Immune endotyping and gene expression profile of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and the non-AERD subgroups.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Javad Nazari, Faezeh Shahba, Negin Jafariaghdam, Saleh Mohebbi, Saba Arshi, Mohammad Hassan Bemanian, Morteza Fallahpour, Sima Shokri, Fatemeh Atashrazm, Saeed Amini, Maryam Roomiani, Mahnaz Jamee, Pegah Babaheidarian, Majid Khoshmirsafa, Mohammad Nabavi
{"title":"Immune endotyping and gene expression profile of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and the non-AERD subgroups.","authors":"Javad Nazari, Faezeh Shahba, Negin Jafariaghdam, Saleh Mohebbi, Saba Arshi, Mohammad Hassan Bemanian, Morteza Fallahpour, Sima Shokri, Fatemeh Atashrazm, Saeed Amini, Maryam Roomiani, Mahnaz Jamee, Pegah Babaheidarian, Majid Khoshmirsafa, Mohammad Nabavi","doi":"10.1186/s13223-024-00876-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a paranasal sinus inflammatory disease and is divided into two subgroups defined as CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). CRSwNP displays a T helper (Th)2 biased phenotype, and based on sensitivity or tolerance to aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), is further subdivided into Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and non-AERD groups. Considering the challenge of diagnosis and treatment in patients with CRSwNP, particularly the AERD subtype, and the significance of endotyping in these patients, we examined the immune profile and endotyping based on gene expression analysis in the AERD and the non-AERD groups of patients with CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>In this study, 21 patients were enrolled and were categorized into AERD (N = 10) and non-AERD (N = 11) groups based on their sensitivity to aspirin. After the special washing period, nasal polyps were biopsied in both groups, and the infiltration of eosinophils, neutrophils, plasma cells, and lymphocytes was compared between the AERD and the non-AERD groups. Also, gene expression levels of transcription factors including Tbet, GATA3, RoRγt, and FoxP3 and inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)1β, IL1RAP (IL1 receptor accessory protein), IL2, IL4, IL5, IL10, IL13, IL17, TNFα, and IFNγ were investigated by quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Statistical analyses were performed using analytical tests including Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and T-test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± SD age of the studied groups was 37 ± 8.7 years old (21-50) for the AERD, and 40.4 ± 7.7 years old (31-52) for the non-AERD. LMS/EPOS/SNOT scores and pulmonary function tests showed no difference between the two groups. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were found to be higher in patients with AERD (p = 0.04), however, the peripheral blood counts of eosinophils were comparable in the two groups. In the histopathologic analysis, the AERD group showed higher percentages of eosinophils (p = 0.04), neutrophils (p = 0.04), and plasma cells (p = 0.04) than the non-AERD group. Additionally, the gene expression levels of GATA3 (p = 0.001), IL4 (p = 0.04), IL5 (p = 0.007), and IL17 (p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the AERD than the non-AERD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher gene expression levels of GATA3, IL4, IL5, and IL17 were observed in the AERD group compared with the non-AERD group. These findings point to distinct patterns of inflammation in patients with AERD, with a predominance of Th2 inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"20 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10870654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00876-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a paranasal sinus inflammatory disease and is divided into two subgroups defined as CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). CRSwNP displays a T helper (Th)2 biased phenotype, and based on sensitivity or tolerance to aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), is further subdivided into Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and non-AERD groups. Considering the challenge of diagnosis and treatment in patients with CRSwNP, particularly the AERD subtype, and the significance of endotyping in these patients, we examined the immune profile and endotyping based on gene expression analysis in the AERD and the non-AERD groups of patients with CRSwNP.

