Oil fiscal regime and national oil companies. The hydrocarbon sector in Argentina 2003–2022

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Juan M. Ramírez-Cendrero , Eszter Wirth
{"title":"Oil fiscal regime and national oil companies. The hydrocarbon sector in Argentina 2003–2022","authors":"Juan M. Ramírez-Cendrero ,&nbsp;Eszter Wirth","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2023.101399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Argentinian hydrocarbon sector's performance has displayed distinctive characteristics when compared to other Latin American experiences, as the ones in Brazil, Bolivia or Ecuador. State control over the sector has been the common feature among these experiences, but in the Argentinian case it has been deployed cautiously since 2003. Only since 2012 did State involvement become more prominent through the Hydrocarbon Sovereignty Act, as it had been delimited to prices, access to supply and taxes on exports until 2011. This strategy was partially interrupted after Mauricio Macri's victory in the 2015 presidential elections. Based on these changes, to what extent did the model consolidated with the 2012 act represent a radical change or a mere adjustment in the dynamics of Argentina's oil and gas sector? How did the oil model implemented in the 2003–2015 period affect the dynamics of the sector and what were the implications of these changes? And, taking into account the return of liberalizing policies under the mandate of Mauricio Macri and certain return to extractivism under that of Alberto Fernández, what lessons can be derived from the Argentinian case for the configuration of oil policies focused on achieving energy self-sufficiency and on changing the productive matrix? Answering these questions is the objective of this work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X23001879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Argentinian hydrocarbon sector's performance has displayed distinctive characteristics when compared to other Latin American experiences, as the ones in Brazil, Bolivia or Ecuador. State control over the sector has been the common feature among these experiences, but in the Argentinian case it has been deployed cautiously since 2003. Only since 2012 did State involvement become more prominent through the Hydrocarbon Sovereignty Act, as it had been delimited to prices, access to supply and taxes on exports until 2011. This strategy was partially interrupted after Mauricio Macri's victory in the 2015 presidential elections. Based on these changes, to what extent did the model consolidated with the 2012 act represent a radical change or a mere adjustment in the dynamics of Argentina's oil and gas sector? How did the oil model implemented in the 2003–2015 period affect the dynamics of the sector and what were the implications of these changes? And, taking into account the return of liberalizing policies under the mandate of Mauricio Macri and certain return to extractivism under that of Alberto Fernández, what lessons can be derived from the Argentinian case for the configuration of oil policies focused on achieving energy self-sufficiency and on changing the productive matrix? Answering these questions is the objective of this work.

石油财政制度和国家石油公司。2003-2022 年阿根廷的碳氢化合物部门
与巴西、玻利维亚或厄瓜多尔等其他拉美国家的经验相比,阿根廷碳氢化合物部门的表现呈现出与众不同的特点。国家对该部门的控制是这些经验的共同特点,但就阿根廷而言,自 2003 年以来,国家对该部门的控制一直很谨慎。直到 2012 年,通过《碳氢化合物主权法》,国家的参与才变得更加突出,而在 2011 年之前,国家的参与仅限于价格、供应渠道和出口税。毛里西奥-马克里在 2015 年总统选举中获胜后,这一战略被部分中断。基于这些变化,2012 年法案所巩固的模式在多大程度上代表了阿根廷石油和天然气行业动态的彻底改变或单纯调整?2003-2015 年期间实施的石油模式对该行业的动态有何影响?考虑到毛里西奥-马克里任期内自由化政策的回归和阿尔贝托-费尔南德斯任期内采掘主义的某种回归,从阿根廷的案例中可以得出哪些经验教训,用于配置以实现能源自给自足和改变生产矩阵为重点的石油政策?回答这些问题是本著作的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信