Benefits over threats associated with host-country nationals’ acculturation preferences: Examining a stereotype content and threat benefit model

Marcus A. Valenzuela, Seth J. Schwartz, Hanna Zagefka
{"title":"Benefits over threats associated with host-country nationals’ acculturation preferences: Examining a stereotype content and threat benefit model","authors":"Marcus A. Valenzuela, Seth J. Schwartz, Hanna Zagefka","doi":"10.1177/13684302231219681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A survey study in the US ( N = 647) tested predictors of host-country nationals’ acculturation preferences regarding whether participants would want immigrants to adopt the mainstream U.S. identity and/or retain their heritage identity. A model was tested positing that perceived competition with immigrants, and the perceived status of immigrants, would predict positive stereotypes held about immigrants in terms of warmth and competence. Positive stereotypes, in turn, were predicted to relate to the extent to which immigrants were seen as posing a threat and/or bringing benefits to the US. Threats and benefits were then posited as predicting the extent to which host-country nationals would want immigrants to adopt a mainstream U.S. identity and/or retain their heritage identity. Although results partially supported our hypotheses, it seems clearer that perceived benefits, rather than threats (which have previously received more attention), appear to predict host-country nationals’ acculturation preferences. The theoretical and applied relevance of these findings is discussed.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"29 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231219681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A survey study in the US ( N = 647) tested predictors of host-country nationals’ acculturation preferences regarding whether participants would want immigrants to adopt the mainstream U.S. identity and/or retain their heritage identity. A model was tested positing that perceived competition with immigrants, and the perceived status of immigrants, would predict positive stereotypes held about immigrants in terms of warmth and competence. Positive stereotypes, in turn, were predicted to relate to the extent to which immigrants were seen as posing a threat and/or bringing benefits to the US. Threats and benefits were then posited as predicting the extent to which host-country nationals would want immigrants to adopt a mainstream U.S. identity and/or retain their heritage identity. Although results partially supported our hypotheses, it seems clearer that perceived benefits, rather than threats (which have previously received more attention), appear to predict host-country nationals’ acculturation preferences. The theoretical and applied relevance of these findings is discussed.
与东道国国民的文化适应偏好相关的好处多于威胁:检验刻板印象内容和威胁利益模型
一项在美国进行的调查研究(N = 647)测试了东道国国民文化适应偏好的预测因素,即参与者是否希望移民采用美国主流身份和/或保留其传统身份。研究建立了一个模型,该模型认为,与移民的竞争感和移民的地位感会预测对移民在热情和能力方面的积极刻板印象。反过来,积极的刻板印象又与移民被视为对美国构成威胁和/或给美国带来好处的程度有关。然后,威胁和益处又被认为可以预测东道国国民希望移民采用美国主流身份和/或保留其传统身份的程度。尽管结果部分支持了我们的假设,但似乎更清楚的是,感知到的好处,而不是威胁(以前受到更多关注),似乎可以预测东道国国民的文化适应偏好。本文讨论了这些发现的理论和应用意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信