Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation With High-Definition tDCS on Upper Limb Function in Hemiparetic Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1177/15459683241233259
Li Bian, Li Zhang, Guilan Huang, Da Song, Kai Zheng, Xinlei Xu, Wenjun Dai, Caili Ren, Ying Shen
{"title":"Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation With High-Definition tDCS on Upper Limb Function in Hemiparetic Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Li Bian, Li Zhang, Guilan Huang, Da Song, Kai Zheng, Xinlei Xu, Wenjun Dai, Caili Ren, Ying Shen","doi":"10.1177/15459683241233259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preconditioning with cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) can potentiate cortical plasticity induced by intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and enhance the after-effects of iTBS in healthy people. However, it is unclear whether this multi-modal protocol can enhance upper limb function in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate whether priming iTBS with cathodal HD-tDCS over the ipsilesional M1 can augment upper limb motor recovery in poststroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 66 patients with subacute stroke were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Group 1 received priming iTBS with HD-tDCS (referred to as the tDCS + iTBS group), Group 2 received non-priming iTBS (the iTBS group), and Group 3 received sham stimulation applied to the ipsilesional M1. One session was performed per day, 5 days per week, for 3 consecutive weeks. In Group 1, iTBS was preceded by a 20-minute session of cathodal HD-tDCS at a 10-minute interval. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score. Moreover, the secondary outcome measures for muscle strength and spasticity were the Motricity Index-Upper Extremity (MI-UE) and the Modified Ashworth Scale Upper-Extremity (MAS-UE), respectively, and the Hong Kong Version of the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE-HK) and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) for activity and participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were detected in the changes in FMA-UE, MI-UE, and MBI scores between the 3 groups from baseline to post-intervention (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>FMA-UE</sub> = 10.856, <i>P</i> = .004; χ<sup>2</sup><sub>MI-UE</sub> = 6.783, <i>P</i> = .034; χ<sup>2</sup><sub>MBI</sub> = 9.608, <i>P</i> = .008). Post hoc comparisons revealed that the priming iTBS group demonstrated substantial improvements in FMA-UE (<i>P</i> = .004), MI-UE (<i>P</i> = .028), and MBI (<i>P</i> = 0.006) compared with those in the sham group. However, no significant difference was observed between the iTBS group and the sham group. Moreover, no significant differences were found in the changes in MAS-UE or FTHUE-HK between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Priming iTBS with HD-tDCS over the ipsilesional M1 cortex had beneficial effects on augmenting upper limb motor recovery and enhancing daily participation among subacute stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"268-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241233259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preconditioning with cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) can potentiate cortical plasticity induced by intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and enhance the after-effects of iTBS in healthy people. However, it is unclear whether this multi-modal protocol can enhance upper limb function in patients with stroke.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether priming iTBS with cathodal HD-tDCS over the ipsilesional M1 can augment upper limb motor recovery in poststroke patients.

Methods: A total of 66 patients with subacute stroke were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Group 1 received priming iTBS with HD-tDCS (referred to as the tDCS + iTBS group), Group 2 received non-priming iTBS (the iTBS group), and Group 3 received sham stimulation applied to the ipsilesional M1. One session was performed per day, 5 days per week, for 3 consecutive weeks. In Group 1, iTBS was preceded by a 20-minute session of cathodal HD-tDCS at a 10-minute interval. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score. Moreover, the secondary outcome measures for muscle strength and spasticity were the Motricity Index-Upper Extremity (MI-UE) and the Modified Ashworth Scale Upper-Extremity (MAS-UE), respectively, and the Hong Kong Version of the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE-HK) and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) for activity and participation.

Results: Significant differences were detected in the changes in FMA-UE, MI-UE, and MBI scores between the 3 groups from baseline to post-intervention (χ2FMA-UE = 10.856, P = .004; χ2MI-UE = 6.783, P = .034; χ2MBI = 9.608, P = .008). Post hoc comparisons revealed that the priming iTBS group demonstrated substantial improvements in FMA-UE (P = .004), MI-UE (P = .028), and MBI (P = 0.006) compared with those in the sham group. However, no significant difference was observed between the iTBS group and the sham group. Moreover, no significant differences were found in the changes in MAS-UE or FTHUE-HK between the groups.

Conclusions: Priming iTBS with HD-tDCS over the ipsilesional M1 cortex had beneficial effects on augmenting upper limb motor recovery and enhancing daily participation among subacute stroke patients.

用高清 tDCS 对脑卒中偏瘫患者的上肢功能进行间歇性 Theta 脉冲刺激的效果:随机对照研究
背景:阴极高清晰度经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)预处理可增强间歇性θ脉冲刺激(iTBS)诱导的皮质可塑性,并增强健康人iTBS的后效应。然而,这种多模式方案能否增强中风患者的上肢功能尚不清楚:本研究的目的是探讨在 iTBS 的基础上对同侧 M1 进行阴极 HD-tDCS 能否促进脑卒中后患者的上肢运动恢复:方法:将66名亚急性脑卒中患者随机分为3组。方法:66 名亚急性中风患者被随机分为 3 组,第一组接受带有 HD-tDCS 的引物 iTBS(称为 tDCS + iTBS 组),第二组接受非引物 iTBS(iTBS 组),第三组接受应用于同侧 M1 的假刺激。每天一次,每周 5 天,连续 3 周。在第 1 组中,iTBS 之前先进行 20 分钟的阴极 HD-tDCS 刺激,每次间隔 10 分钟。主要疗效指标为 Fugl-Meyer 评估-上肢(FMA-UE)评分。此外,肌力和痉挛的次要结局指标分别是运动指数-上肢(MI-UE)和改良阿什沃斯量表-上肢(MAS-UE),活动和参与的次要结局指标是香港版偏瘫上肢功能测试(FTHUE-HK)和改良巴特尔指数(MBI):三组患者的 FMA-UE、MI-UE 和 MBI 分数从基线到干预后的变化存在显著差异(χ2FMA-UE = 10.856,P = .004;χ2MI-UE = 6.783,P = .034;χ2MBI = 9.608,P = .008)。事后比较显示,与假体组相比,引物 iTBS 组的 FMA-UE (P = .004)、MI-UE (P = .028) 和 MBI (P = 0.006) 均有显著改善。然而,iTBS 组与假体组之间没有观察到明显差异。此外,各组之间的 MAS-UE 或 FTHUE-HK 变化也无明显差异:结论:在M1皮层同侧进行iTBS和HD-tDCS引物对促进亚急性卒中患者的上肢运动恢复和日常参与具有有益的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信