Are shocks in the stock markets driven by commodity markets? Evidence from Russia-Ukraine war

IF 3.7 4区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Priti Biswas , Prachi Jain , Debasish Maitra
{"title":"Are shocks in the stock markets driven by commodity markets? Evidence from Russia-Ukraine war","authors":"Priti Biswas ,&nbsp;Prachi Jain ,&nbsp;Debasish Maitra","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the immediate impact of heightened geopolitical tensions caused by the Russia-Ukraine war, on volatility connectedness networks of 18 global stock markets and 5 major commodities. Our analyses reveal a shift in connectedness spillovers during the war: while crude oil (a net shock transmitter before the war) became a net shock receiver, shocks transmitted by crude oil net importers appear to primarily contribute to crude oil turning a net shock receiver, whereas for platinum and wheat, we observe that both net exporters and importers have received volatility shocks. We further dissect the impact of war on the direction of spillovers using panel censored regressions. Employing insights from the analyses, we design portfolios that weigh higher (lower) on stock indices with lower (higher) pairwise connectedness (PCI) to each commodity. We not only find these PCI-based portfolios to exhibit safe-haven properties under extreme geopolitical risk, but they also outperform an equally-weighted portfolio during a period of war. Finally, low-minus-high factors constructed on pairwise connectedness have significant explanatory power for portfolio returns, indicating connectedness as an additional factor for asset pricing models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851324000060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the immediate impact of heightened geopolitical tensions caused by the Russia-Ukraine war, on volatility connectedness networks of 18 global stock markets and 5 major commodities. Our analyses reveal a shift in connectedness spillovers during the war: while crude oil (a net shock transmitter before the war) became a net shock receiver, shocks transmitted by crude oil net importers appear to primarily contribute to crude oil turning a net shock receiver, whereas for platinum and wheat, we observe that both net exporters and importers have received volatility shocks. We further dissect the impact of war on the direction of spillovers using panel censored regressions. Employing insights from the analyses, we design portfolios that weigh higher (lower) on stock indices with lower (higher) pairwise connectedness (PCI) to each commodity. We not only find these PCI-based portfolios to exhibit safe-haven properties under extreme geopolitical risk, but they also outperform an equally-weighted portfolio during a period of war. Finally, low-minus-high factors constructed on pairwise connectedness have significant explanatory power for portfolio returns, indicating connectedness as an additional factor for asset pricing models.

股票市场的冲击是由商品市场驱动的吗?俄罗斯-乌克兰战争的证据
我们研究了俄乌战争导致的地缘政治紧张局势加剧对 18 个全球股市和 5 种主要商品的波动性关联网络的直接影响。我们的分析揭示了战争期间连通性溢出效应的变化:原油(战争前的净冲击传播者)变成了净冲击接收者,原油净进口国传播的冲击似乎是原油变成净冲击接收者的主要原因,而对于铂金和小麦,我们观察到净出口国和进口国都收到了波动冲击。我们利用面板删减回归进一步剖析了战争对溢出方向的影响。利用分析得出的见解,我们设计了一些投资组合,对与每种商品成对关联度(PCI)较低(较高)的股票指数给予较高(较低)的权重。我们不仅发现这些基于 PCI 的投资组合在极端地缘政治风险下表现出避险属性,而且在战争时期表现优于等权重投资组合。最后,基于成对关联性构建的低减高因子对投资组合回报具有显著的解释力,这表明关联性是资产定价模型的附加因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信