Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Nasrin Abulhasanbeigi Gallehzan, Majid Khosravi, Khosro Jamebozorgi, Nazanin Mir, Habib Jalilian, Samira Soleimanpour, Saeed Hoseini, Aziz Rezapour, Abbas Eshraghi
{"title":"Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Nasrin Abulhasanbeigi Gallehzan, Majid Khosravi, Khosro Jamebozorgi, Nazanin Mir, Habib Jalilian, Samira Soleimanpour, Saeed Hoseini, Aziz Rezapour, Abbas Eshraghi","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00478-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease. The economic burden of MS is substantial, and the high cost of Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) prices are the main drivers of healthcare expenditures. We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The search covered articles published between May 2001 and May 2023. Studies that were written in English and Persian and examined the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs in patients with MS were included in our review. Data extraction was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). All costs were converted to 2020 U.S. dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1589 studies, and 49 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were mainly based on a European setting. Most studies employed Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness. The lowest and highest numerical value of outcome measures were -1,623,918 and 2,297,141.53, respectively. Furthermore, the lowest and highest numerical value of the cost of DMDs of RRMS were $180.67, and $1474840.19, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of all studies, it can be concluded that for the treatment of patients with MS, care-oriented strategies should be preferred to drug strategies. Also, among the drug strategies with different prescribing methods, oral disease-modifying drugs of RRMS should be preferred to injectable drugs and intravenous infusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10870486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00478-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease. The economic burden of MS is substantial, and the high cost of Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) prices are the main drivers of healthcare expenditures. We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Materials and method: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The search covered articles published between May 2001 and May 2023. Studies that were written in English and Persian and examined the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs in patients with MS were included in our review. Data extraction was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). All costs were converted to 2020 U.S. dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).

Results: The search yielded 1589 studies, and 49 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were mainly based on a European setting. Most studies employed Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness. The lowest and highest numerical value of outcome measures were -1,623,918 and 2,297,141.53, respectively. Furthermore, the lowest and highest numerical value of the cost of DMDs of RRMS were $180.67, and $1474840.19, respectively.

Conclusions: Based on the results of all studies, it can be concluded that for the treatment of patients with MS, care-oriented strategies should be preferred to drug strategies. Also, among the drug strategies with different prescribing methods, oral disease-modifying drugs of RRMS should be preferred to injectable drugs and intravenous infusions.

复发缓解型多发性硬化症病情改变药物的成本效用和成本效益分析:系统综述。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)是一种慢性、自身免疫性和炎症性疾病。多发性硬化症造成了巨大的经济负担,而改变病情药物(DMDs)的高昂价格是医疗支出的主要驱动因素。我们对评估治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的 DMDs 的成本效用和成本效益的研究进行了系统综述:在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Embase 中进行了检索。搜索范围包括 2001 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月间发表的文章。以英语和波斯语撰写的研究以及对多发性硬化症患者使用 DMDs 的成本效用和成本效益进行的研究均被纳入我们的综述。数据提取以《卫生经济学评估综合报告标准》(CHEERS)核对表为指导,经济学评估的质量采用《卫生经济学研究质量工具》(QHES)进行评估。所有成本均采用购买力平价(PPP)换算成 2020 年美元:结果:搜索结果显示共有 1589 项研究,其中 49 项符合纳入条件。这些研究主要基于欧洲环境。大多数研究采用马尔可夫模型评估成本效益。结果测量的最低和最高数值分别为-1,623,918 和 2,297,141.53。此外,RRMS 的 DMDs 成本最低值和最高值分别为 180.67 美元和 1474840.19 美元:根据所有研究的结果,可以得出结论:对于多发性硬化症患者的治疗,护理策略应优于药物策略。同时,在不同处方方法的药物策略中,RRMS 的口服改变病情药物应优于注射药物和静脉输液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信