Parental Recognition of Double Reduction Policy,Family Economic Status And Educational Anxiety: Exploring the Mediating Influence of Educational Technology Substitutive Resource

Ping Ren, Zhiqiang Zhao
{"title":"Parental Recognition of Double Reduction Policy,Family Economic Status And Educational Anxiety: Exploring the Mediating Influence of Educational Technology Substitutive Resource","authors":"Ping Ren, Zhiqiang Zhao","doi":"10.58195/emi.v3i1.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China's double reduction policy, aiming to curb excessive extracurricular tutoring, sparks debate and concerns among parents about its impact on the next generation's academics and competitiveness. Some forward-thinking parents seek alternatives like one-on-one tutoring or paid online learning, yet financial constraints intensify anxiety, especially for economically disadvantaged families. A study involving 200 parents examines their views on policy implementation, family economic status, and the role of alternative resources in educational anxiety. Findings highlight that the stronger the implementation of the double reduction policy in a region, the higher the parental education anxiety becomes. Parents with poorer economic conditions are more hesitant than those with better economic status when it comes to choosing to use paid alternative educational resources. The government and society should explore measures to ensure equitable access to education and alleviate anxiety. Additionally, establishing a dynamic tracking and feedback system for the double reduction policy is essential, actively seeking input from parents to better serve their needs and align educational policies with national education goals.","PeriodicalId":294362,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Management Information","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Management Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58195/emi.v3i1.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's double reduction policy, aiming to curb excessive extracurricular tutoring, sparks debate and concerns among parents about its impact on the next generation's academics and competitiveness. Some forward-thinking parents seek alternatives like one-on-one tutoring or paid online learning, yet financial constraints intensify anxiety, especially for economically disadvantaged families. A study involving 200 parents examines their views on policy implementation, family economic status, and the role of alternative resources in educational anxiety. Findings highlight that the stronger the implementation of the double reduction policy in a region, the higher the parental education anxiety becomes. Parents with poorer economic conditions are more hesitant than those with better economic status when it comes to choosing to use paid alternative educational resources. The government and society should explore measures to ensure equitable access to education and alleviate anxiety. Additionally, establishing a dynamic tracking and feedback system for the double reduction policy is essential, actively seeking input from parents to better serve their needs and align educational policies with national education goals.
双减政策的家长认可度,家庭经济状况与教育焦虑:探索教育技术替代资源的中介影响
中国的双减政策旨在遏制过度的课外辅导,引发了家长们对双减政策对下一代学业和竞争力影响的讨论和担忧。一些有远见的家长寻求一对一辅导或付费在线学习等替代方案,但经济拮据加剧了他们的焦虑,尤其是经济条件较差的家庭。一项涉及 200 名家长的研究考察了他们对政策实施、家庭经济状况以及替代资源在教育焦虑中的作用的看法。研究结果表明,一个地区双减政策的实施力度越大,家长的教育焦虑就越高。与经济状况较好的家长相比,经济状况较差的家长在选择使用有偿替代教育资源时更为犹豫。政府和社会应探索措施,确保教育机会公平,缓解焦虑。此外,建立双减政策的动态跟踪和反馈系统至关重要,应积极征求家长的意见,以更好地满足家长的需求,使教育政策与国家教育目标保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信