Scaffolding Summary Writing through the ‘Reading to Learn’ Pedagogy

IF 3.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Huifang Li, Ingrid Wijeyewardene, Susan Stackhouse
{"title":"Scaffolding Summary Writing through the ‘Reading to Learn’ Pedagogy","authors":"Huifang Li, Ingrid Wijeyewardene, Susan Stackhouse","doi":"10.1177/00336882231226281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary writing is a core competency for students pursuing university studies, but the demands of the reading-to-writing process can be fraught for those students new to the university context, particularly international students for whom English is an additional language. This paper reports on a study that investigated the effectiveness of using the Reading to Learn (R2L) pedagogy for students’ summary writing in an online environment. International English as an additional language students enrolled in four separate iterations of an advanced academic literacy unit offered by an Australian university, and were taught academic reading and summary writing online using the R2L pedagogy. Pre- and post-tests were administered in the first and last weeks of the unit each trimester. In the weeks between the tests, tutorials (2 h×9 weeks) consisted of structured and scaffolded teacher–student interactions, which guided the students through reading and summarising and moved from a high level of teacher input to greater student independence in the reading-to-writing process. Results found significant improvement in students’ abilities to comprehend and summarise key ideas from a source text and to write grammatically sound and complex sentences. However, the instruction did not show any impact on cohesion, vocabulary or punctuation. Despite the limitations of the study, the results confirm previous results as to the value of R2L, which provides a scaffolded approach to reading and writing.","PeriodicalId":46946,"journal":{"name":"Relc Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relc Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231226281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary writing is a core competency for students pursuing university studies, but the demands of the reading-to-writing process can be fraught for those students new to the university context, particularly international students for whom English is an additional language. This paper reports on a study that investigated the effectiveness of using the Reading to Learn (R2L) pedagogy for students’ summary writing in an online environment. International English as an additional language students enrolled in four separate iterations of an advanced academic literacy unit offered by an Australian university, and were taught academic reading and summary writing online using the R2L pedagogy. Pre- and post-tests were administered in the first and last weeks of the unit each trimester. In the weeks between the tests, tutorials (2 h×9 weeks) consisted of structured and scaffolded teacher–student interactions, which guided the students through reading and summarising and moved from a high level of teacher input to greater student independence in the reading-to-writing process. Results found significant improvement in students’ abilities to comprehend and summarise key ideas from a source text and to write grammatically sound and complex sentences. However, the instruction did not show any impact on cohesion, vocabulary or punctuation. Despite the limitations of the study, the results confirm previous results as to the value of R2L, which provides a scaffolded approach to reading and writing.
通过 "以读促学 "教学法为摘要写作搭建支架
摘要写作是大学生学习的一项核心能力,但对于那些刚进入大学的学生,尤其是英语作为一门额外语言的留学生来说,从阅读到写作的过程可能会充满挑战。本文报告了一项研究,该研究调查了在网络环境中使用 "从阅读到学习"(R2L)教学法对学生摘要写作的有效性。英语作为额外语言的国际学生参加了澳大利亚一所大学提供的高级学术素养单元的四次独立迭代,并使用 R2L 教学法在线学习学术阅读和摘要写作。在每个学期该单元的第一周和最后一周分别进行了前测和后测。在两次测试之间的几周,辅导课(2 小时×9 周)由结构化和支架式师生互动组成,引导学生进行阅读和总结,并在从阅读到写作的过程中,从教师的高水平输入转向学生更大的独立性。结果发现,学生在理解和概括原文主要观点以及书写语法正确的复杂句子方面的能力有了明显提高。然而,教学对凝聚力、词汇和标点符号没有任何影响。尽管这项研究存在局限性,但研究结果证实了以前的研究结果,即 R2L 的价值,它为阅读和写作提供了一种支架式方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Relc Journal
Relc Journal LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The RELC Journal is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language education. The aim of this Journal is to present information and ideas on theories, research, methods and materials related to language learning and teaching. Within this framework the Journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as first and second language learning and teaching, language and culture, discourse analysis, language planning, language testing, multilingual education, stylistics, translation and information technology. The RELC Journal, therefore, is concerned with linguistics applied to education and contributions that have in mind the common professional concerns of both the practitioner and the researcher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信