The Consequences of Social Inequality for the Health and Development of India's Children: The Case of Caste, Sanitation, and Child Height.

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Social Justice Research Pub Date : 2019-09-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s11211-019-00323-x
Melissa LoPalo, Diane Coffey, Dean Spears
{"title":"The Consequences of Social Inequality for the Health and Development of India's Children: The Case of Caste, Sanitation, and Child Height.","authors":"Melissa LoPalo, Diane Coffey, Dean Spears","doi":"10.1007/s11211-019-00323-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The links among social inequality, economic inequality, and health have long been of interest to social scientists, but causal links are difficult to investigate empirically. In particular, studies examining the impact of social status on one's own health may overlook important effects of inequality on the health of populations as a whole occurring due to negative externalities of social forces. A recent literature on caste, sanitation, and child net nutrition provides an example of one social context where social inequality makes an entire population less healthy. This paper presents new observational analysis of the India Human Development Survey that provides descriptive evidence of this mechanism. We show that, on average, children in rural India are shorter if they live in villages where more people report practicing untouchability-meaning that they enforce caste hierarchies in their interactions with people from the lowest castes. This association is explained by the association between casteism and the prevalence of rural open defecation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47602,"journal":{"name":"Social Justice Research","volume":"32 3","pages":"239-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10861996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Justice Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00323-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The links among social inequality, economic inequality, and health have long been of interest to social scientists, but causal links are difficult to investigate empirically. In particular, studies examining the impact of social status on one's own health may overlook important effects of inequality on the health of populations as a whole occurring due to negative externalities of social forces. A recent literature on caste, sanitation, and child net nutrition provides an example of one social context where social inequality makes an entire population less healthy. This paper presents new observational analysis of the India Human Development Survey that provides descriptive evidence of this mechanism. We show that, on average, children in rural India are shorter if they live in villages where more people report practicing untouchability-meaning that they enforce caste hierarchies in their interactions with people from the lowest castes. This association is explained by the association between casteism and the prevalence of rural open defecation.

社会不平等对印度儿童健康和发展的影响:种姓、卫生和儿童身高的案例》。
社会不平等、经济不平等和健康之间的联系长期以来一直是社会科学家关注的问题,但因果联系却很难进行实证研究。特别是,研究社会地位对个人健康的影响时,可能会忽略社会力量的负外部性所导致的不平等对整个人口健康的重要影响。最近一篇关于种姓、卫生和儿童净营养的文献提供了一个社会不平等使整个人口健康状况下降的社会背景实例。本文对印度人类发展调查进行了新的观察分析,为这一机制提供了描述性证据。我们的研究表明,如果印度农村地区有更多的人声称自己是贱民--这意味着他们在与最低种姓的人交往时执行种姓等级制度--那么他们的孩子平均身高就会更矮。种姓制度与农村随地大小便的普遍性之间的关联可以解释这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Social Justice Research, is an international multidisciplinary forum for the publication of original papers that have broad implications for social scientists investigating the origins, structures, and consequences of justice in human affairs. The journal encompasses the justice-related work (using traditional and novel approaches) of all social scientists-psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, economists, policy scientists, political scientists, legal researchers, management scientists, and others. Its multidisciplinary approach furthers the integration of the various social science perspectives. In addition to original research papers - theoretical, empirical, and methodological - the journal also publishes book reviews and, from time to time, special thematic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信