The myopic focus on decoloniality in applied linguistics and English language education: citations and stolen subjectivities

IF 2.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ali Fuad Selvi
{"title":"The myopic focus on decoloniality in applied linguistics and English language education: citations and stolen subjectivities","authors":"Ali Fuad Selvi","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2024-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent surge in acknowledging and critically engaging with identity, advocacy, social justice, criticality, anti-racism, and decolonization in applied linguistics has initiated a process aimed at destabilizing, disrupting, and eventually transforming the geopolitics of knowledge, epistemological orientations, ideological commitments, and methodological practices in research. The current study investigates the evolutionary trajectory of decoloniality in applied linguistics, specifically focusing on citation practices as a point of entry in knowledge building, theorization, and dissemination in major journals over the past 5 years. The findings uncover the consistent invisibility of scholars from the Global South as authors (who use their voices [in]form the knowledge building and dissemination), cited authors (whose voices are used to [in]form the knowledge building and dissemination), and editors/editorial board members (whose vision and practices that ultimately [in]form disciplinary norms, expectations, and directions about knowledge building and dissemination). These (in)advertent (self-) exclusionary trends relegate Southern voices, subjectivities, and epistemological perspectives, perpetuating the dominance of the Anglosphere and obscuring ongoing epistemic appropriation. It concludes that resisting epistemic injustices (erasure, silence, and theft) must be regarded as an ethical, ideological, and professional imperative and demand the deployment of rhetorical strategies, equitable citation practices, collaborative initiatives, and a sustained commitment to decolonial skepticism.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent surge in acknowledging and critically engaging with identity, advocacy, social justice, criticality, anti-racism, and decolonization in applied linguistics has initiated a process aimed at destabilizing, disrupting, and eventually transforming the geopolitics of knowledge, epistemological orientations, ideological commitments, and methodological practices in research. The current study investigates the evolutionary trajectory of decoloniality in applied linguistics, specifically focusing on citation practices as a point of entry in knowledge building, theorization, and dissemination in major journals over the past 5 years. The findings uncover the consistent invisibility of scholars from the Global South as authors (who use their voices [in]form the knowledge building and dissemination), cited authors (whose voices are used to [in]form the knowledge building and dissemination), and editors/editorial board members (whose vision and practices that ultimately [in]form disciplinary norms, expectations, and directions about knowledge building and dissemination). These (in)advertent (self-) exclusionary trends relegate Southern voices, subjectivities, and epistemological perspectives, perpetuating the dominance of the Anglosphere and obscuring ongoing epistemic appropriation. It concludes that resisting epistemic injustices (erasure, silence, and theft) must be regarded as an ethical, ideological, and professional imperative and demand the deployment of rhetorical strategies, equitable citation practices, collaborative initiatives, and a sustained commitment to decolonial skepticism.
应用语言学和英语教育中对非殖民主义的近视关注:引文和被盗主体性
最近,在应用语言学中承认并批判性地参与身份、倡导、社会正义、批判性、反种族主义和非殖民化的浪潮已经启动了一个进程,旨在颠覆、扰乱并最终改变知识的地缘政治、认识论取向、意识形态承诺和研究的方法论实践。本研究调查了应用语言学中去殖民化的演变轨迹,特别关注过去五年中作为知识构建、理论化和传播切入点的主要期刊的引文实践。研究结果揭示了来自全球南部的学者作为作者(他们用自己的声音[参与]形成知识的构建和传播)、被引作者(他们的声音被用来[参与]形成知识的构建和传播)和编辑/编委会成员(他们的愿景和实践最终[参与]形成关于知识构建和传播的学科规范、期望和方向)的一贯不可见性。这些(不经意的)(自我)排斥趋势将南方的声音、主体性和认识论视角贬低,延续了盎格鲁圈的主导地位,掩盖了正在进行的认识论挪用。本报告的结论是,必须将抵制认识论上的不公正(抹杀、沉默和盗窃)视为道德、意识形态和专业上的当务之急,并要求部署修辞策略、公平的引用实践、合作倡议以及对非殖民化怀疑论的持续承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信