Preparedness for severe maternal morbidity in European hospitals: The MaCriCare study

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Paweł Krawczyk , Dominika Dabrowska , Emilia Guasch , Henrik Jörnvall , Nuala Lucas , Frédéric J. Mercier , Alexandra Schyns-van den Berg , Carolyn F. Weiniger , Łukasz Balcerzak , Steve Cantellow , MaCriCare study group
{"title":"Preparedness for severe maternal morbidity in European hospitals: The MaCriCare study","authors":"Paweł Krawczyk ,&nbsp;Dominika Dabrowska ,&nbsp;Emilia Guasch ,&nbsp;Henrik Jörnvall ,&nbsp;Nuala Lucas ,&nbsp;Frédéric J. Mercier ,&nbsp;Alexandra Schyns-van den Berg ,&nbsp;Carolyn F. Weiniger ,&nbsp;Łukasz Balcerzak ,&nbsp;Steve Cantellow ,&nbsp;MaCriCare study group","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate obstetric units (OUs) and intensive care units (ICUs) preparedness for severe maternal morbidity (SMM).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From September 2021 to January 2022, an international multicentre cross-sectional study surveyed OUs in 26 WHO Europe Region countries. We assessed modified early obstetric warning score usage (MEOWS), approaches to four SMM clinical scenarios, invasive monitoring availability in OUs, and access to high-dependency units (HDUs) and onsite ICUs. Within ICUs, we examined the availability of trained staff, response to obstetric emergencies, leadership, and data collection.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1133 responses were evaluated. MEOWS use was 34.5%. Non-obstetric early warning scores were being used. 21.4% (242) of OUs provided invasive monitoring in the OU. A quarter lacked access to onsite HDU beds. In cases of SMM, up to 13.8% of all OUs indicated the need for transfer to another hospital. The transfer rate was highest (74.0%) in small units. 81.9% of centers provided onsite ICU facilities to obstetric patients. Over 90% of the onsite ICUs provided daily specialist obstetric reviews but lacked immediate access to key resources: 3.4% - uterotonic drugs, 7.5% - neonatal resuscitation equipment, 9.2% - neonatal resuscitation team, 11.4% - perimortem cesarean section equipment. 41.2% reported obstetric data to a national database.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Gaps in provision exist for obstetric patients with SMM in Europe, potentially compromising patient safety and experience. MEOWS use in OUs was low, while access to invasive monitoring and onsite HDU and ICU facilities was variable. ICUs frequently lacked resources and did not universally collect obstetric data for quality control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000134/pdfft?md5=dc552f36e50d87e79224dab2cb82243b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352556824000134-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate obstetric units (OUs) and intensive care units (ICUs) preparedness for severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

Methods

From September 2021 to January 2022, an international multicentre cross-sectional study surveyed OUs in 26 WHO Europe Region countries. We assessed modified early obstetric warning score usage (MEOWS), approaches to four SMM clinical scenarios, invasive monitoring availability in OUs, and access to high-dependency units (HDUs) and onsite ICUs. Within ICUs, we examined the availability of trained staff, response to obstetric emergencies, leadership, and data collection.

Results

1133 responses were evaluated. MEOWS use was 34.5%. Non-obstetric early warning scores were being used. 21.4% (242) of OUs provided invasive monitoring in the OU. A quarter lacked access to onsite HDU beds. In cases of SMM, up to 13.8% of all OUs indicated the need for transfer to another hospital. The transfer rate was highest (74.0%) in small units. 81.9% of centers provided onsite ICU facilities to obstetric patients. Over 90% of the onsite ICUs provided daily specialist obstetric reviews but lacked immediate access to key resources: 3.4% - uterotonic drugs, 7.5% - neonatal resuscitation equipment, 9.2% - neonatal resuscitation team, 11.4% - perimortem cesarean section equipment. 41.2% reported obstetric data to a national database.

Conclusion

Gaps in provision exist for obstetric patients with SMM in Europe, potentially compromising patient safety and experience. MEOWS use in OUs was low, while access to invasive monitoring and onsite HDU and ICU facilities was variable. ICUs frequently lacked resources and did not universally collect obstetric data for quality control.

欧洲医院应对严重产妇发病率的准备工作:MaCriCare 研究。
目的:评估产科病房(OUs)和重症监护病房(ICUs)对严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)的准备情况:方法:2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 1 月,一项国际多中心横断面研究对世界卫生组织欧洲地区 26 个国家的产科病房进行了调查。我们评估了修改后的产科预警评分(MEOWS)的使用情况、四种 SMM 临床情景的处理方法、产科手术室的侵入性监测可用性以及高危病房(HDU)和现场重症监护室的使用情况。在重症监护室,我们考察了训练有素的工作人员的可用性、产科紧急情况的应对措施、领导能力和数据收集情况:结果:共评估了 1133 份回复。MEOWS的使用率为34.5%。非产科预警评分的使用率为 34.5%。21.4%(242 个)的手术室在手术室内提供侵入性监测。1/4的手术单位无法使用现场加护病房床位。在 SMM 病例中,高达 13.8%的手术室表示需要转院。小型病房的转院率最高(74.0%)。81.9%的中心为产科病人提供现场重症监护室设施。90%以上的现场重症监护室提供每日产科专家复查,但无法立即获得关键资源:3.4%的重症监护室没有子宫收缩药物,7.5%没有新生儿复苏设备,9.2%没有新生儿复苏团队,11.4%没有剖宫产设备。41.2% 向国家数据库报告产科数据:结论:欧洲在为SMM产科病人提供设备方面存在差距,可能会影响病人的安全和体验。MEOWS在产科病房的使用率很低,而获得侵入性监测以及现场HDU和ICU设施的情况各不相同。重症监护室经常缺乏资源,也没有普遍收集产科数据以进行质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信