Seunghee Na, Dong Woo Kang, Geon Ha Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Yeshin Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Kee Hyung Park, Young Ho Park, Gihwan Byeon, Jeewon Suh, Joon Hyun Shin, YongSoo Shim, YoungSoon Yang, Yoo Hyun Um, Seong-Il Oh, Sheng-Min Wang, Bora Yoon, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Sun Min Lee, Juyoun Lee, Jin San Lee, Hak Young Rhee, Jae-Sung Lim, Young Hee Jung, Juhee Chin, Yun Jeong Hong, Hyemin Jang, Hongyoon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Jae-Won Jang
{"title":"The Usefulness of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia: The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Seunghee Na, Dong Woo Kang, Geon Ha Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Yeshin Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Kee Hyung Park, Young Ho Park, Gihwan Byeon, Jeewon Suh, Joon Hyun Shin, YongSoo Shim, YoungSoon Yang, Yoo Hyun Um, Seong-Il Oh, Sheng-Min Wang, Bora Yoon, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Sun Min Lee, Juyoun Lee, Jin San Lee, Hak Young Rhee, Jae-Sung Lim, Young Hee Jung, Juhee Chin, Yun Jeong Hong, Hyemin Jang, Hongyoon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Jae-Won Jang","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2024.23.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of <sup>18</sup>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the gold-standard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2024.23.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management.
Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the gold-standard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes.
Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments.
Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.