The quest for psychological symmetry through figural goodness, randomness, and complexity: A selective review.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695241226545
Daniel Fitousi, Daniel Algom
{"title":"The quest for psychological symmetry through figural goodness, randomness, and complexity: A selective review.","authors":"Daniel Fitousi, Daniel Algom","doi":"10.1177/20416695241226545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of the four interrelated concepts in the title, only symmetry has an exact mathematical definition. In mathematical development, symmetry is a graded variable-in marked contrast with the popular binary conception of symmetry in and out of the laboratory (i.e. an object is either symmetrical or nonsymmetrical). Because the notion does not have a direct graded perceptual counterpart (experimental participants are not asked about the amount of symmetry of an object), students of symmetry have taken various detours to characterize the perceptual effects of symmetry. Current approaches have been informed by information theory, mathematical group theory, randomness research, and complexity. Apart from reviewing the development of the main approaches, for the first time we calculated associations between figural goodness as measured in the Garner tradition and measures of algorithmic complexity and randomness developed in recent research. We offer novel ideas and analyses by way of integrating the various approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"15 1","pages":"20416695241226545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695241226545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Of the four interrelated concepts in the title, only symmetry has an exact mathematical definition. In mathematical development, symmetry is a graded variable-in marked contrast with the popular binary conception of symmetry in and out of the laboratory (i.e. an object is either symmetrical or nonsymmetrical). Because the notion does not have a direct graded perceptual counterpart (experimental participants are not asked about the amount of symmetry of an object), students of symmetry have taken various detours to characterize the perceptual effects of symmetry. Current approaches have been informed by information theory, mathematical group theory, randomness research, and complexity. Apart from reviewing the development of the main approaches, for the first time we calculated associations between figural goodness as measured in the Garner tradition and measures of algorithmic complexity and randomness developed in recent research. We offer novel ideas and analyses by way of integrating the various approaches.

通过形象美、随机性和复杂性寻求心理对称:选择性回顾。
在标题中四个相互关联的概念中,只有对称有确切的数学定义。在数学发展中,对称是一个分级变量,这与实验室内外流行的二元对称概念(即一个物体要么对称要么不对称)形成了鲜明对比。由于这一概念没有直接的分级感知对应物(实验参与者不会被问及物体的对称程度),研究对称性的学生在描述对称性的感知效果时走了很多弯路。信息论、数学群论、随机性研究和复杂性都为当前的研究方法提供了参考。除了回顾主要方法的发展历程外,我们还首次计算了按照加纳传统衡量的形象美感与近期研究中开发的算法复杂性和随机性衡量标准之间的关联。通过整合各种方法,我们提出了新颖的观点和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信