Assessing Work Reorganisation and the Constraints of Standard Labour Practices in Nigerian Food and Beverage Sector

IF 1.1 4区社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Journal of Asian and African Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1177/00219096231224694

J. Jawando, Adebimpe A. Adenugba

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growth in the number of multinational corporations has heightened insecurity and vulnerability for workers globally. Relying on Gramsci hegemony theory as it theoretical leaning, the paper examined work reorganisation and the constraints of standard labour practices in Nigerian Food and Beverage Sector. The study found that casualisation did not encourage best labour practices in the food and beverage industry. There was significant relationship between work reorganisation ( r = 0.29, df (224) = p < .01) and decent work treatment of non-permanent staff in the beverage sub-sector Therefore, stakeholders should put effective monitoring mechanisms in place to enhance best labour practices in food and beverage industry.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估尼日利亚食品饮料行业的工作重组和标准劳动实践的制约因素

跨国公司数量的增长加剧了全球工人的不安全感和脆弱性。本文以葛兰西霸权理论为理论依据，研究了尼日利亚食品饮料行业的工作重组和标准劳动实践的制约因素。研究发现，临时工化并不鼓励食品和饮料行业的最佳劳动实践。工作重组（r = 0.29，df (224) = p < .01）与饮料分行业非长期员工的体面工作待遇之间存在重大关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Asian and African Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Asian and African Studies (JAAS) was founded in 1965 to further research and study on Asia and Africa. JAAS is a peer reviewed journal of area studies recognised for consistent scholarly contributions to cutting-edge issues and debates. The journal welcomes articles, research notes, and book reviews that focus on the dynamics of global change and development of Asian and African nations, societies, cultures, and the global community. Published articles cover: -development and change -technology and communication -globalization -public administration -politics -economy -education -health, wealth, and welfare -poverty and growth -humanities -sociology -political science -linguistics -economics JAAS adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Decisions on manuscripts will be taken as rapidly as possible. However, while it is hoped that a decision can be made in 6-8 weeks, the refereeing process makes it impossible to predict the length of time that will be required to process any given manuscript.