the conventionally activated geopolymer-stabilized soil. The residual UCS for MAG and CAG samples were 93 % and 89 % when exposed to 1 % magnesium sulfate solution for 60 days, whereas they declined to 70 % and 58 %, respectively, after 120 days of immersion.

用于稳定土壤的生态和用户友好型机械化学活化炉渣/粉煤灰土工聚合物的实验可行性研究
本研究的重点是开发环保、方便使用的机械化学活化土工聚合物稳定剂,以超越传统土工聚合方法固有的局限性。研究人员对传统活化土工聚合物稳定剂进行了比较分析,以确定其在土壤稳定应用中的有效性基准。此外,研究还深入探讨了粒化高炉矿渣(GGBS)含量对稳定土壤样本的机械和耐久性能的影响。此外,研究还重点关注了活化方法对暴露于硫酸盐侵蚀后土壤有效性和强度的影响。通过将试样浸泡在 1% 的硫酸镁(MgSO4)溶液中 60 天和 120 天,对耐久性能进行了严格评估。综合评估包括土工聚合物稳定土试样的外观、质量变化、超声波脉冲速度(UPV)、非收缩压缩强度(UCS)和傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)。结果表明,在暴露于 MgSO4 溶液之前,机械化学活化土工聚合物 (MAG) 样品的 UCS 比传统活化土工聚合物 (CAG) 稳定土壤的 UCS 高(12-45%)。此外,土工聚合物稳定土壤的强度在 GGBS 含量为 50%、75% 和 100% 时分别提高了 114%、247% 和 361%。另一方面,在暴露于 MgSO4 溶液后,结果表明机械化学活化的土工聚合物稳定土比传统活化的土工聚合物稳定土具有更好的抗硫酸盐侵蚀能力。MAG 样品和 CAG 样品在 1% 的硫酸镁溶液中浸泡 60 天后,UCS 的残留量分别为 93% 和 89%,而在浸泡 120 天后,UCS 的残留量分别降至 70% 和 58%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信