Improving collaborative problem-solving skills via automated feedback and scaffolding: a quasi-experimental study with CPSCoach 2.0

IF 3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Sidney K. D’Mello, Nicholas Duran, Amanda Michaels, Angela E. B. Stewart
{"title":"Improving collaborative problem-solving skills via automated feedback and scaffolding: a quasi-experimental study with CPSCoach 2.0","authors":"Sidney K. D’Mello, Nicholas Duran, Amanda Michaels, Angela E. B. Stewart","doi":"10.1007/s11257-023-09387-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present CPSCoach 2.0, an automated system that provides feedback, instructional scaffolding, and practice to help individuals improve three collaborative problem-solving (CPS) skills drawn from a theoretical CPS framework: construction of shared knowledge, negotiation/coordination, and maintaining team function. CPSCoach 2.0 was developed and tested in the context of computer-mediated collaboration (video conferencing) with an educational game. It automatically analyzes users’ speech during a round of collaborative gameplay to provide personalized feedback and to select a target CPS skill for improvement. After multiple cycles of iterative testing and refinement, we tested CPSCoach 2.0 in a user study where 21 dyads (<i>n</i> = 42) completed four rounds of feedback and scaffolding embedded within five rounds of game-play in a single session. Using a quasi-experimental matching procedure, we found that the use of CPSCoach 2.0 was associated with improvement in CPS skill development compared to matched controls. Further, users found the automated feedback to be moderately accurate and had positive perceptions of the system, and these impressions were stronger for those who received higher scores overall. Results demonstrate the use of automated feedback and instructional scaffolds to support the development of CPS skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":49388,"journal":{"name":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09387-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present CPSCoach 2.0, an automated system that provides feedback, instructional scaffolding, and practice to help individuals improve three collaborative problem-solving (CPS) skills drawn from a theoretical CPS framework: construction of shared knowledge, negotiation/coordination, and maintaining team function. CPSCoach 2.0 was developed and tested in the context of computer-mediated collaboration (video conferencing) with an educational game. It automatically analyzes users’ speech during a round of collaborative gameplay to provide personalized feedback and to select a target CPS skill for improvement. After multiple cycles of iterative testing and refinement, we tested CPSCoach 2.0 in a user study where 21 dyads (n = 42) completed four rounds of feedback and scaffolding embedded within five rounds of game-play in a single session. Using a quasi-experimental matching procedure, we found that the use of CPSCoach 2.0 was associated with improvement in CPS skill development compared to matched controls. Further, users found the automated feedback to be moderately accurate and had positive perceptions of the system, and these impressions were stronger for those who received higher scores overall. Results demonstrate the use of automated feedback and instructional scaffolds to support the development of CPS skills.

Abstract Image

通过自动反馈和脚手架提高协作解决问题的能力:CPSCoach 2.0 准实验研究
我们介绍的 CPSCoach 2.0 是一个自动化系统,它提供反馈、教学支架和练习,帮助个人提高协作解决问题(CPS)理论框架中的三种技能:构建共享知识、协商/协调和维护团队功能。CPSCoach 2.0 是在计算机辅助协作(视频会议)和教育游戏的背景下开发和测试的。它能自动分析用户在一轮协作游戏中的发言,以提供个性化反馈,并选择需要改进的目标 CPS 技能。经过多次反复测试和改进,我们在一项用户研究中对 CPSCoach 2.0 进行了测试,21 个二人组(n = 42)在一次会议中完成了嵌入在五轮游戏中的四轮反馈和支架。通过准实验匹配程序,我们发现与匹配的对照组相比,CPSCoach 2.0 的使用与 CPS 技能发展的提高有关。此外,用户认为自动反馈的准确度适中,并对该系统有积极的看法,而对于那些总分较高的用户来说,这些看法更为强烈。研究结果表明,自动反馈和教学支架可用于支持 CPS 技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction provides an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of novel and significant original research results about interactive computer systems that can adapt themselves to their users, and on the design, use, and evaluation of user models for adaptation. The journal publishes high-quality original papers from, e.g., the following areas: acquisition and formal representation of user models; conceptual models and user stereotypes for personalization; student modeling and adaptive learning; models of groups of users; user model driven personalised information discovery and retrieval; recommender systems; adaptive user interfaces and agents; adaptation for accessibility and inclusion; generic user modeling systems and tools; interoperability of user models; personalization in areas such as; affective computing; ubiquitous and mobile computing; language based interactions; multi-modal interactions; virtual and augmented reality; social media and the Web; human-robot interaction; behaviour change interventions; personalized applications in specific domains; privacy, accountability, and security of information for personalization; responsible adaptation: fairness, accountability, explainability, transparency and control; methods for the design and evaluation of user models and adaptive systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信