Clinical Characteristics and Compliance of Diabetic Macular Edema Patients to Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection Loading Dose at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital

Theresia Kania, A. R. Yudhanta
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Compliance of Diabetic Macular Edema Patients to Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection Loading Dose at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital","authors":"Theresia Kania, A. R. Yudhanta","doi":"10.35749/e74s1782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & ObjectivesDiabetic retinopathy is the fifth most common cause of preventable blindness. In cases of diabeticmacular edema (DME), loading dose is a critical phase to achieve a stable concentration ofintravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in order to prevent progressivity. This studyaims to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics, waiting time, compliance, as well asthe relationship between education, domicile and clinical outcomes to compliance during loadingdose in DME patients. \nMethodsIn this retrospective descriptive study, we reviewed medical records of DME patients who receivedanti-VEGF intravitreal injection between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020, while alsocomparing records in 2019 (pre-Covid-19) and 2020 (during Covid-19). \nResultsThere were 160 patients (207 eyeballs) in 2019 and 83 patients (114 eyeballs) in 2020 who receivedloading dose with similar profiles of sex, age, education, initial visual acuity and central macularthickness (CMT). Median waiting times in 2019 and 2020 were 19 days and 23.5 days, respectively(p=0.016). Only 25 (30.5%) and 15 (35.7%) patients were punctual in 2019 and 2020, respectively.There was no significant relationship between education and domicile with compliance (p= 0.45, p=0.51). Furthermore, there were visual acuity improvements of -0.18 logMAR and -0.0 logMAR in thepunctual and unpunctual group, respectively, as well as CMT decrease of -181 ?m and -156 ?m,respectively. \nConclusionMost patients who received loading dose were unpunctual. There was no significant relationshipbetween education and domicile with compliance. Furthermore, there were more significantimprovements in clinical outcomes among the punctual patients.","PeriodicalId":165753,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35749/e74s1782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction & ObjectivesDiabetic retinopathy is the fifth most common cause of preventable blindness. In cases of diabeticmacular edema (DME), loading dose is a critical phase to achieve a stable concentration ofintravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in order to prevent progressivity. This studyaims to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics, waiting time, compliance, as well asthe relationship between education, domicile and clinical outcomes to compliance during loadingdose in DME patients. MethodsIn this retrospective descriptive study, we reviewed medical records of DME patients who receivedanti-VEGF intravitreal injection between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020, while alsocomparing records in 2019 (pre-Covid-19) and 2020 (during Covid-19). ResultsThere were 160 patients (207 eyeballs) in 2019 and 83 patients (114 eyeballs) in 2020 who receivedloading dose with similar profiles of sex, age, education, initial visual acuity and central macularthickness (CMT). Median waiting times in 2019 and 2020 were 19 days and 23.5 days, respectively(p=0.016). Only 25 (30.5%) and 15 (35.7%) patients were punctual in 2019 and 2020, respectively.There was no significant relationship between education and domicile with compliance (p= 0.45, p=0.51). Furthermore, there were visual acuity improvements of -0.18 logMAR and -0.0 logMAR in thepunctual and unpunctual group, respectively, as well as CMT decrease of -181 ?m and -156 ?m,respectively. ConclusionMost patients who received loading dose were unpunctual. There was no significant relationshipbetween education and domicile with compliance. Furthermore, there were more significantimprovements in clinical outcomes among the punctual patients.
Cipto Mangunkusumo 医院糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的临床特征和对静脉注射抗血管内皮生长因子加载剂量的依从性
导言与目的糖尿病视网膜病变是导致可预防性失明的第五大常见原因。在糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的病例中,负荷剂量是一个关键阶段,以达到稳定的玻璃体内血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)浓度,从而防止病情恶化。本研究旨在确定 DME 患者的人口统计学和临床特征、等待时间、依从性,以及教育程度、户籍和临床结果与负荷剂量期间依从性之间的关系。方法在这项回顾性描述性研究中,我们回顾了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接受抗 VEGF 玻璃体内注射的 DME 患者的医疗记录,同时比较了 2019 年(Covid-19 之前)和 2020 年(Covid-19 期间)的记录。结果2019年有160名患者(207只眼球)接受了加载剂量,2020年有83名患者(114只眼球)接受了加载剂量,他们的性别、年龄、教育程度、初始视力和黄斑中心厚度(CMT)情况相似。2019年和2020年的中位等待时间分别为19天和23.5天(P=0.016)。2019年和2020年,分别只有25名(30.5%)和15名(35.7%)患者准时就诊,教育程度和户籍与依从性无显著关系(p= 0.45,p=0.51)。此外,守时组和不守时组的视力分别提高了-0.18 logMAR和-0.0 logMAR,CMT分别下降了-181 m和-156 m。结论大多数接受负荷剂量治疗的患者都没有守时。教育程度和居住地与依从性无明显关系。此外,按时服药的患者的临床疗效有更明显的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信