The latest steps of human evolution: What the hard evidence has to say about it?

Walter Neves , Maria Helena Senger , Gabriel Rocha , Leticia Valota , Mark Hubbe
{"title":"The latest steps of human evolution: What the hard evidence has to say about it?","authors":"Walter Neves ,&nbsp;Maria Helena Senger ,&nbsp;Gabriel Rocha ,&nbsp;Leticia Valota ,&nbsp;Mark Hubbe","doi":"10.1016/j.qeh.2024.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The latest periods of human evolution are a heated topic of debate and have been at the center of paleoanthropological discussions since the beginning of the field. In the last twenty years, new excavations increased the geographic range of paleoanthropological data, new fossil hominins of the last third of the Pleistocene were found, and old key fossils were redated by modern and more accurate methods. The new picture emerging from this research changed the discussion about the neandertal-<em>sapiens</em> interaction, the finding of their common ancestor, and the understanding of how our lineage evolved. To integrate these new discoveries and to better contextualize how they fit in the hominin framework of the Chibanian, we compared the cranial morphology of 86 well-preserved fossils from Europe, Africa, and Asia of the last 500 thousand years. 25 linear measurements were used to describe the cranial morphology of the fossils, and their biological affinities were explored though multivariate discriminant function analyses. These analyses allow us to assess affinities and possible phylogenetic relationships of Archaic <em>Homo</em> species, including the expressive morphological variability of the specimens included under the umbrella-term “<em>Homo heidelbergensis”</em> from Africa, Asia, and Europe. Our results support that cannot be accommodated in one same species. Additionally, we contribute to the disputable discussion about the origin of <em>H. sapiens</em>, adding support to an African origin for our species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101053,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236524000033/pdfft?md5=a54c8aac3df50647e0472daf8cd97c8e&pid=1-s2.0-S2950236524000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236524000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest periods of human evolution are a heated topic of debate and have been at the center of paleoanthropological discussions since the beginning of the field. In the last twenty years, new excavations increased the geographic range of paleoanthropological data, new fossil hominins of the last third of the Pleistocene were found, and old key fossils were redated by modern and more accurate methods. The new picture emerging from this research changed the discussion about the neandertal-sapiens interaction, the finding of their common ancestor, and the understanding of how our lineage evolved. To integrate these new discoveries and to better contextualize how they fit in the hominin framework of the Chibanian, we compared the cranial morphology of 86 well-preserved fossils from Europe, Africa, and Asia of the last 500 thousand years. 25 linear measurements were used to describe the cranial morphology of the fossils, and their biological affinities were explored though multivariate discriminant function analyses. These analyses allow us to assess affinities and possible phylogenetic relationships of Archaic Homo species, including the expressive morphological variability of the specimens included under the umbrella-term “Homo heidelbergensis” from Africa, Asia, and Europe. Our results support that cannot be accommodated in one same species. Additionally, we contribute to the disputable discussion about the origin of H. sapiens, adding support to an African origin for our species.

人类进化的最新进展:确凿证据说明了什么?
人类进化的最近时期是一个激烈争论的话题,自古人类学诞生以来一直是该领域讨论的中心。在过去的二十年里,新的发掘工作扩大了古人类学数据的地理范围,发现了更新世最后三分之一时期的新人类化石,并用更准确的现代方法对旧的关键化石进行了重新定年。这项研究揭示的新情况改变了人们对新白垩世人与智人之间互动关系的讨论,改变了人们对他们共同祖先的发现,也改变了人们对人类如何进化的理解。为了整合这些新发现,并更好地将它们纳入奇班人的类人猿框架,我们比较了过去 50 万年中来自欧洲、非洲和亚洲的 86 具保存完好的化石的头盖骨形态。我们使用了 25 种线性测量方法来描述这些化石的颅骨形态,并通过多元判别函数分析来探讨它们的生物亲缘关系。通过这些分析,我们可以评估古智人物种的亲缘关系和可能的系统发育关系,包括非洲、亚洲和欧洲 "海德堡智人 "总称下标本的形态变异性。我们的研究结果表明,海德堡智人不能归入同一物种。此外,我们还为关于智人起源的争议性讨论做出了贡献,为我们的物种起源于非洲提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信