Optimizing solar PV investments: A comprehensive decision-making index using CRITIC and TOPSIS

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Nur Iqtiyani Ilham , Nofri Yenita Dahlan , Mohamad Zhafran Hussin
{"title":"Optimizing solar PV investments: A comprehensive decision-making index using CRITIC and TOPSIS","authors":"Nur Iqtiyani Ilham ,&nbsp;Nofri Yenita Dahlan ,&nbsp;Mohamad Zhafran Hussin","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to Malaysia's commitment to sustainable energy, a decisive decision for renewable energy planning investment remains crucial. Currently, a dedicated tool for assessing the benefits of renewable energy deployment in Malaysia is absent, posing challenges for stakeholders, especially prosumers, in making project investment decisions. This study introduces the development of Multi-Benefits Decision-Making (MBDM) index for solar photovoltaic (PV) investment planning. The aim is to select the most optimal renewable energy compensation schemes under multiple tariff structures and solar PV capacities. The proposed CRITIC weight, integrated with the Technique-for-Order-of-Preference-by-Similarity-to-the-Ideal-Solution (TOPSIS), or to be named as CW-TOPSIS framework, is practically demonstrated through a case study involving a commercial building with a solar PV rooftop. The Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) grid software is used to develop a grid-connected solar PV model. Subsequently, a decision matrix is created using HOMER grid optimization results, incorporating indicators like environmental factors, energy usage, tariffs and policies, and economic aspects. A comparative study with Entropy-TOPSIS (EW-TOPSIS), CRITIC-Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (CW-ELECTRE), and Entropy-ELECTRE (EW-ELECTRE) is conducted to validate the proposed technique's performance. The consistent findings from the comparative study validate the outstanding performance of Net-Energy-Metering 2.0 with Enhanced-Time-of-Use (N2ET). N2ET excels due to its efficient integration of solar PV NEM and dynamic ETOU pricing, amplifying surplus energy trading and benefiting users with improved financial metrics and bill savings.</p><p>This research envisions guiding stakeholders in solar PV investments and enhancing project feasibility assessments in Malaysia's commercial sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100551"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to Malaysia's commitment to sustainable energy, a decisive decision for renewable energy planning investment remains crucial. Currently, a dedicated tool for assessing the benefits of renewable energy deployment in Malaysia is absent, posing challenges for stakeholders, especially prosumers, in making project investment decisions. This study introduces the development of Multi-Benefits Decision-Making (MBDM) index for solar photovoltaic (PV) investment planning. The aim is to select the most optimal renewable energy compensation schemes under multiple tariff structures and solar PV capacities. The proposed CRITIC weight, integrated with the Technique-for-Order-of-Preference-by-Similarity-to-the-Ideal-Solution (TOPSIS), or to be named as CW-TOPSIS framework, is practically demonstrated through a case study involving a commercial building with a solar PV rooftop. The Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) grid software is used to develop a grid-connected solar PV model. Subsequently, a decision matrix is created using HOMER grid optimization results, incorporating indicators like environmental factors, energy usage, tariffs and policies, and economic aspects. A comparative study with Entropy-TOPSIS (EW-TOPSIS), CRITIC-Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (CW-ELECTRE), and Entropy-ELECTRE (EW-ELECTRE) is conducted to validate the proposed technique's performance. The consistent findings from the comparative study validate the outstanding performance of Net-Energy-Metering 2.0 with Enhanced-Time-of-Use (N2ET). N2ET excels due to its efficient integration of solar PV NEM and dynamic ETOU pricing, amplifying surplus energy trading and benefiting users with improved financial metrics and bill savings.

This research envisions guiding stakeholders in solar PV investments and enhancing project feasibility assessments in Malaysia's commercial sector.

优化太阳能光伏投资:使用 CRITIC 和 TOPSIS 的综合决策指数
为响应马来西亚对可持续能源的承诺,可再生能源规划投资的决定性决策仍然至关重要。目前,马来西亚还没有专门用于评估可再生能源部署效益的工具,这给利益相关者,尤其是消费者,在做出项目投资决策时带来了挑战。本研究介绍了用于太阳能光伏(PV)投资规划的多效益决策(MBDM)指数的开发。其目的是在多种电价结构和太阳能光伏发电能力下选择最优的可再生能源补偿方案。所提出的 CRITIC 权重与 "通过与理想解决方案相似度进行优先排序的技术(TOPSIS)"(或命名为 CW-TOPSIS 框架)相结合,通过一项涉及带有太阳能光伏屋顶的商业建筑的案例研究进行了实际演示。多能源资源混合优化(HOMER)电网软件用于开发太阳能光伏并网模型。随后,利用 HOMER 电网优化结果,结合环境因素、能源使用、电价和政策以及经济方面等指标,创建了一个决策矩阵。与熵-TOPSIS(EW-TOPSIS)、CRITIC-Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality(CW-ELECTRE)和熵-ELECTRE(EW-ELECTRE)进行比较研究,以验证建议技术的性能。比较研究的一致结果验证了具有增强使用时间(N2ET)功能的净能源计量 2.0 的卓越性能。N2ET 将太阳能光伏发电净能源计量与动态 ETOU 定价有效结合,扩大了剩余能源交易,并通过改善财务指标和节省账单使用户受益,因此表现出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信