Decision support model to assess pesticide safeness toward environment

Ariel Peaceo Gunawan, D. N. Utama
{"title":"Decision support model to assess pesticide safeness toward environment","authors":"Ariel Peaceo Gunawan, D. N. Utama","doi":"10.5620/eaht.2024003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For farmers around the world to protect crops from disturbing pests, it is common to use pesticides to ward off the growth of pests or even eliminate them. Even though pesticides are seen as a good thing for protecting crops, there is one thing that mustn’t be forgotten the origin of the pesticide itself is a toxin compound that is dangerous if used irresponsibly. The main concern of this study is excessive use of pesticides may cause serious consequences to the ecosystem and environment through the accumulation of pesticide residue by irresponsible farmers. To minimize the effects of pesticide residues, the selection of the type of pesticide needs to be considered which type may not be harmful to the environment's health even though accumulation happens. Therefore, in this study, a fuzzy-based computational model assessor was built to measure the safety level of pesticides toward the environment. The fuzzy model was created with consideration of several parameters related to pesticide behaviors, its effects on beneficial organisms, and its persistence in the environment. The method used for this study includes literature reviewing, fuzzification, statistical approach, expert knowledge sharing, and quantitative analysis. The model created in this study can assist in a more accurate and realistic method of selecting better pesticide options that will be used by farmers. To ensure the validity of the model, verifying and validating the formula and pesticide result assessment were done with related literature articles. In this study, from 10 types of pesticides used as a sample, dodine, and iprodione pesticides are the best option for protecting crops with a safety level of 7.36, and abamectin, dimethoate, chorpyrifos, and methidathion are not safe options for farming use because of its potential of harming the environment.","PeriodicalId":515414,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology","volume":"60 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2024003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For farmers around the world to protect crops from disturbing pests, it is common to use pesticides to ward off the growth of pests or even eliminate them. Even though pesticides are seen as a good thing for protecting crops, there is one thing that mustn’t be forgotten the origin of the pesticide itself is a toxin compound that is dangerous if used irresponsibly. The main concern of this study is excessive use of pesticides may cause serious consequences to the ecosystem and environment through the accumulation of pesticide residue by irresponsible farmers. To minimize the effects of pesticide residues, the selection of the type of pesticide needs to be considered which type may not be harmful to the environment's health even though accumulation happens. Therefore, in this study, a fuzzy-based computational model assessor was built to measure the safety level of pesticides toward the environment. The fuzzy model was created with consideration of several parameters related to pesticide behaviors, its effects on beneficial organisms, and its persistence in the environment. The method used for this study includes literature reviewing, fuzzification, statistical approach, expert knowledge sharing, and quantitative analysis. The model created in this study can assist in a more accurate and realistic method of selecting better pesticide options that will be used by farmers. To ensure the validity of the model, verifying and validating the formula and pesticide result assessment were done with related literature articles. In this study, from 10 types of pesticides used as a sample, dodine, and iprodione pesticides are the best option for protecting crops with a safety level of 7.36, and abamectin, dimethoate, chorpyrifos, and methidathion are not safe options for farming use because of its potential of harming the environment.
评估农药对环境安全性的决策支持模型
世界各地的农民为了保护农作物免受害虫的侵扰,通常会使用杀虫剂来抵御害虫的生长,甚至消灭害虫。尽管杀虫剂被认为是保护农作物的好东西,但有一点不能忘记,那就是杀虫剂本身是一种有毒化合物,如果不负责任地使用,会带来危险。这项研究主要关注的是,不负责任的农民过度使用农药可能会导致农药残留积累,从而对生态系统和环境造成严重后果。为了将农药残留的影响降到最低,在选择农药类型时,需要考虑哪种类型的农药即使发生积累,也不会对环境健康造成危害。因此,本研究建立了一个基于模糊计算模型的评估器,以衡量农药对环境的安全水平。该模糊模型的建立考虑到了与农药行为、对有益生物的影响及其在环境中的持久性有关的几个参数。本研究采用的方法包括文献查阅、模糊化、统计方法、专家知识共享和定量分析。本研究创建的模型可以帮助农民更准确、更现实地选择更好的农药方案。为确保该模型的有效性,我们利用相关文献对计算公式和农药结果评估进行了验证和确认。在这项研究中,以 10 种农药为样本,多菌灵和异丙威农药是保护农作物的最佳选择,其安全等级为 7.36,而阿维菌素、乐果、毒死蜱和甲胺磷因可能危害环境而不是安全的农用选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书