Cephalometric changes of pushing splints 3 compared to rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy on the airway space in class III growing patients: A randomized clinical trial

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Angela Galeotti, Valeria Viarani, Lorenzo Franchi, Stefano Martina, Roberto Rongo, Vincenzo D'Antò, Roberto Uomo, Francesco Aristei, Paola Festa
{"title":"Cephalometric changes of pushing splints 3 compared to rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy on the airway space in class III growing patients: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Angela Galeotti,&nbsp;Valeria Viarani,&nbsp;Lorenzo Franchi,&nbsp;Stefano Martina,&nbsp;Roberto Rongo,&nbsp;Vincenzo D'Antò,&nbsp;Roberto Uomo,&nbsp;Francesco Aristei,&nbsp;Paola Festa","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Early orthopaedic treatment with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) associated with facemask (FM) has been shown to be effective in correcting Class III malocclusions in children. Treatment with pushing splints 3 (PS3) has shown to correct skeletal discrepancies in Class III growing patients. However, the effects of orthopaedic treatment on the upper airways in children with Class III malocclusion is controversial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric changes in the airways of PS3 compared to the RME/FM protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, 48 patients with Class III malocclusion (age range 5.5–8.5 years old) were selected for this study, and 24 were treated with PS3 appliance and 24 with RME/FM therapy. Lateral cephalograms before (T0) and at the end of the treatment (T1) were analysed to compare pharyngeal spaces. Paired and unpaired t tests were used for data analysis (<i>P</i> &lt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 41 patients (21 patients for the PS3 group, 11 males and 10 females, mean age 7.0 ± 1.2 years; 20 patients for the RME/FM group, 10 males and 10 females, mean age 7.2 ± 1.3 years) were included. The results showed a statistically significant (<i>P</i> &lt; .05) increase in the nasopharyngeal space after both therapies. However, the effects were similar considering that there were no differences between groups for the assessed variables at T0–T1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Early treatment of Class III malocclusion with PS3 does not induce a statistically significant increase in the sagittal airway space compared to RME/FM. The absence of untreated group could not define the role of growth in the increase of space.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12767","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early orthopaedic treatment with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) associated with facemask (FM) has been shown to be effective in correcting Class III malocclusions in children. Treatment with pushing splints 3 (PS3) has shown to correct skeletal discrepancies in Class III growing patients. However, the effects of orthopaedic treatment on the upper airways in children with Class III malocclusion is controversial.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric changes in the airways of PS3 compared to the RME/FM protocol.

Materials and Methods

In this study, 48 patients with Class III malocclusion (age range 5.5–8.5 years old) were selected for this study, and 24 were treated with PS3 appliance and 24 with RME/FM therapy. Lateral cephalograms before (T0) and at the end of the treatment (T1) were analysed to compare pharyngeal spaces. Paired and unpaired t tests were used for data analysis (P < .05).

Results

A total of 41 patients (21 patients for the PS3 group, 11 males and 10 females, mean age 7.0 ± 1.2 years; 20 patients for the RME/FM group, 10 males and 10 females, mean age 7.2 ± 1.3 years) were included. The results showed a statistically significant (P < .05) increase in the nasopharyngeal space after both therapies. However, the effects were similar considering that there were no differences between groups for the assessed variables at T0–T1.

Conclusions

Early treatment of Class III malocclusion with PS3 does not induce a statistically significant increase in the sagittal airway space compared to RME/FM. The absence of untreated group could not define the role of growth in the increase of space.

Abstract Image

推压夹板 3 与快速上颌扩张和面罩疗法相比对 III 类生长期患者气道空间的头颅测量变化:随机临床试验。
背景:事实证明,早期上颌快速扩弓(RME)配合面罩(FM)的矫形治疗可以有效矫正儿童的III类错颌畸形。推压夹板3(PS3)治疗已证明可以矫正III类生长期患者的骨骼差异。然而,矫形治疗对 III 类错牙合畸形儿童上呼吸道的影响还存在争议:本研究的目的是评估与RME/FM方案相比,PS3气道的头测量变化:本研究选择了48名III类错牙合畸形患者(年龄在5.5-8.5岁之间)作为研究对象,其中24名患者接受了PS3矫治器治疗,24名患者接受了RME/FM治疗。研究人员对治疗前(T0)和治疗结束时(T1)的侧头颅照片进行了分析,以比较咽部空间。数据分析采用配对和非配对 t 检验(P 结果:共纳入 41 名患者(PS3 组 21 名,男性 11 名,女性 10 名,平均年龄(7.0 ± 1.2)岁;RME/FM 组 20 名,男性 10 名,女性 10 名,平均年龄(7.2 ± 1.3)岁)。结果表明,RME/FM 组与 RME/FM 组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):与 RME/FM 相比,PS3 早期治疗 III 类错牙合畸形不会导致矢状面气道间隙有统计学意义的增加。未治疗组的缺失无法确定生长在空间增加中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信