Growing, learning, sharing, and healing through Home Garden Network: A social capital framework

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Sothy Eng, Carli Donoghue, Tricia Khun, Whitney Szmodis
{"title":"Growing, learning, sharing, and healing through Home Garden Network: A social capital framework","authors":"Sothy Eng,&nbsp;Carli Donoghue,&nbsp;Tricia Khun,&nbsp;Whitney Szmodis","doi":"10.1111/fare.13008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The study addresses two research inquiries: evaluating the effectiveness of the Home Garden Network (HGN) program in attaining its four intended outcomes (learning, growing, sharing, and healing) as well as exploring the social capital mechanisms in facilitating the four outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Drawing from Coleman's social capital theory, the HGN program was developed in response to common issues many families experience: the lack of family leisure time, dietary-related health issues, and food insecurity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individual interviews were conducted with eight program participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The findings revealed that the program produced the four intended outcomes in which the three forms of social capital (i.e., information channels, reciprocity, and social norms) served as mechanisms that explained the outcomes. Through information channels, participants learned from their network members as well as the program facilitators. Reciprocity is fostered through a system where families take turns assisting each other in growing their gardens, establishing a sense of mutual obligation. Social norms encourage the sharing of produce and plants, reinforcing a collective culture of generosity. Reciprocal relationships further strengthened their interpersonal bonding experiences, providing participants with a sense of group identity and belonging, and hence healing. In addition, families utilize their gardens as a communication starter, establishing social norms of routines and responsibilities that promote family cohesion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study validates the HGN program in achieving its learning, growing, sharing, and healing objectives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The program offers implementation opportunities for human services organizations and land-grant universities, aligning with social policies promoting food security and healthy lifestyles.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study addresses two research inquiries: evaluating the effectiveness of the Home Garden Network (HGN) program in attaining its four intended outcomes (learning, growing, sharing, and healing) as well as exploring the social capital mechanisms in facilitating the four outcomes.

Background

Drawing from Coleman's social capital theory, the HGN program was developed in response to common issues many families experience: the lack of family leisure time, dietary-related health issues, and food insecurity.

Methods

Individual interviews were conducted with eight program participants.

Results

The findings revealed that the program produced the four intended outcomes in which the three forms of social capital (i.e., information channels, reciprocity, and social norms) served as mechanisms that explained the outcomes. Through information channels, participants learned from their network members as well as the program facilitators. Reciprocity is fostered through a system where families take turns assisting each other in growing their gardens, establishing a sense of mutual obligation. Social norms encourage the sharing of produce and plants, reinforcing a collective culture of generosity. Reciprocal relationships further strengthened their interpersonal bonding experiences, providing participants with a sense of group identity and belonging, and hence healing. In addition, families utilize their gardens as a communication starter, establishing social norms of routines and responsibilities that promote family cohesion.

Conclusion

The study validates the HGN program in achieving its learning, growing, sharing, and healing objectives.

Implications

The program offers implementation opportunities for human services organizations and land-grant universities, aligning with social policies promoting food security and healthy lifestyles.

通过家庭花园网络实现成长、学习、分享和康复:社会资本框架
本研究涉及两项研究调查:评估家庭花园网络(HGN)计划在实现其四项预期成果(学习、成长、分享和康复)方面的有效性,以及探索促进这四项成果的社会资本机制。根据科尔曼的社会资本理论,HGN 计划是为应对许多家庭遇到的共同问题而开发的:缺乏家庭休闲时间、与饮食相关的健康问题以及粮食不安全、调查结果显示,该计划产生了四项预期成果,其中三种形式的社会资本(即信息渠道、互惠和社会规范)成为解释这些成果的机制。通过信息渠道,参与者从他们的网络成员以及计划促进者那里学习。互惠是通过家庭轮流协助彼此种植菜园的制度来培养的,从而建立起一种相互义务感。社会规范鼓励分享农产品和植物,强化了慷慨的集体文化。互惠关系进一步加强了他们的人际关系,为参与者提供了一种群体认同感和归属感,从而达到治愈的目的。这项研究验证了 HGN 计划在实现其学习、种植、分享和康复目标方面的有效性。该计划为人类服务组织和赠地大学提供了实施机会,与促进食品安全和健康生活方式的社会政策相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信