Inspiratory Muscle Training Intensity in Patients Living with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review

Hearts Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.3390/hearts5010006
Anaïs Beaujolin, Jessica Mané, Céline Presse, Jordana Barbosa-Silva, Michela Bernini, Camilo Corbellini, R. M. de Abreu
{"title":"Inspiratory Muscle Training Intensity in Patients Living with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review","authors":"Anaïs Beaujolin, Jessica Mané, Céline Presse, Jordana Barbosa-Silva, Michela Bernini, Camilo Corbellini, R. M. de Abreu","doi":"10.3390/hearts5010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefits of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) have been demonstrated in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD); however, the optimal training intensity is not yet fully clarified. The purpose of this study was to review the impact of IMT intensity on respiratory muscle strength, functional and exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with CVD. This systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA statement and registered in the PROSPERO database (review protocol: CRD42023442378). Randomized controlled trials were retrieved on 3 July 2023 in the following electronic databases: Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Studies were included if they assessed the impact of isolated IMT on CVD patients in comparison with sham, different intensities and/or intervention groups. Eight studies were included for final analysis; IMT consistently led to significantly greater improvements in inspiratory muscle strength compared to control (CON) groups. The intensity of IMT varied in the studies based on different percentages of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), ranging from 25% to 60% of MIP. The time of intervention ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. Despite this variability, the studies collectively suggested that IMT is beneficial for enhancing CVD patients’ conditions. However, the optimal intensity range for benefits appeared to vary, and no single intensity emerged as universally superior across all studies.","PeriodicalId":512081,"journal":{"name":"Hearts","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hearts5010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) have been demonstrated in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD); however, the optimal training intensity is not yet fully clarified. The purpose of this study was to review the impact of IMT intensity on respiratory muscle strength, functional and exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and quality of life in patients with CVD. This systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA statement and registered in the PROSPERO database (review protocol: CRD42023442378). Randomized controlled trials were retrieved on 3 July 2023 in the following electronic databases: Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Studies were included if they assessed the impact of isolated IMT on CVD patients in comparison with sham, different intensities and/or intervention groups. Eight studies were included for final analysis; IMT consistently led to significantly greater improvements in inspiratory muscle strength compared to control (CON) groups. The intensity of IMT varied in the studies based on different percentages of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), ranging from 25% to 60% of MIP. The time of intervention ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. Despite this variability, the studies collectively suggested that IMT is beneficial for enhancing CVD patients’ conditions. However, the optimal intensity range for benefits appeared to vary, and no single intensity emerged as universally superior across all studies.
心血管疾病患者的吸气肌训练强度:系统性综述
吸气肌训练(IMT)对心血管疾病(CVD)患者的益处已得到证实,但最佳训练强度尚未完全明确。本研究旨在回顾吸气肌训练强度对心血管疾病患者呼吸肌力量、功能和运动能力、肺功能和生活质量的影响。本系统性综述根据 PRISMA 声明进行,并在 PROSPERO 数据库中注册(综述协议:CRD42023442378)。2023 年 7 月 3 日在以下电子数据库中检索了随机对照试验:科学网、PubMed、EMBASE 和 SCOPUS。如果研究评估了孤立IMT对心血管疾病患者的影响,并与假干预、不同强度干预和/或干预组进行了比较,则纳入这些研究。最终分析纳入了八项研究;与对照组(CON)相比,IMT始终能显著提高吸气肌力。根据最大吸气压力(MIP)的不同百分比,这些研究中的 IMT 强度各不相同,从 MIP 的 25% 到 60% 不等。干预时间从 4 周到 12 周不等。尽管存在这种差异,但这些研究共同表明,IMT 有利于改善心血管疾病患者的状况。但是,获益的最佳强度范围似乎各不相同,而且在所有研究中,没有一项强度具有普遍优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信