Santiago Espinosa-Salas , Leila Bagherzadeh , Q. Eileen Wafford , Graeme Witte , Thomas J. Schnitzer
{"title":"Does sex affect the efficacy of systemic pharmacological treatments of pain in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review","authors":"Santiago Espinosa-Salas , Leila Bagherzadeh , Q. Eileen Wafford , Graeme Witte , Thomas J. Schnitzer","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether sex influences the analgesic efficacy of systemic pharmacological treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A systematic review, guided by Cochrane methods, sourced studies from Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text as of October 10, 2022. Eligible studies were double-blind RCTs evaluating systemic pharmacological treatments for knee osteoarthritis in adults, with minimum 30-day treatment duration, reporting sex-specific results or mentioning sex subgroup analysis for analgesic efficacy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 (RoB 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>9 studies (5201 participants) met inclusion criteria, analyzing drugs including duloxetine, etoricoxib, tapentadol, naproxcinod, lutikizumab, and rofecoxib. Only one study reported sex-specific results. Review findings suggested no significant sex-based differences in treatment efficacy, however, data were limited due to a lack of sex-specific reporting or inclusion of sex in subgroup analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Current evidence does not support the existence of sex differences in the analgesic efficacy of systemic knee osteoarthritis treatments. However, this conclusion is substantially limited by the paucity of sex-specific reporting of results or subgroup analyses in most primary studies, emphasizing the need for future research to report on sex-stratified data to allow for comprehensive, personalized treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000050/pdfft?md5=f67a9f929d0ef976fa4b3560782ef35e&pid=1-s2.0-S2665913124000050-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine whether sex influences the analgesic efficacy of systemic pharmacological treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Design
A systematic review, guided by Cochrane methods, sourced studies from Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text as of October 10, 2022. Eligible studies were double-blind RCTs evaluating systemic pharmacological treatments for knee osteoarthritis in adults, with minimum 30-day treatment duration, reporting sex-specific results or mentioning sex subgroup analysis for analgesic efficacy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 (RoB 2).
Results
9 studies (5201 participants) met inclusion criteria, analyzing drugs including duloxetine, etoricoxib, tapentadol, naproxcinod, lutikizumab, and rofecoxib. Only one study reported sex-specific results. Review findings suggested no significant sex-based differences in treatment efficacy, however, data were limited due to a lack of sex-specific reporting or inclusion of sex in subgroup analyses.
Conclusions
Current evidence does not support the existence of sex differences in the analgesic efficacy of systemic knee osteoarthritis treatments. However, this conclusion is substantially limited by the paucity of sex-specific reporting of results or subgroup analyses in most primary studies, emphasizing the need for future research to report on sex-stratified data to allow for comprehensive, personalized treatment strategies.