Effect of direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran on early bone healing: An experimental study in rats.

Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry Pub Date : 2023-11-07 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.34172/japid.2023.020
Ioanna Kyriakaki, Theodora Karanikola, Theodoros Lillis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Nikolaos Dabarakis
{"title":"Effect of direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran on early bone healing: An experimental study in rats.","authors":"Ioanna Kyriakaki, Theodora Karanikola, Theodoros Lillis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Nikolaos Dabarakis","doi":"10.34172/japid.2023.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dabigatran belongs to the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Its advantages are oral administration and no need for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Although its use has increased, its potential side effects on bone healing and remodeling have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of dabigatran on early bone healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; in group A, 20-mg/kg dabigatran dose was administered orally daily for 15 days, while group B served as a control. Two circular bone defects (d=6 mm) were created on either side of the parietal bones. Two weeks after surgery and euthanasia of the animals, tissue samples (parietal bones that contained the defects) were harvested for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of α=0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the regenerated bone (21.9% vs. 16.3%, <i>P</i>=0.172) or the percentage of bone bridging (63.3% vs. 53.5%, <i>P</i>=0.401).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dabigatran did not affect bone regeneration, suggesting that it might be a safer drug compared to older anticoagulants known to lead to bone healing delay.</p>","PeriodicalId":73584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","volume":"15 2","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2023.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dabigatran belongs to the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Its advantages are oral administration and no need for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Although its use has increased, its potential side effects on bone healing and remodeling have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of dabigatran on early bone healing.

Methods: Sixteen male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; in group A, 20-mg/kg dabigatran dose was administered orally daily for 15 days, while group B served as a control. Two circular bone defects (d=6 mm) were created on either side of the parietal bones. Two weeks after surgery and euthanasia of the animals, tissue samples (parietal bones that contained the defects) were harvested for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of α=0.5.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the regenerated bone (21.9% vs. 16.3%, P=0.172) or the percentage of bone bridging (63.3% vs. 53.5%, P=0.401).

Conclusion: Dabigatran did not affect bone regeneration, suggesting that it might be a safer drug compared to older anticoagulants known to lead to bone healing delay.

直接口服抗凝剂达比加群对早期骨愈合的影响:大鼠实验研究
背景:达比加群属于新一代直接口服抗凝血剂(DOACs):达比加群属于新一代直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)。其优点是口服给药,无需监测国际正常化比率(INR)。虽然其使用量有所增加,但其对骨愈合和重塑的潜在副作用尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估达比加群对早期骨愈合可能产生的影响:将 16 只雄性 Wistar 大鼠分为两组,A 组每天口服 20 毫克/千克达比加群达 15 天,B 组为对照组。两组大鼠顶骨两侧各有一个圆形骨缺损(d=6 毫米)。手术两周后安乐死动物,采集组织样本(包含缺损的顶骨)进行组织学和组织形态计量学分析。统计分析的显著性水平为 α=0.5:结果:两组之间在再生骨(21.9% vs. 16.3%,P=0.172)或骨桥接百分比(63.3% vs. 53.5%,P=0.401)方面无统计学差异:结论:达比加群不影响骨再生,这表明与已知会导致骨愈合延迟的老式抗凝药物相比,达比加群可能是一种更安全的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信