Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Longhui Zhao , Meihua Zhang , Yuanyu Qin , Tongliang Wang , Xiaofei Zhai , Jianguo Cui , Jichao Wang
{"title":"Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog","authors":"Longhui Zhao ,&nbsp;Meihua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanyu Qin ,&nbsp;Tongliang Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Zhai ,&nbsp;Jianguo Cui ,&nbsp;Jichao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (<em>Amolops hainanensis</em>) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (<em>Amolops torrentis</em>), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was smaller than that of <em>A. torrentis</em>, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike <em>A. torrentis</em>, the tympanic membrane area of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of <em>A. hainanensis</em> and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. <em>A. hainanensis</em> (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than <em>A. torrentis</em> (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for <em>A. hainanensis</em>, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggest that the non-vocal <em>A. hainanensis</em> has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., <em>A. torrentis</em>), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"444 ","pages":"Article 108970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (Amolops hainanensis) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (Amolops torrentis), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of A. hainanensis was smaller than that of A. torrentis, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike A. torrentis, the tympanic membrane area of A. hainanensis was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of A. hainanensis and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for A. torrentis. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. A. hainanensis (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than A. torrentis (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for A. hainanensis, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for A. torrentis. Our results suggest that the non-vocal A. hainanensis has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., A. torrentis), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.

发声蛙和非发声蛙的听觉灵敏度和鼓膜中耳
鼓膜中耳对于有尾目动物在陆地上的听力非常重要。然而,许多物种已经部分或完全丧失了鼓膜。以前的研究曾比较过拥有和缺乏鼓膜的物种的听觉灵敏度,它们都能发出声音和进行声学交流。然而,人们对这些听觉能力与突变物种的听觉能力之间的可比性知之甚少。在这里,我们比较了两个来自嘈杂溪流栖息地的同胞物种,即 "不发声 "的海南激流蛙(Amolops hainanensis)和 "发声 "的小激流蛙(Amolops torrentis)的鼓膜和中耳解剖结构。我们的研究结果表明,海南蛙的耳膜直径(相对于头部大小)小于激流蛙,但绝对值并不小。与山洪蛙不同,海南蛙的鼓膜区域与周围皮肤没有明显区别。不过,这两个物种的中耳都很发达。我们测量了海南蛙的听觉脑干反应(ABRs),并将其ABR阈值和潜伏期与之前获得的激流蛙的ABR阈值和潜伏期进行了比较。我们的结果表明,这两个物种在听觉灵敏度方面存在显著差异。在较低频率下,海南蛙(相对鼓膜较小、不发声)比激流蛙(相对鼓膜较大、发声)具有更高的 ABR 阈值和更长的初始反应时间。在 800 Hz 到 7,000 Hz 之间的音调中,海南蛙的大脑神经生理反应达到峰值灵敏度,为 3,000 Hz(73 dB SPL),而洪流蛙则为 1,800 Hz(61 dB SPL)。我们的研究结果表明,不发声的海南蛙的听觉灵敏度低于其发声的姊妹物种(即激流蛙),这可能与鼓膜或内耳结构和形态的差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信