On two mechanisms in job rotation problems

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Yu Gu, Yongchao Zhang
{"title":"On two mechanisms in job rotation problems","authors":"Yu Gu,&nbsp;Yongchao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study a class of priority-based allocation problems, the general job rotation problems first proposed by Yu and Zhang (2020), in which each position is occupied by at most one agent, and each agent occupies at most one position. The priority structure is that at each occupied position, its occupant has the lowest priority while all other agents have equal highest priority; at other positions, all agents have equal priority. This priority structure is the “opposite” to that in house allocation with existing tenants (HET) problem proposed by Abdulkadiroğlu and Sönmez (1999). We propose two constrained efficient mechanisms: one is the <em>modified top trading cycles</em> mechanism, the other is the <em>you request my position, I get your turn</em> mechanism. Both of the two mechanisms are adapted from mechanisms in the HET model. In a special setup that there are equal numbers of agents and positions, each agent occupies exactly one position, and all positions are acceptable for all agents, these two mechanisms yield the same outcome, which is also the outcome of the <em>backward-induction top trading cycles</em> mechanism proposed by Yu and Zhang (2020). In such a setup, our two mechanisms are also weakly group strategy-proof.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406824000211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study a class of priority-based allocation problems, the general job rotation problems first proposed by Yu and Zhang (2020), in which each position is occupied by at most one agent, and each agent occupies at most one position. The priority structure is that at each occupied position, its occupant has the lowest priority while all other agents have equal highest priority; at other positions, all agents have equal priority. This priority structure is the “opposite” to that in house allocation with existing tenants (HET) problem proposed by Abdulkadiroğlu and Sönmez (1999). We propose two constrained efficient mechanisms: one is the modified top trading cycles mechanism, the other is the you request my position, I get your turn mechanism. Both of the two mechanisms are adapted from mechanisms in the HET model. In a special setup that there are equal numbers of agents and positions, each agent occupies exactly one position, and all positions are acceptable for all agents, these two mechanisms yield the same outcome, which is also the outcome of the backward-induction top trading cycles mechanism proposed by Yu and Zhang (2020). In such a setup, our two mechanisms are also weakly group strategy-proof.

论工作轮换问题中的两种机制
我们研究的是一类基于优先级的分配问题,即 Yu 和 Zhang(2020 年)首次提出的一般工作轮换问题,其中每个位置最多由一个代理占据,每个代理最多占据一个位置。优先级结构是:在每个被占用的位置上,其占用者的优先级最低,而其他代理人的优先级最高;在其他位置上,所有代理人的优先级相同。这种优先级结构与 Abdulkadiroğlu 和 Sönmez(1999 年)提出的现有租户房屋分配(HET)问题中的优先级结构 "截然相反"。我们提出了两种受限的高效机制:一种是修改后的顶级交易周期机制,另一种是你要求我的位置,我得到你的位置机制。这两种机制都是根据 HET 模型中的机制改编的。在代理人和头寸数量相等、每个代理人正好占据一个头寸、所有头寸对所有代理人来说都是可接受的特殊情况下,这两种机制会产生相同的结果,这也是 Yu 和 Zhang(2020)提出的后向诱导顶层交易循环机制的结果。在这种情况下,我们的两种机制也是弱群策略防错机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Journal of Mathematical Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信