Psychometrics of rating scales for externalizing disorders in Japanese outpatients: The ADHD-Rating Scale-5 and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale

IF 2.4 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1002/mpr.2015

Saeko Ishibashi, Takeshi Nishiyama, Takuya Makino, Futoshi Suzuki, Shoko Shimada, Shinji Tomari, Eiji Imanari, Takuma Higashi, Shintaro Fukumoto, Sawa Kurata, Yoshifumi Mizuno, Takeshi Morimoto, Hidetaka Nakamichi, Tomoko Iida, Kei Ohashi, Atsurou Yamada, Takuma Kimura, Yukiko Kuru, Satoshi Sumi, Yasuo Tanaka, Kazuya Ono, Hironobu Ichikawa, George J. DuPaul, Hirotaka Kosaka

{"title":"Psychometrics of rating scales for externalizing disorders in Japanese outpatients: The ADHD-Rating Scale-5 and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale","authors":"Saeko Ishibashi, Takeshi Nishiyama, Takuya Makino, Futoshi Suzuki, Shoko Shimada, Shinji Tomari, Eiji Imanari, Takuma Higashi, Shintaro Fukumoto, Sawa Kurata, Yoshifumi Mizuno, Takeshi Morimoto, Hidetaka Nakamichi, Tomoko Iida, Kei Ohashi, Atsurou Yamada, Takuma Kimura, Yukiko Kuru, Satoshi Sumi, Yasuo Tanaka, Kazuya Ono, Hironobu Ichikawa, George J. DuPaul, Hirotaka Kosaka","doi":"10.1002/mpr.2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study validated the Japanese version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale. We extended the ADHD-RS-5 by adding the oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder subscales to compare the two rating scales psychometrically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We examined the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of the two rating scales in 135 Japanese outpatients aged 6–18 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good for all the subscales of the two rating scales except for the conduct disorder subscale of the ADHD-RS-5 extended. Good construct validity was revealed by expected correlational patterns between subscales from the two rating scales and the Children Behavior Checklist. The criterion validity was good for all the subscales of the two rating scales rated by parents, while teacher-ratings revealed substantially lower predictive ability for all the subscales. Agreement between parent- and teacher-ratings of the two rating scales was generally moderate and using predictive ratings alone of both ratings showed the best predictive ability among the integration methods examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The two rating scales have sound psychometric properties and will aid in screening and severity assessment of externalizing disorders in Japanese clinical settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mpr.2015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.2015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study validated the Japanese version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale. We extended the ADHD-RS-5 by adding the oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder subscales to compare the two rating scales psychometrically.

Methods

We examined the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of the two rating scales in 135 Japanese outpatients aged 6–18 years.

Results

The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good for all the subscales of the two rating scales except for the conduct disorder subscale of the ADHD-RS-5 extended. Good construct validity was revealed by expected correlational patterns between subscales from the two rating scales and the Children Behavior Checklist. The criterion validity was good for all the subscales of the two rating scales rated by parents, while teacher-ratings revealed substantially lower predictive ability for all the subscales. Agreement between parent- and teacher-ratings of the two rating scales was generally moderate and using predictive ratings alone of both ratings showed the best predictive ability among the integration methods examined.

Conclusion

The two rating scales have sound psychometric properties and will aid in screening and severity assessment of externalizing disorders in Japanese clinical settings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

日本门诊患者外化障碍评定量表的心理测量学：多动症评级量表-5》和《破坏性行为障碍评级量表》。

研究目的本研究对日文版注意力缺陷/多动障碍评定量表-5（ADHD-RS-5）和破坏性行为障碍评定量表进行了验证。我们对 ADHD-RS-5 进行了扩展，增加了对立违抗障碍和行为障碍两个分量表，对两个评定量表进行了心理计量学上的比较：方法：我们以 135 名 6-18 岁的日本门诊患者为研究对象，考察了两个评定量表的内部一致性、重测信度、建构效度和标准效度：结果：除 ADHD-RS-5 扩展版的行为障碍分量表外，两个评定量表所有分量表的内部一致性和重测信度均良好。两个评定量表的分量表与儿童行为检查表之间的预期相关模式显示了良好的建构效度。由家长评定的两个分级量表的所有分量表都具有良好的标准效度，而由教师评定的两个分级量表的所有分量表都具有较低的预测能力。家长和教师对两个评分量表的评分之间的一致性一般为中等，在所研究的整合方法中，仅使用两个评分量表的预测性评分显示出最好的预测能力：这两个评分量表具有良好的心理测量特性，有助于在日本临床环境中筛查和评估外化障碍的严重程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.