The inclusion of children in divorce mediation: A continental ‘non-directive’ approach

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Robin Brzobohatý
{"title":"The inclusion of children in divorce mediation: A continental ‘non-directive’ approach","authors":"Robin Brzobohatý","doi":"10.1002/crq.21423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article undertakes an interdisciplinary examination of child-inclusive mediation (CIM) in divorce and separation mediation, particularly its implementation in the Czech Republic through the Mediation and Education Centre in Brno (MEDUC). It aims to offer a comparative analysis of MEDUC's unique non-directive mediation model, which involves children's active participation in mediation processes, in contrast to the original Australian model of Child-Inclusive Mediation and Counseling (CIMC). This paper uses a structured theoretical methodology combining comparative and conceptual analysis. Specifically, the comparative approach contrasts Australian and Czech practices and reveals key differences and similarities in legal frameworks, philosophical theories, and the roles of mediators and child specialists. Meanwhile, the conceptual analysis draws on an extensive literature review to explore the theoretical underpinnings of Australian and Czech family mediation approaches. The study identifies considerable flexibility in adapting CIP models in different legal and cultural settings. Although Australian practices heavily influence MEDUC, it has adapted these principles to fit its legal and cultural context. The article highlights the potential of combining human rights and therapeutic approaches, augmented by developmental psychology and international child rights standards, to create a more nuanced and child-sensitive mediation practice. The article highlights the value of a multidisciplinary, adaptive approach to practice involving children in family mediation. It suggests that integrating psychological and legal-philosophical theories can lead to a robust model that can be adapted to different cultural and legal settings. It advocates for future research to empirically evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of these adapted models and explore how cultural perceptions of childhood and family roles may influence the success of CIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":39736,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crq.21423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article undertakes an interdisciplinary examination of child-inclusive mediation (CIM) in divorce and separation mediation, particularly its implementation in the Czech Republic through the Mediation and Education Centre in Brno (MEDUC). It aims to offer a comparative analysis of MEDUC's unique non-directive mediation model, which involves children's active participation in mediation processes, in contrast to the original Australian model of Child-Inclusive Mediation and Counseling (CIMC). This paper uses a structured theoretical methodology combining comparative and conceptual analysis. Specifically, the comparative approach contrasts Australian and Czech practices and reveals key differences and similarities in legal frameworks, philosophical theories, and the roles of mediators and child specialists. Meanwhile, the conceptual analysis draws on an extensive literature review to explore the theoretical underpinnings of Australian and Czech family mediation approaches. The study identifies considerable flexibility in adapting CIP models in different legal and cultural settings. Although Australian practices heavily influence MEDUC, it has adapted these principles to fit its legal and cultural context. The article highlights the potential of combining human rights and therapeutic approaches, augmented by developmental psychology and international child rights standards, to create a more nuanced and child-sensitive mediation practice. The article highlights the value of a multidisciplinary, adaptive approach to practice involving children in family mediation. It suggests that integrating psychological and legal-philosophical theories can lead to a robust model that can be adapted to different cultural and legal settings. It advocates for future research to empirically evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of these adapted models and explore how cultural perceptions of childhood and family roles may influence the success of CIP.

将儿童纳入离婚调解:大陆的 "非指导性 "方法
本文对离婚和分居调解中的儿童全纳调解(CIM)进行了跨学科研究,特别是通过布尔诺调解和教育中心(MEDUC)在捷克共和国实施该模式的情况。本文旨在对 MEDUC 独特的非指导性调解模式进行比较分析,该模式让儿童积极参与调解过程,与澳大利亚最初的儿童全纳调解与咨询(CIMC)模式形成鲜明对比。本文采用结构化理论方法,将比较分析与概念分析相结合。具体而言,比较法对比了澳大利亚和捷克的做法,揭示了法律框架、哲学理论以及调解员和儿童专家的角色等方面的主要异同。同时,概念分析借鉴了广泛的文献综述,探讨了澳大利亚和捷克家事调解方法的理论基础。研究发现,在不同的法律和文化背景下调整 CIP 模式具有相当大的灵活性。虽然澳大利亚的做法深受 MEDUC 的影响,但它对这些原则进行了调整,以适应其法律和文化背景。文章强调了将人权与治疗方法相结合,并辅以发展心理学和国际儿童权利标准的潜力,以创造一种更加细致入微、对儿童更加敏感的调解做法。文章强调了在涉及儿童的家事调解实践中采用多学科、适应性方法的价值。文章认为,将心理学和法律哲学理论结合起来,可以建立一个适应不同文化和法律环境的稳健模式。它主张今后开展研究,以实证方式评估这些经过调整的模式的有效性和可持续性,并探讨对儿童和家庭角色的文化观念可能如何影响 CIP 的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes quality scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. A defining focus of the journal is the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Articles address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, and how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice. Articles also focus on all aspects of the conflict resolution process and context with primary focus on the behavior, role, and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信