{"title":"Richard, bishop of Syracuse and archbishop of Messina (d. 1195), and the History of the Tyrants of Sicily","authors":"MARK HAGGER","doi":"10.1111/1468-229X.13390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reconsiders the agenda and authorship of the Liber de regno Sicilie or History of the Tyrants of Sicily by way of a detailed study of its content<i>. The History</i> comprises one of the very few detailed sources for the kingdom of Sicily under Kings William I (1154–66) and William II (1166–89), and while it only covers part of the period in question (1154–69), it is of fundamental importance for what it tells us about the politics, characters, and society of the day, and particularly for its insights into the treacherous world of Sicilian court politics. It was clearly the work of an insider, or a well-connected observer. But none of the suggestions as to the author's identity so far advanced have achieved a scholarly consensus. This article highlights the unexpectedly prominent position given to Richard, bishop-elect of Syracuse, throughout the narrative, and uses the outline of Richard's career, the positive construction of his actions, and the explanation and apology that lies beneath the report of his deeds, to argue that either Richard himself or someone who was part of his retinue and shared his experiences was the author. That identification also permits some suggestions to be made as to the purpose of the History and the possible contemporary audiences to whom it made its case.</p>","PeriodicalId":13162,"journal":{"name":"History","volume":"109 384-385","pages":"3-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-229X.13390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article reconsiders the agenda and authorship of the Liber de regno Sicilie or History of the Tyrants of Sicily by way of a detailed study of its content. The History comprises one of the very few detailed sources for the kingdom of Sicily under Kings William I (1154–66) and William II (1166–89), and while it only covers part of the period in question (1154–69), it is of fundamental importance for what it tells us about the politics, characters, and society of the day, and particularly for its insights into the treacherous world of Sicilian court politics. It was clearly the work of an insider, or a well-connected observer. But none of the suggestions as to the author's identity so far advanced have achieved a scholarly consensus. This article highlights the unexpectedly prominent position given to Richard, bishop-elect of Syracuse, throughout the narrative, and uses the outline of Richard's career, the positive construction of his actions, and the explanation and apology that lies beneath the report of his deeds, to argue that either Richard himself or someone who was part of his retinue and shared his experiences was the author. That identification also permits some suggestions to be made as to the purpose of the History and the possible contemporary audiences to whom it made its case.
本文通过对 Liber de regno Sicilie 或《西西里暴君史》内容的详细研究,重新考虑了该书的议程和作者。这部历史是威廉一世(1154-66 年)和威廉二世(1166-89 年)统治下的西西里王国为数不多的详细资料之一,虽然它只涵盖了相关时期(1154-69 年)的一部分,但它对我们了解当时的政治、人物和社会,尤其是对西西里宫廷政治的险恶世界的洞察力,具有极其重要的意义。这显然是一位内部人士或关系密切的观察者的作品。但迄今为止,关于作者身份的各种说法都没有在学术界达成共识。本文强调了理查德--锡拉库扎的当选主教--在整个叙事中出人意料地被置于突出的位置,并通过理查德的职业生涯概述、对其行为的正面描述以及对其事迹报道下的解释和道歉,来论证理查德本人或与他同为随从并分享其经历的人就是作者。这种认定也允许我们就《历史》的目的和可能的当代读者提出一些建议。
期刊介绍:
First published in 1912, History has been a leader in its field ever since. It is unique in its range and variety, packing its pages with stimulating articles and extensive book reviews. History balances its broad chronological coverage with a wide geographical spread of articles featuring contributions from social, political, cultural, economic and ecclesiastical historians. History seeks to publish articles on broad, challenging themes, which not only display sound scholarship which is embedded within current historiographical debates, but push those debates forward. History encourages submissions which are also attractively and clearly written. Reviews: An integral part of each issue is the review section giving critical analysis of the latest scholarship across an extensive chronological and geographical range.