VISUAL OUTCOME BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED VITRECTOMY IN ENDOPHTHALMITIS PATIENTS OPERATED IN KARIADI GENERAL HOSPITAL, SEMARANG : TWO YEARS DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

Suci Rahmayanti, Satya Hutama Pragnanda
{"title":"VISUAL OUTCOME BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED VITRECTOMY IN ENDOPHTHALMITIS PATIENTS OPERATED IN KARIADI GENERAL HOSPITAL, SEMARANG : TWO YEARS DESCRIPTIVE STUDY","authors":"Suci Rahmayanti, Satya Hutama Pragnanda","doi":"10.35749/9apdah80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & ObjectivesEndophthalmitis is a medical emergency caused by infection of tissue or fluids inside the eyeball.Vitrectomy for endophthalmitis is one of the treatment choice and leads to VA gains in some cases.Timing of surgery and visual outcome after surgery are vital to acknowledge. This study aims toanalyze the difference of visual outcome between early and delayed vitrectomy in endophthalmitispatients operated in Dr. Kariadi General Hospital \nMethodsA Retrospective study held from medical record of patients with endophthalmitis underwentvitrectomy surgery from January 2021 – January 2023 in Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang.Endophthalmitis patients caused by trauma were excluded. All of the patients had immediatevitrectomy, and based on duration of symptoms, the patients were divided into two groups, earlyvitrectomy (duration of symptoms ? 7 days) and delayed vitrectomy (duration of symptoms > 7days). Independent t- test method was used to analyze the data (significant if p<0.05) \nResultsTotally 30 endophthalmitis patients (30 eyes) were obtained. There were 18 patients (60%) had earlyvitrectomy and 12 patients (40%) had delayed vitrectomy. Postoperative examination showed 13(72%) patients with early vitrectomy had improved VA, and 5 (28%) had constant VA. On the otherhand, patients with delayed vitrectomy showed 5 (42%) had improved VA, 6 (50%) had constant VA,and 1 (8%) had decreased VA. The difference between two groups was significant (p=0.014) \nConclusionThis study found endophthalmitis patients with early vitrectomy had significant better visualoutcome than delayed vitrectomy","PeriodicalId":165753,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35749/9apdah80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction & ObjectivesEndophthalmitis is a medical emergency caused by infection of tissue or fluids inside the eyeball.Vitrectomy for endophthalmitis is one of the treatment choice and leads to VA gains in some cases.Timing of surgery and visual outcome after surgery are vital to acknowledge. This study aims toanalyze the difference of visual outcome between early and delayed vitrectomy in endophthalmitispatients operated in Dr. Kariadi General Hospital MethodsA Retrospective study held from medical record of patients with endophthalmitis underwentvitrectomy surgery from January 2021 – January 2023 in Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang.Endophthalmitis patients caused by trauma were excluded. All of the patients had immediatevitrectomy, and based on duration of symptoms, the patients were divided into two groups, earlyvitrectomy (duration of symptoms ? 7 days) and delayed vitrectomy (duration of symptoms > 7days). Independent t- test method was used to analyze the data (significant if p<0.05) ResultsTotally 30 endophthalmitis patients (30 eyes) were obtained. There were 18 patients (60%) had earlyvitrectomy and 12 patients (40%) had delayed vitrectomy. Postoperative examination showed 13(72%) patients with early vitrectomy had improved VA, and 5 (28%) had constant VA. On the otherhand, patients with delayed vitrectomy showed 5 (42%) had improved VA, 6 (50%) had constant VA,and 1 (8%) had decreased VA. The difference between two groups was significant (p=0.014) ConclusionThis study found endophthalmitis patients with early vitrectomy had significant better visualoutcome than delayed vitrectomy
在塞马良 Kariadi 综合医院接受手术的眼底病患者早期和延迟玻璃体切除术之间的视觉效果:为期两年的描述性研究
眼底病是由眼球内组织或液体感染引起的急症。眼底病的玻璃体切除术是治疗眼底病的选择之一,在某些病例中可提高视力。本研究旨在分析在卡里亚迪博士总医院接受手术的眼底病患者中,早期和延迟玻璃体切割术对视觉效果的影响差异。所有患者均立即进行了玻璃体切割手术,并根据症状持续时间将患者分为两组,即早期玻璃体切割手术组(症状持续时间少于 7 天)和延迟玻璃体切割手术组(症状持续时间多于 7 天)。采用独立 t 检验法分析数据(P<0.05 为差异有显著性)。其中 18 名患者(60%)进行了早期玻璃体切除术,12 名患者(40%)进行了延迟玻璃体切除术。术后检查显示,13 名(72%)早期玻璃体切除患者的视力有所改善,5 名(28%)视力不变。而延迟玻璃体切除术的患者中,5 例(42%)视力有所提高,6 例(50%)视力保持不变,1 例(8%)视力下降。两组之间差异显著(P=0.014)。 结论本研究发现眼底病患者早期玻璃体切除术的视觉效果明显优于延迟玻璃体切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信