Methyl-11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning for recurrent malignant glioma

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hikaru Niitsu, Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu, Keiichi Tanaka, Masashi Mizumoto, Kei Nakai, Masahide Matsuda, Eiichi Ishikawa, Kentaro Hatano, Tsuyoshi Hashimoto, Satoshi Kamizawa, Hideyuki Sakurai
{"title":"Methyl-11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning for recurrent malignant glioma","authors":"Hikaru Niitsu,&nbsp;Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu,&nbsp;Keiichi Tanaka,&nbsp;Masashi Mizumoto,&nbsp;Kei Nakai,&nbsp;Masahide Matsuda,&nbsp;Eiichi Ishikawa,&nbsp;Kentaro Hatano,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Hashimoto,&nbsp;Satoshi Kamizawa,&nbsp;Hideyuki Sakurai","doi":"10.1007/s12149-024-01901-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate differences in uptake regions between methyl-<sup>11</sup>C-L-methionine positron emission tomography (<sup>11</sup>C-MET PET) and gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their impact on dose distribution, including changing of the threshold for tumor boundaries.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty consecutive patients with grade 3 or 4 glioma who had recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy (RT) between April 2016 and October 2017 were examined. The study was performed using simulation with the assumption that all patients received RT. The clinical target volume (CTV) was contoured using the Gd-enhanced region (CTV(Gd)), the tumor/normal tissue (T/N) ratios of <sup>11</sup>C-MET PET of 1.3 and 2.0 (CTV (T/N 1.3), CTV (T/N 2.0)), and the PET-edge method (CTV(P-E)) for stereotactic RT planning. Differences among CTVs were evaluated. The brain dose at each CTV and the dose at each CTV defined by <sup>11</sup>C-MET PET using MRI as the reference were evaluated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The Jaccard index (JI) for concordance of CTV (Gd) with CTVs using <sup>11</sup>C-MET PET was highest for CTV (T/N 2.0), with a value of 0.7. In a comparison of pixel values of MRI and PET, the correlation coefficient for cases with higher JI was significantly greater than that for lower JI cases (0.37 vs. 0.20, <i>P</i> = 0.007). D50% of the brain in RT planning using each CTV differed significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.03) and that using CTV (T/N 1.3) were higher than with use of CTV (Gd). V90% and V95% for each CTV differed in a simulation study for actual treatment using CTV (Gd) (<i>P</i> = 1.0 × 10<sup>–7</sup> and 3.0 × 10<sup>–9</sup>, respectively) and those using CTV (T/N 1.3) and CTV (P-E) were lower than with CTV (Gd).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The region of <sup>11</sup>C-MET accumulation is not necessarily consistent with and larger than the Gd-enhanced region. A change of the tumor boundary using <sup>11</sup>C-MET PET can cause significant changes in doses to the brain and the CTV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"38 4","pages":"305 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-024-01901-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate differences in uptake regions between methyl-11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography (11C-MET PET) and gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their impact on dose distribution, including changing of the threshold for tumor boundaries.

Methods

Twenty consecutive patients with grade 3 or 4 glioma who had recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy (RT) between April 2016 and October 2017 were examined. The study was performed using simulation with the assumption that all patients received RT. The clinical target volume (CTV) was contoured using the Gd-enhanced region (CTV(Gd)), the tumor/normal tissue (T/N) ratios of 11C-MET PET of 1.3 and 2.0 (CTV (T/N 1.3), CTV (T/N 2.0)), and the PET-edge method (CTV(P-E)) for stereotactic RT planning. Differences among CTVs were evaluated. The brain dose at each CTV and the dose at each CTV defined by 11C-MET PET using MRI as the reference were evaluated.

Results

The Jaccard index (JI) for concordance of CTV (Gd) with CTVs using 11C-MET PET was highest for CTV (T/N 2.0), with a value of 0.7. In a comparison of pixel values of MRI and PET, the correlation coefficient for cases with higher JI was significantly greater than that for lower JI cases (0.37 vs. 0.20, P = 0.007). D50% of the brain in RT planning using each CTV differed significantly (P = 0.03) and that using CTV (T/N 1.3) were higher than with use of CTV (Gd). V90% and V95% for each CTV differed in a simulation study for actual treatment using CTV (Gd) (P = 1.0 × 10–7 and 3.0 × 10–9, respectively) and those using CTV (T/N 1.3) and CTV (P-E) were lower than with CTV (Gd).

Conclusions

The region of 11C-MET accumulation is not necessarily consistent with and larger than the Gd-enhanced region. A change of the tumor boundary using 11C-MET PET can cause significant changes in doses to the brain and the CTV.

Abstract Image

甲基-11C-L-蛋氨酸正电子发射断层扫描用于复发性恶性胶质瘤的放疗计划。
目的研究甲基-11C-L-蛋氨酸正电子发射断层扫描(11C-MET PET)和钆(Gd)增强磁共振成像(MRI)摄取区域的差异及其对剂量分布的影响,包括肿瘤边界阈值的变化:研究对象为2016年4月至2017年10月期间连续接受术后放疗(RT)后复发的20例3级或4级胶质瘤患者。研究采用模拟法进行,假设所有患者都接受了 RT。使用钆增强区域(CTV(Gd))、11C-MET PET 的肿瘤/正常组织(T/N)比值 1.3 和 2.0(CTV (T/N 1.3), CTV (T/N 2.0))以及 PET 边缘法(CTV(P-E))绘制了临床靶体积(CTV)轮廓,用于立体定向 RT 规划。评估了不同 CTV 之间的差异。评估了每个 CTV 的脑剂量和以核磁共振成像为参考的 11C-MET PET 定义的每个 CTV 的剂量:用 11C-MET PET 测量 CTV (Gd) 与 CTV 的一致性时,CTV(T/N 2.0)的 Jaccard 指数(JI)最高,为 0.7。在核磁共振成像和 PET 的像素值比较中,JI 较高病例的相关系数明显高于 JI 较低病例(0.37 对 0.20,P = 0.007)。在使用每种 CTV 进行 RT 规划时,大脑的 D50% 有明显差异(P = 0.03),使用 CTV(T/N 1.3)的 D50% 比使用 CTV(Gd)的 D50% 高。在使用CTV(Gd)进行实际治疗的模拟研究中,各CTV的V90%和V95%存在差异(P = 1.0 × 10-7和3.0 × 10-9),使用CTV(T/N 1.3)和CTV(P-E)的V90%和V95%低于使用CTV(Gd)的V90%和V95%:结论:11C-MET聚集区不一定与Gd增强区一致,也不一定大于Gd增强区。使用 11C-MET PET 改变肿瘤边界可导致大脑和 CTV 剂量的显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信