Reflections on Human Subjectivity in Modern Society—Based on the Perspectives of Baudrillard, Lacan and Fromm

Qianxue Qin
{"title":"Reflections on Human Subjectivity in Modern Society—Based on the Perspectives of Baudrillard, Lacan and Fromm","authors":"Qianxue Qin","doi":"10.22158/sssr.v5n1p71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of human subjectivity is prominent in modern society. By revealing the mechanism of consumption alienation in the symbolic society, Baudrillard critiques this mechanism for causing the loss of human subjectivity and the subsequent surge in human desire. Examining unresolved issues about desire and subjectivity within Baudrillard's \"Consumer Society\" theory through the framework of Lacan's theory of the subject of desire, we will demonstrate that Lacan's interpretation effectively eliminates the problem itself. From Baudrillard's \"consumer society\" to Lacan's \"desire society,\" people have changed from pure passivity to active awareness of their situation but still do not have enough subjective initiative. On the contrary, Fromm’s humanitarian ethics reflects on the problem of subjectivity from the perspective of holistic man rather than symbol, affirming that the inner power of human love and reason will lead man to transcend the general alienation of man so as to realize one's potential productively with joy and happiness as \"being\" rather than \"thing.\" Only in Fromm's \"productive society\" will human subjectivity cease to be an issue.","PeriodicalId":508472,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Science Research","volume":"28 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v5n1p71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of human subjectivity is prominent in modern society. By revealing the mechanism of consumption alienation in the symbolic society, Baudrillard critiques this mechanism for causing the loss of human subjectivity and the subsequent surge in human desire. Examining unresolved issues about desire and subjectivity within Baudrillard's "Consumer Society" theory through the framework of Lacan's theory of the subject of desire, we will demonstrate that Lacan's interpretation effectively eliminates the problem itself. From Baudrillard's "consumer society" to Lacan's "desire society," people have changed from pure passivity to active awareness of their situation but still do not have enough subjective initiative. On the contrary, Fromm’s humanitarian ethics reflects on the problem of subjectivity from the perspective of holistic man rather than symbol, affirming that the inner power of human love and reason will lead man to transcend the general alienation of man so as to realize one's potential productively with joy and happiness as "being" rather than "thing." Only in Fromm's "productive society" will human subjectivity cease to be an issue.
基于鲍德里亚、拉康和弗洛姆视角的现代社会中人的主体性思考
人的主体性问题是现代社会的突出问题。鲍德里亚通过揭示符号社会中的消费异化机制,批判了这一机制导致的人的主体性的丧失以及随之而来的人的欲望的激增。通过拉康的欲望主体理论框架来审视鲍德里亚 "消费社会 "理论中尚未解决的欲望和主体性问题,我们将证明拉康的解释有效地消除了问题本身。从鲍德里亚的 "消费社会 "到拉康的 "欲望社会",人们从纯粹的被动变为对自身处境的主动认知,但主观能动性依然不足。相反,弗洛姆的人道主义伦理学从整体的人而非符号的角度反思主体性问题,肯定人的爱和理性的内在力量将引导人超越人的普遍异化,从而以作为 "存在 "而非 "事物 "的快乐和幸福来生产性地实现人的潜能。只有在弗洛姆的 "生产性社会 "中,人的主体性才不再是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信