Does citizen opinion matter? An analysis of police officers’ support for democratic policing in South Korea

Seung hyun Kim, Kwang Hyun Ra, Sang Hun Lee, Do Sun Lee
{"title":"Does citizen opinion matter? An analysis of police officers’ support for democratic policing in South Korea","authors":"Seung hyun Kim, Kwang Hyun Ra, Sang Hun Lee, Do Sun Lee","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-09-2023-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study examined the effects of organizational justice and citizen respect to support for democratic policing through self-legitimacy among South Korean police officers.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used survey data from 467 South Korean police officers in 2022. Structural equation model analysis was used to examine relationships between each variable.FindingsThis study found a positive relationship between organizational justice and self-assessed legitimacy. Also, citizen respect had a positive relationship with both police officers' self-assessed legitimacy and audience legitimacy. Self-assessed legitimacy had a significant effect on support for democratic policing, while perceived-audience legitimacy did not have a significant effect on support for democratic policing.Originality/valueThe current study provides evidence that self-legitimacy affects supporting democratic policing in a non-Western democracy. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the role of police self-legitimacy as a link between organizational justice and citizen respect and the intended behaviors of police officers toward citizens.","PeriodicalId":512699,"journal":{"name":"Policing: An International Journal","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-09-2023-0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study examined the effects of organizational justice and citizen respect to support for democratic policing through self-legitimacy among South Korean police officers.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used survey data from 467 South Korean police officers in 2022. Structural equation model analysis was used to examine relationships between each variable.FindingsThis study found a positive relationship between organizational justice and self-assessed legitimacy. Also, citizen respect had a positive relationship with both police officers' self-assessed legitimacy and audience legitimacy. Self-assessed legitimacy had a significant effect on support for democratic policing, while perceived-audience legitimacy did not have a significant effect on support for democratic policing.Originality/valueThe current study provides evidence that self-legitimacy affects supporting democratic policing in a non-Western democracy. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the role of police self-legitimacy as a link between organizational justice and citizen respect and the intended behaviors of police officers toward citizens.
公民意见重要吗?对韩国警察支持民主警务的分析
目的本研究探讨了组织公正和公民尊重对韩国警察通过自我合法性支持民主警务的影响。研究结果本研究发现,组织公正与自我评估的合法性之间存在正相关关系。此外,公民尊重与警察自评合法性和受众合法性之间也存在正相关关系。自我评估的合法性对支持民主警务有显著影响,而感知到的受众合法性对支持民主警务没有显著影响。此外,据我们所知,本研究首次探讨了警察自我合法性在组织公正和公民尊重与警察对公民的预期行为之间的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信