Machine Learning to Develop Peptide Catalysts─Successes, Limitations, and Opportunities

IF 12.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tobias Schnitzer, Martin Schnurr, Andrew F. Zahrt, Nader Sakhaee, Scott E. Denmark* and Helma Wennemers*, 
{"title":"Machine Learning to Develop Peptide Catalysts─Successes, Limitations, and Opportunities","authors":"Tobias Schnitzer,&nbsp;Martin Schnurr,&nbsp;Andrew F. Zahrt,&nbsp;Nader Sakhaee,&nbsp;Scott E. Denmark* and Helma Wennemers*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acscentsci.3c01284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Peptides have been established as modular catalysts for various transformations. Still, the vast number of potential amino acid building blocks renders the identification of peptides with desired catalytic activity challenging. Here, we develop a machine-learning workflow for the optimization of peptide catalysts. First─in a hypothetical competition─we challenged our workflow to identify peptide catalysts for the conjugate addition reaction of aldehydes to nitroolefins and compared the performance of the predicted structures with those optimized in our laboratory. On the basis of the positive results, we established a universal training set (UTS) containing 161 catalysts to sample an <i>in silico</i> library of ∼30,000 tripeptide members. Finally, we challenged our machine learning strategy to identify a member of the library as a stereoselective catalyst for an annulation reaction that has not been catalyzed by a peptide thus far. We conclude with a comparison of data-driven versus expert-knowledge-guided peptide catalyst optimization.</p><p >Statistical learning methods were challenged to identify enantioselective peptide catalysts from a 30,000-member <i>in silico</i> library and compared with expert-knowledge-guided methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":10,"journal":{"name":"ACS Central Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acscentsci.3c01284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Central Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.3c01284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peptides have been established as modular catalysts for various transformations. Still, the vast number of potential amino acid building blocks renders the identification of peptides with desired catalytic activity challenging. Here, we develop a machine-learning workflow for the optimization of peptide catalysts. First─in a hypothetical competition─we challenged our workflow to identify peptide catalysts for the conjugate addition reaction of aldehydes to nitroolefins and compared the performance of the predicted structures with those optimized in our laboratory. On the basis of the positive results, we established a universal training set (UTS) containing 161 catalysts to sample an in silico library of ∼30,000 tripeptide members. Finally, we challenged our machine learning strategy to identify a member of the library as a stereoselective catalyst for an annulation reaction that has not been catalyzed by a peptide thus far. We conclude with a comparison of data-driven versus expert-knowledge-guided peptide catalyst optimization.

Statistical learning methods were challenged to identify enantioselective peptide catalysts from a 30,000-member in silico library and compared with expert-knowledge-guided methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习开发多肽催化剂--成功、局限与机遇
肽已被确定为各种转化的模块催化剂。然而,由于潜在的氨基酸结构单元数量庞大,要识别具有所需催化活性的多肽仍具有挑战性。在此,我们开发了一种优化多肽催化剂的机器学习工作流程。首先--在假设竞赛中--我们挑战我们的工作流程,以识别醛与硝基烯烃共轭加成反应的多肽催化剂,并将预测结构的性能与我们实验室优化的结构进行比较。在积极结果的基础上,我们建立了一个包含 161 种催化剂的通用训练集 (UTS),以对一个由 ∼30,000 种三肽组成的硅库进行采样。最后,我们对机器学习策略提出了挑战,要求将库中的一个成员鉴定为立体选择性催化剂,用于迄今为止尚未被肽催化的环化反应。最后,我们比较了数据驱动和专家知识指导下的多肽催化剂优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Central Science
ACS Central Science Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
0.50%
发文量
194
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ACS Central Science publishes significant primary reports on research in chemistry and allied fields where chemical approaches are pivotal. As the first fully open-access journal by the American Chemical Society, it covers compelling and important contributions to the broad chemistry and scientific community. "Central science," a term popularized nearly 40 years ago, emphasizes chemistry's central role in connecting physical and life sciences, and fundamental sciences with applied disciplines like medicine and engineering. The journal focuses on exceptional quality articles, addressing advances in fundamental chemistry and interdisciplinary research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信