Postdoctoral Scholar Recruitment and Hiring Practices in STEM: A Pilot Study

Meagan Heirwegh, Douglas C Rees, Lindsey Malcom-Piqueux
{"title":"Postdoctoral Scholar Recruitment and Hiring Practices in STEM: A Pilot Study","authors":"Meagan Heirwegh, Douglas C Rees, Lindsey Malcom-Piqueux","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.12.580018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the importance of the postdoctoral position in the training of scientists for independent research careers, few studies have addressed recruiting and hiring of postdocs. We conducted a pilot study on postdoctoral hiring in the Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology to serve as a starting point to better understand postdoctoral recruiting and hiring processes. From this survey of both postdocs and faculty, together with the available literature, the picture emerges that the postdoc hiring process is more decentralized than either faculty hiring or graduate admissions. Postdoc positions are often filled through a passive process where the initial expression of interest from a prospective postdoc is through a 'cold-call' contact to a prospective advisor. Individual faculty members are often responsible for developing and implementing their own outreach and recruitment plans and deciding who to hire into a postdoc position. The overall opacity of the processes and practices by which postdocs are identified, recruited, and hired make it difficult to pinpoint where interventions could be effective to ensure equitable hiring practices. Implementation of such practices is critical to training a diverse postdoc population and subsequently of the future STEM faculty recruited from this group.","PeriodicalId":501568,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.12.580018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of the postdoctoral position in the training of scientists for independent research careers, few studies have addressed recruiting and hiring of postdocs. We conducted a pilot study on postdoctoral hiring in the Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology to serve as a starting point to better understand postdoctoral recruiting and hiring processes. From this survey of both postdocs and faculty, together with the available literature, the picture emerges that the postdoc hiring process is more decentralized than either faculty hiring or graduate admissions. Postdoc positions are often filled through a passive process where the initial expression of interest from a prospective postdoc is through a 'cold-call' contact to a prospective advisor. Individual faculty members are often responsible for developing and implementing their own outreach and recruitment plans and deciding who to hire into a postdoc position. The overall opacity of the processes and practices by which postdocs are identified, recruited, and hired make it difficult to pinpoint where interventions could be effective to ensure equitable hiring practices. Implementation of such practices is critical to training a diverse postdoc population and subsequently of the future STEM faculty recruited from this group.
科学、技术、工程和数学领域的博士后学者招聘和雇用实践:一项试点研究
尽管博士后职位在培养科学家从事独立研究事业方面非常重要,但很少有研究涉及博士后的招聘和雇用。我们在加州理工学院化学与化学工程系开展了一项博士后聘用试点研究,以此为起点,更好地了解博士后的招聘和聘用流程。通过对博士后和教职员工的调查,以及现有的文献资料,我们发现博士后的聘用过程比教职员工的聘用或研究生的录取更加分散。博士后职位通常是通过一个被动的过程来填补的,即未来的博士后通过 "冷电话 "联系未来的导师来表达最初的兴趣。个别教师往往负责制定和实施自己的外联和招聘计划,并决定聘用谁来担任博士后职位。发现、招聘和聘用博士后的过程和做法总体上并不透明,因此很难确定在哪些方面采取有效的干预措施,以确保公平的聘用做法。实施这些做法对于培养多样化的博士后群体以及随后从这一群体中招聘的未来 STEM 教师至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信