Do you prefer logging in? The relevance of the experience of telework for well-being

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Begoña Urien, Amaya Erro-Garcés
{"title":"Do you prefer logging in? The relevance of the experience of telework for well-being","authors":"Begoña Urien, Amaya Erro-Garcés","doi":"10.1108/er-10-2022-0487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The swift and unanticipated integration of telework by European companies due to COVID-19 gave rise to distinct features of telework. These attributes underscore the necessity of analysing its impact on employees’ well-being. This paper explores how telework experiences impact well-being by influencing work–life balance and job satisfaction. Additionally, it investigates whether employee preferences for telework are a contributing factor.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on the data provided by the “living, working and COVID-19” e-survey, structural equation models (SEM) were used to test the hypotheses. Specifically, a multiple-mediation approach and path analyses were applied to measure the relationship between the variables under study. The moderating role of preference for telework was also tested.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Key findings support that telework experience has a positive impact on well-being, both directly and indirectly, particularly via work–life balance. Although preference for telework strengthens the relationship between telework experience and well-being, it does not enhance the predictive power of the mediated model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>These results have important implications from an applied perspective. Human capital departments as well as managers should design telework programmes to create a positive experience since this will ensure a positive influence on the perception of work–life balance, job satisfaction and well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>COVID-19 as a sudden environmental constraint forced the implementation of telework without proper planning and training. Thus, how the employees experience this major change in their working conditions has affected their well-being. The present paper contributes to clarifying how the proposed variables relate under such constraints.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-10-2022-0487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The swift and unanticipated integration of telework by European companies due to COVID-19 gave rise to distinct features of telework. These attributes underscore the necessity of analysing its impact on employees’ well-being. This paper explores how telework experiences impact well-being by influencing work–life balance and job satisfaction. Additionally, it investigates whether employee preferences for telework are a contributing factor.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on the data provided by the “living, working and COVID-19” e-survey, structural equation models (SEM) were used to test the hypotheses. Specifically, a multiple-mediation approach and path analyses were applied to measure the relationship between the variables under study. The moderating role of preference for telework was also tested.

Findings

Key findings support that telework experience has a positive impact on well-being, both directly and indirectly, particularly via work–life balance. Although preference for telework strengthens the relationship between telework experience and well-being, it does not enhance the predictive power of the mediated model.

Practical implications

These results have important implications from an applied perspective. Human capital departments as well as managers should design telework programmes to create a positive experience since this will ensure a positive influence on the perception of work–life balance, job satisfaction and well-being.

Originality/value

COVID-19 as a sudden environmental constraint forced the implementation of telework without proper planning and training. Thus, how the employees experience this major change in their working conditions has affected their well-being. The present paper contributes to clarifying how the proposed variables relate under such constraints.

您更喜欢登录吗?远程工作体验与幸福感的相关性
目的 由于 COVID-19 的实施,欧洲公司在意料之外迅速整合了远程工作,从而产生了远程工 作的独特特征。这些特点凸显了分析其对员工幸福感影响的必要性。本文探讨了远程工作体验如何通过影响工作与生活的平衡和工作满意度来影响幸福感。设计/方法/途径基于 "生活、工作和 COVID-19 "电子调查提供的数据,采用结构方程模型(SEM)来检验假设。具体而言,采用多重中介方法和路径分析来衡量研究变量之间的关系。主要研究结果表明,远程工作经验对幸福感有直接和间接的积极影响,特别是通过工作与生活的平衡。虽然对远程工作的偏好加强了远程工作经验与幸福感之间的关系,但并没有增强中介模型的预测能力。原创性/价值COVID-19 作为一种突发性环境制约因素,迫使企业在没有适当规划和培训的情况下实施远程工作。因此,员工如何体验工作条件的这一重大变化影响了他们的幸福感。本文有助于澄清所提出的变量在这种限制条件下的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信