Barriers to and Facilitators of Delabelling of Antimicrobial Allergies: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3490
Juliana Mann, Victoria Cox, Sean Gorman, Piera Calissi
{"title":"Barriers to and Facilitators of Delabelling of Antimicrobial Allergies: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis.","authors":"Juliana Mann, Victoria Cox, Sean Gorman, Piera Calissi","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who report penicillin allergies may receive alternative antibiotics. Such substitution contributes to antimicrobial resistance, lower treatment efficacy, increased frequency of adverse events, and increased costs. Approximately 90% of individuals who report a penicillin allergy can tolerate a penicillin.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the barriers to and facilitators of removal by health care workers of inaccurate antimicrobial allergies from patient records, known as delabelling.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The MEDLINE database was searched from inception to December 29, 2020.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>Qualitative studies evaluating health care professionals' perceptions of barriers to and/or facilitators of the act of delabelling a patient's antimicrobial allergies were included in the meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to code and group individual utterances from the included studies, which were mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel and corresponding intervention function and policy categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight themes were identified as representing barriers to delabelling: delabelling skills, patient education skills, knowledge, electronic health records (EHRs), communication frameworks, time, fear about allergic reactions, and professional roles. Behaviour change interventions that may overcome these barriers include education, training, algorithms and toolkits, changes to EHRs, use of dedicated personnel, policies, incentivization of correct labelling, and an audit system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eight themes were identified as barriers to delabelling of antimicrobial allergies. Future behaviour change interventions to address these barriers were proposed. Confidence in the findings of this study was judged to be moderate, according to the GRADE CERQual approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10846797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients who report penicillin allergies may receive alternative antibiotics. Such substitution contributes to antimicrobial resistance, lower treatment efficacy, increased frequency of adverse events, and increased costs. Approximately 90% of individuals who report a penicillin allergy can tolerate a penicillin.

Objective: To identify the barriers to and facilitators of removal by health care workers of inaccurate antimicrobial allergies from patient records, known as delabelling.

Data sources: The MEDLINE database was searched from inception to December 29, 2020.

Study selection and data extraction: Qualitative studies evaluating health care professionals' perceptions of barriers to and/or facilitators of the act of delabelling a patient's antimicrobial allergies were included in the meta-synthesis.

Data synthesis: The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to code and group individual utterances from the included studies, which were mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel and corresponding intervention function and policy categories.

Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight themes were identified as representing barriers to delabelling: delabelling skills, patient education skills, knowledge, electronic health records (EHRs), communication frameworks, time, fear about allergic reactions, and professional roles. Behaviour change interventions that may overcome these barriers include education, training, algorithms and toolkits, changes to EHRs, use of dedicated personnel, policies, incentivization of correct labelling, and an audit system.

Conclusions: Eight themes were identified as barriers to delabelling of antimicrobial allergies. Future behaviour change interventions to address these barriers were proposed. Confidence in the findings of this study was judged to be moderate, according to the GRADE CERQual approach.

消除抗菌药过敏标签的障碍和促进因素:定性元综合。
背景:对青霉素过敏的患者可能会使用其他抗生素。这种替代品会导致抗菌药耐药性、治疗效果降低、不良反应增加以及成本增加。大约 90% 的青霉素过敏者可以耐受青霉素:目的:确定医护人员从患者病历中删除不准确的抗菌药物过敏信息(即脱标签)的障碍和促进因素:研究选择和数据提取:荟萃综述中纳入了评估医护人员对患者抗菌药物过敏去标签这一行为的障碍和/或促进因素的看法的定性研究:数据综合:采用理论领域框架对纳入研究中的个人言论进行编码和分组,并将其映射到 "行为改变轮 "以及相应的干预功能和政策类别中:结果:四项研究符合纳入标准。结果:有四项研究符合纳入标准,其中八项主题代表了脱敏的障碍:脱敏技能、患者教育技能、知识、电子健康记录(EHR)、沟通框架、时间、对过敏反应的恐惧以及专业角色。可克服这些障碍的行为改变干预措施包括教育、培训、算法和工具包、更改电子病历、使用专职人员、政策、激励正确贴标以及审计系统:结论:有八个主题被认为是阻碍抗菌药过敏标签除名的因素。针对这些障碍提出了未来的行为改变干预措施。根据 GRADE CERQual 方法,本研究结果的可信度为中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信