Sex differences in laterality of motor unit firing behavior of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in strength-matched healthy young males and females.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05420-7
Yuichi Nishikawa, Kohei Watanabe, Aleš Holobar, Ryoka Kitamura, Noriaki Maeda, Allison S Hyngstrom
{"title":"Sex differences in laterality of motor unit firing behavior of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in strength-matched healthy young males and females.","authors":"Yuichi Nishikawa, Kohei Watanabe, Aleš Holobar, Ryoka Kitamura, Noriaki Maeda, Allison S Hyngstrom","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05420-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare laterality in motor unit firing behavior between females and males.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven subjects (14 females) were recruited for this study. The participants performed ramp up and hold isometric index finger abduction at 10, 30, and 60% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals were recorded in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and decomposed into individual motor unit (MU) firing behavior using a convolution blind source separation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 769 MUs were detected (females, n = 318 and males, n = 451). Females had a significantly higher discharge rate than males at each relative torque level (10%: male dominant hand, 13.4 ± 2.7 pps vs. female dominant hand, 16.3 ± 3.4 pps; 30%: male dominant hand, 16.1 ± 3.9 pps vs. female dominant hand, 20.0 ± 5.0 pps; and 60%: male dominant hand, 19.3 ± 3.8 vs. female dominant hand, 25.3 ± 4.8 pps; p < 0.0001). The recruitment threshold was also significantly higher in females than in males at 30 and 60% MVC. Furthermore, males exhibited asymmetrical discharge rates at 30 and 60% MVC and recruitment thresholds at 30 and 60% MVC, whereas no asymmetry was observed in females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the FDI muscle, compared to males, females exhibited different neuromuscular strategies with higher discharge rates and recruitment thresholds and no asymmetrical MU firing behavior. Notably, the findings that sex differences in neuromuscular activity also occur in healthy individuals provide important information for understanding the pathogenesis of various diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05420-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare laterality in motor unit firing behavior between females and males.

Methods: Twenty-seven subjects (14 females) were recruited for this study. The participants performed ramp up and hold isometric index finger abduction at 10, 30, and 60% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals were recorded in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and decomposed into individual motor unit (MU) firing behavior using a convolution blind source separation method.

Results: In total, 769 MUs were detected (females, n = 318 and males, n = 451). Females had a significantly higher discharge rate than males at each relative torque level (10%: male dominant hand, 13.4 ± 2.7 pps vs. female dominant hand, 16.3 ± 3.4 pps; 30%: male dominant hand, 16.1 ± 3.9 pps vs. female dominant hand, 20.0 ± 5.0 pps; and 60%: male dominant hand, 19.3 ± 3.8 vs. female dominant hand, 25.3 ± 4.8 pps; p < 0.0001). The recruitment threshold was also significantly higher in females than in males at 30 and 60% MVC. Furthermore, males exhibited asymmetrical discharge rates at 30 and 60% MVC and recruitment thresholds at 30 and 60% MVC, whereas no asymmetry was observed in females.

Conclusion: In the FDI muscle, compared to males, females exhibited different neuromuscular strategies with higher discharge rates and recruitment thresholds and no asymmetrical MU firing behavior. Notably, the findings that sex differences in neuromuscular activity also occur in healthy individuals provide important information for understanding the pathogenesis of various diseases.

Abstract Image

在力量匹配的健康年轻男性和女性中,第一背侧骨间肌运动单元点火行为的侧向性存在性别差异。
目的:本研究的目的是比较女性和男性运动单元发射行为的侧向性:本研究招募了 27 名受试者(14 名女性)。受试者分别以最大自主收缩量(MVC)的 10%、30% 和 60%进行了斜坡上升和保持等长食指外展运动。研究人员记录了第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)的高密度表面肌电图(HD-sEMG)信号,并使用卷积盲源分离法将其分解为单个运动单元(MU)的发射行为:共检测到 769 个运动单元(女性 318 个,男性 451 个)。在每个相对扭矩水平上,女性的放电率都明显高于男性(10%:男性优势手,13.4 ± 2.7 pps vs. 女性优势手,16.3 ± 3.4 pps;30%:男性优势手,16.1 ± 3.9 pps vs. 女性优势手,20.0 ± 5.0 pps;60%:男性优势手,19.3 ± 3.8 vs. 女性优势手,25.3 ± 4.8 pps;P 结论:在 FDI 肌肉中,与男性相比,女性的放电率明显高于男性(10%:男性优势手,13.4 ± 2.7 pps vs. 女性优势手,16.3 ± 3.4 pps;30%:男性优势手,16.1 ± 3.9 pps vs. 女性优势手,20.0 ± 5.0 pps):在 FDI 肌肉中,与男性相比,女性表现出不同的神经肌肉策略,具有更高的放电率和募集阈值,并且没有不对称的 MU 发火行为。值得注意的是,健康人的神经肌肉活动也存在性别差异,这一发现为了解各种疾病的发病机制提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信