Experimental Study on Mixed-Mode (I–II) Fracture Toughness of Freshwater Ice

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yaozhong Xu, Mao Zhou, Xian Yi, Wen Hua, Jiuzhou Huang, Wenyu Zhang, Shiming Dong
{"title":"Experimental Study on Mixed-Mode (I–II) Fracture Toughness of Freshwater Ice","authors":"Yaozhong Xu,&nbsp;Mao Zhou,&nbsp;Xian Yi,&nbsp;Wen Hua,&nbsp;Jiuzhou Huang,&nbsp;Wenyu Zhang,&nbsp;Shiming Dong","doi":"10.1007/s10338-023-00458-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the issue of aircraft icing has gained widespread recognition. The breaking and detachment of dynamic ice can pose a threat to flight safety. However, the shedding and fracture mechanisms of dynamic ice are unclear and cannot meet the engineering needs of ice-shedding hazard assessment. Therefore, studying the fracture toughness of ice bodies has extremely important practical significance. To address this issue, this article uses a centrally cracked Brazilian disk (CCBD) specimen to measure the pure mode I toughness and pure mode II fracture toughness of freshwater ice at different loading rates. The mixed-mode (I–II) fracture characteristics of ice are discussed, and the experimental results are compared and analyzed with the theoretical values of the generalized maximum tangential stress (GMTS) criterion considering the influence of <i>T</i>-stress. The results indicated that as the loading rate increases, the pure mode I toughness and pure mode II fracture toughness of freshwater ice decrease, and the fracture toughness of freshwater ice is more sensitive to the loading rate. In terms of fracture criteria, the theoretical value of the ratio of pure mode II fracture toughness to pure mode I fracture toughness based on the GMTS criterion is in good agreement with the experimental value, while the theoretical value based on the maximum tangential stress (MTS) criterion deviates significantly from the experimental value, indicating that the GMTS criterion considering the influence of <i>T</i>-stress can better predict the experimental results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50892,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica","volume":"37 2","pages":"252 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10338-023-00458-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10338-023-00458-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the issue of aircraft icing has gained widespread recognition. The breaking and detachment of dynamic ice can pose a threat to flight safety. However, the shedding and fracture mechanisms of dynamic ice are unclear and cannot meet the engineering needs of ice-shedding hazard assessment. Therefore, studying the fracture toughness of ice bodies has extremely important practical significance. To address this issue, this article uses a centrally cracked Brazilian disk (CCBD) specimen to measure the pure mode I toughness and pure mode II fracture toughness of freshwater ice at different loading rates. The mixed-mode (I–II) fracture characteristics of ice are discussed, and the experimental results are compared and analyzed with the theoretical values of the generalized maximum tangential stress (GMTS) criterion considering the influence of T-stress. The results indicated that as the loading rate increases, the pure mode I toughness and pure mode II fracture toughness of freshwater ice decrease, and the fracture toughness of freshwater ice is more sensitive to the loading rate. In terms of fracture criteria, the theoretical value of the ratio of pure mode II fracture toughness to pure mode I fracture toughness based on the GMTS criterion is in good agreement with the experimental value, while the theoretical value based on the maximum tangential stress (MTS) criterion deviates significantly from the experimental value, indicating that the GMTS criterion considering the influence of T-stress can better predict the experimental results.

淡水冰混合模式(I-II)断裂韧性实验研究
摘要 近年来,飞机结冰问题已得到广泛关注。动态冰的破碎和脱落会对飞行安全造成威胁。然而,动态冰的脱落和断裂机理尚不清楚,无法满足冰脱落危险评估的工程需要。因此,研究冰体的断裂韧性具有极其重要的现实意义。针对这一问题,本文利用中心开裂的巴西圆盘(CCBD)试样,测量了淡水冰在不同加载速率下的纯模式 I 韧性和纯模式 II 断裂韧性。讨论了冰的混合模式(I-II)断裂特性,并将实验结果与考虑 T 应力影响的广义最大切向应力(GMTS)准则的理论值进行了比较和分析。结果表明,随着加载速率的增加,淡水冰的纯模式 I 韧度和纯模式 II 断裂韧度均有所下降,淡水冰的断裂韧度对加载速率更为敏感。在断裂准则方面,基于 GMTS 准则的纯模式 II 断裂韧度与纯模式 I 断裂韧度之比理论值与实验值吻合较好,而基于最大切向应力(MTS)准则的理论值与实验值偏差较大,说明考虑 T 应力影响的 GMTS 准则能更好地预测实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1088
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica aims to become the best journal of solid mechanics in China and a worldwide well-known one in the field of mechanics, by providing original, perspective and even breakthrough theories and methods for the research on solid mechanics. The Journal is devoted to the publication of research papers in English in all fields of solid-state mechanics and its related disciplines in science, technology and engineering, with a balanced coverage on analytical, experimental, numerical and applied investigations. Articles, Short Communications, Discussions on previously published papers, and invitation-based Reviews are published bimonthly. The maximum length of an article is 30 pages, including equations, figures and tables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信