Analysis of Different PWM Techniques for Enhanced Ultrahigh Gain Z-Network Topology

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Vadthya Jagan, Bhavadish Chary Maheshwaram, Mallesh Usirikapally, Praveen Kumar Balachandran, B. Nagi Reddy, Sankeerthana Mettu, C. Dhanamjayulu, G. Arunkumar, K. C. Saranya, Baseem Khan
{"title":"Analysis of Different PWM Techniques for Enhanced Ultrahigh Gain Z-Network Topology","authors":"Vadthya Jagan,&nbsp;Bhavadish Chary Maheshwaram,&nbsp;Mallesh Usirikapally,&nbsp;Praveen Kumar Balachandran,&nbsp;B. Nagi Reddy,&nbsp;Sankeerthana Mettu,&nbsp;C. Dhanamjayulu,&nbsp;G. Arunkumar,&nbsp;K. C. Saranya,&nbsp;Baseem Khan","doi":"10.1155/2024/6645798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In these modern times, the Z-source inverters (ZSIs) have become a revolutionary invention ever since the year 2002. The pulse-width modulation (PWM) technique used for most of the ZSIs is simple boost control PWM (SBC-PWM), and the SBC-PWM implies for a greater voltage stress on the inverter bridge and provides less boost factor. Likewise, many topologies for the basic Z-source topologies are evolved, and different PWM techniques are applied to them such as maximum boost control (MBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC-THI), maximum constant boost control (MCBC), and constant boost control with third harmonic injection (CBC-THI). All these mentioned PWM techniques are compared, and the converter opted in this paper is an enhanced ultrahigh gain active-switched quasi-Z-source inverter (EUHG-qZSI). The comparisons discussed in this brief are bridge stress, voltage gain, and voltage boost variation under each control strategy implementation. The theoretical and simulation evaluation for the abovementioned findings is presented in this paper, and the best PWM among them is maximum boost control (MBC).</p>","PeriodicalId":51293,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6645798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In these modern times, the Z-source inverters (ZSIs) have become a revolutionary invention ever since the year 2002. The pulse-width modulation (PWM) technique used for most of the ZSIs is simple boost control PWM (SBC-PWM), and the SBC-PWM implies for a greater voltage stress on the inverter bridge and provides less boost factor. Likewise, many topologies for the basic Z-source topologies are evolved, and different PWM techniques are applied to them such as maximum boost control (MBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC-THI), maximum constant boost control (MCBC), and constant boost control with third harmonic injection (CBC-THI). All these mentioned PWM techniques are compared, and the converter opted in this paper is an enhanced ultrahigh gain active-switched quasi-Z-source inverter (EUHG-qZSI). The comparisons discussed in this brief are bridge stress, voltage gain, and voltage boost variation under each control strategy implementation. The theoretical and simulation evaluation for the abovementioned findings is presented in this paper, and the best PWM among them is maximum boost control (MBC).

针对增强型超高增益 Z 网络拓扑结构的不同 PWM 技术分析
自 2002 年以来,Z-source 逆变器(ZSI)已成为当今时代的一项革命性发明。大多数 ZSI 使用的脉宽调制(PWM)技术是简单升压控制 PWM(SBC-PWM),SBC-PWM 意味着逆变器桥上的电压压力更大,升压因子更低。同样,基本的 Z 源拓扑结构也演化出许多拓扑,并应用了不同的 PWM 技术,如最大升压控制 (MBC)、带三次谐波注入的最大升压控制 (MBC-THI)、最大恒定升压控制 (MCBC) 和带三次谐波注入的恒定升压控制 (CBC-THI)。本文对上述所有 PWM 技术进行了比较,并选择了一种增强型超高增益有源开关准 Z 源逆变器(EUHG-qZSI)。本文讨论的比较内容包括每种控制策略实施下的电桥应力、电压增益和电压升压变化。本文对上述结论进行了理论和仿真评估,其中最佳 PWM 是最大升压控制 (MBC)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
期刊介绍: International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems publishes original research results on key advances in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electrical energy systems. Of particular interest are submissions concerning the modeling, analysis, optimization and control of advanced electric power systems. Manuscripts on topics of economics, finance, policies, insulation materials, low-voltage power electronics, plasmas, and magnetics will generally not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信