Associations between genetically predicted iron status and cardiovascular disease risk: A Mendelian randomization study

Alexa Barad, Andrew G Clark, Kimberly O O'Brien, Eva K Pressman
{"title":"Associations between genetically predicted iron status and cardiovascular disease risk: A Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Alexa Barad, Andrew G Clark, Kimberly O O'Brien, Eva K Pressman","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.05.24302373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mendelian randomization (MR) studies suggest a causal effect of iron (Fe) status on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but it is unknown if these associations are confounded by pleiotropic effects of the instrumental variables (IV) on CVD risk factors. We aimed to investigate the effect of Fe status on CVD risk controlling for CVD risk factors. Methods: Fe biomarker IVs (total Fe binding capacity (TIBC, n=208,422), transferrin saturation (TSAT, n=198,516), serum Fe (SI, n=236,612), ferritin (n=257,953)) were selected from a European GWAS meta-analysis. We performed two-sample univariate (UV) MR of each Fe trait on CVD outcomes (all-cause ischemic stroke (IS), cardioembolic IS (CES), large artery IS (LAS), small vessel IS (SVS), and coronary heart disease (CHD)) from MEGASTROKE (n=440,328) and CARDIoGRAMplusC4D (n=183,305). We then implemented multivariate (MV) MR conditioning on six CVD risk factors from independent European samples to evaluate their potential confounding and/or mediating effects on the observed Fe-CVD associations. Results: With UVMR analyses, we found higher genetically predicted Fe status to be associated with a greater risk of CES (TSAT: OR 1.17 [95%CI 1.03, 1.33], SI: OR 1.21 [ 95%CI 1.02, 1.44]; TIBC: OR 0.81 [95%CI 0.69, 0.94]). The detrimental effects of Fe status on CES risk remained unaffected when adjusting for CVD risk factors (all P<0.05). Additionally, we found diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to mediate between 7.1-8.8% of the total effect of Fe status on CES incidence. While UVMR initially suggested a protective effect of Fe status on LAS and CHD, MVMR analyses factoring CVD risk factors revealed a complete annulment of this perceived protective effect (all P>0.05).\nDiscussion: Higher Fe status was associated with a greater risk of CES independent of CVD risk factors, and this effect was partly mediated by DBP. These findings support a role of Fe status as a modifiable risk factor for CES.","PeriodicalId":501073,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nutrition","volume":"254 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.05.24302373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mendelian randomization (MR) studies suggest a causal effect of iron (Fe) status on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but it is unknown if these associations are confounded by pleiotropic effects of the instrumental variables (IV) on CVD risk factors. We aimed to investigate the effect of Fe status on CVD risk controlling for CVD risk factors. Methods: Fe biomarker IVs (total Fe binding capacity (TIBC, n=208,422), transferrin saturation (TSAT, n=198,516), serum Fe (SI, n=236,612), ferritin (n=257,953)) were selected from a European GWAS meta-analysis. We performed two-sample univariate (UV) MR of each Fe trait on CVD outcomes (all-cause ischemic stroke (IS), cardioembolic IS (CES), large artery IS (LAS), small vessel IS (SVS), and coronary heart disease (CHD)) from MEGASTROKE (n=440,328) and CARDIoGRAMplusC4D (n=183,305). We then implemented multivariate (MV) MR conditioning on six CVD risk factors from independent European samples to evaluate their potential confounding and/or mediating effects on the observed Fe-CVD associations. Results: With UVMR analyses, we found higher genetically predicted Fe status to be associated with a greater risk of CES (TSAT: OR 1.17 [95%CI 1.03, 1.33], SI: OR 1.21 [ 95%CI 1.02, 1.44]; TIBC: OR 0.81 [95%CI 0.69, 0.94]). The detrimental effects of Fe status on CES risk remained unaffected when adjusting for CVD risk factors (all P<0.05). Additionally, we found diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to mediate between 7.1-8.8% of the total effect of Fe status on CES incidence. While UVMR initially suggested a protective effect of Fe status on LAS and CHD, MVMR analyses factoring CVD risk factors revealed a complete annulment of this perceived protective effect (all P>0.05). Discussion: Higher Fe status was associated with a greater risk of CES independent of CVD risk factors, and this effect was partly mediated by DBP. These findings support a role of Fe status as a modifiable risk factor for CES.
基因预测铁状态与心血管疾病风险之间的关系:孟德尔随机研究
背景:孟德尔随机化(MR)研究表明,铁(Fe)状态对心血管疾病(CVD)风险具有因果效应,但尚不清楚这些关联是否受到工具变量(IV)对心血管疾病风险因素的多向效应的干扰。我们的目的是在控制心血管疾病风险因素的情况下,研究铁的状况对心血管疾病风险的影响。研究方法从一项欧洲 GWAS meta 分析中筛选出铁元素生物标志物 IV(总铁结合能力(TIBC,n=208422)、转铁蛋白饱和度(TSAT,n=198516)、血清铁(SI,n=236612)、铁蛋白(n=257953))。我们从 MEGASTROKE(n=440,328)和 CARDIoGRAMplusC4D(n=183,305)中选取了铁蛋白(SI)(n=236,612)和铁蛋白(SVS)(n=257,953),对每个铁蛋白性状对心血管疾病(全因缺血性中风(IS)、心肌栓塞性中风(CES)、大动脉中风(LAS)、小血管中风(SVS)和冠心病(CHD))结局的影响进行了双样本单变量(UV)MR分析。然后,我们对来自独立欧洲样本的六个心血管疾病风险因素实施了多变量(MV)磁共振条件分析,以评估它们对所观察到的铁-心血管疾病关联的潜在混杂和/或中介效应。结果:通过 UVMR 分析,我们发现较高的遗传预测铁含量与较高的 CES 风险相关(TSAT:或 1.17 [95%ci 1.03, 1.33],SI:或 1.21 [ 95%ci 1.02, 1.44];TIBC:或 0.81 [95%ci 0.69, 0.94])。在对心血管疾病风险因素进行调整后,铁含量对 CES 风险的不利影响仍然不受影响(所有 P<0.05)。此外,我们还发现舒张压(DBP)介导了铁含量对 CES 发生率总影响的 7.1-8.8%。虽然 UVMR 最初表明铁状况对 LAS 和冠心病有保护作用,但考虑到心血管疾病风险因素的 MVMR 分析表明,这种保护作用被完全取消(所有 P>0.05):讨论:铁含量越高,患 CES 的风险越大,不受心血管疾病风险因素的影响,而且这种影响部分由 DBP 介导。这些研究结果表明,铁的状况是导致 CES 的一个可改变的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信