Material and method: In this study, 21 patients were enrolled and were categorized into AERD (N = 10) and non-AERD (N = 11) groups based on their sensitivity to aspirin. After the special washing period, nasal polyps were biopsied in both groups, and the infiltration of eosinophils, neutrophils, plasma cells, and lymphocytes was compared between the AERD and the non-AERD groups. Also, gene expression levels of transcription factors including Tbet, GATA3, RoRγt, and FoxP3 and inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)1β, IL1RAP (IL1 receptor accessory protein), IL2, IL4, IL5, IL10, IL13, IL17, TNFα, and IFNγ were investigated by quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Statistical analyses were performed using analytical tests including Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and T-test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean ± SD age of the studied groups was 37 ± 8.7 years old (21-50) for the AERD, and 40.4 ± 7.7 years old (31-52) for the non-AERD. LMS/EPOS/SNOT scores and pulmonary function tests showed no difference between the two groups. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were found to be higher in patients with AERD (p = 0.04), however, the peripheral blood counts of eosinophils were comparable in the two groups. In the histopathologic analysis, the AERD group showed higher percentages of eosinophils (p = 0.04), neutrophils (p = 0.04), and plasma cells (p = 0.04) than the non-AERD group. Additionally, the gene expression levels of GATA3 (p = 0.001), IL4 (p = 0.04), IL5 (p = 0.007), and IL17 (p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the AERD than the non-AERD groups.

Conclusion: Higher gene expression levels of GATA3, IL4, IL5, and IL17 were observed in the AERD group compared with the non-AERD group. These findings point to distinct patterns of inflammation in patients with AERD, with a predominance of Th2 inflammation.

阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病(AERD)亚组和非 AERD 亚组慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者的免疫内分型和基因表达谱。
背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种副鼻窦炎性疾病,分为两个亚组,即有鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)和无鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎(CRSsNP)。CRSwNP 显示出偏向 T 辅助细胞(Th)2 的表型,并根据对阿司匹林或非类固醇抗炎药(NSAID)的敏感性或耐受性,进一步细分为阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病(AERD)组和非 AERD 组。考虑到 CRSwNP 患者,尤其是 AERD 亚型患者的诊断和治疗难题,以及内分型在这些患者中的意义,我们基于基因表达分析研究了 CRSwNP 患者中 AERD 组和非 AERD 组的免疫特征和内分型:本研究共纳入 21 名患者,根据其对阿司匹林的敏感性将其分为 AERD 组(10 人)和非 AERD 组(11 人)。在特殊清洗期后,对两组患者的鼻息肉进行活检,比较 AERD 组和非 AERD 组嗜酸性粒细胞、中性粒细胞、浆细胞和淋巴细胞的浸润情况。此外,还通过实时定量 PCR(qRT-PCR)检测了转录因子(包括 Tbet、GATA3、RoRγt 和 FoxP3)和炎症细胞因子(包括白细胞介素(IL)1β、IL1RAP(IL1 受体附属蛋白)、IL2、IL4、IL5、IL10、IL13、IL17、TNFα 和 IFNγ)的基因表达水平。统计分析采用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov、Mann-Whitney 和 T 检验等分析测试。P值小于0.05为具有统计学意义:研究组的平均(±SD)年龄为:AERD(37±8.7)岁(21-50),非 AERD(40.4±7.7)岁(31-52)。两组患者的 LMS/EPOS/SNOT 评分和肺功能测试结果显示无差异。AERD患者的血清免疫球蛋白E(IgE)水平较高(P = 0.04),但两组患者的外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数相当。在组织病理学分析中,嗜酸性粒细胞增多症组的嗜酸性粒细胞(p = 0.04)、中性粒细胞(p = 0.04)和浆细胞(p = 0.04)的百分比高于非嗜酸性粒细胞增多症组。此外,AERD 组 GATA3(p = 0.001)、IL4(p = 0.04)、IL5(p = 0.007)和 IL17(p = 0.03)的基因表达水平显著高于非 AERD 组:结论:与非 AERD 组相比,AERD 组 GATA3、IL4、IL5 和 IL17 的基因表达水平更高。这些研究结果表明,AERD 患者的炎症模式与众不同,以 Th2 炎症为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信