Additional nodules detected using EOB-MRI in patients with resectable single hepatocellular carcinoma: an implication for active treatment strategy.

Journal of liver cancer Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.17998/jlc.2024.01.25
Na Reum Kim, Seoung Yoon Rho, Jonathan Navarro, Chansik An, Dai Hoon Han, Jin Sub Choi, Myeong-Jin Kim, Gi Hong Choi
{"title":"Additional nodules detected using EOB-MRI in patients with resectable single hepatocellular carcinoma: an implication for active treatment strategy.","authors":"Na Reum Kim, Seoung Yoon Rho, Jonathan Navarro, Chansik An, Dai Hoon Han, Jin Sub Choi, Myeong-Jin Kim, Gi Hong Choi","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2024.01.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOBMRI) further enhances the identification of additional hepatic nodules compared with computed tomography (CT) alone; however, the optimal treatment for such additional nodules remains unclear. We investigated the long-term oncological effect of aggressive treatment strategies for additional lesions identified using EOB-MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 522 patients diagnosed with solitary HCC using CT between January 2008 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare the oncologic outcomes between patients with solitary HCC and those with additional nodules on EOB-MRI after aggressive treatment (resection or radiofrequency ablation [RFA]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 383 patients included, 59 had additional nodules identified using EOB-MRI. Compared with patients with solitary HCC, those with additional nodules on EOB-MRI had elevated total bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase; had a lower platelet count, higher MELD score, and highly associated with liver cirrhosis (P<0.05). Regarding long-term outcomes, 59 patients with solitary HCC and those with additional nodules after PSM were compared. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable between the two groups (DFS, 60.4 vs. 44.3 months, P=0.071; OS, 82.8 vs. 84.8 months, P=0.986).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aggressive treatment approach, either resection or RFA, for patients with additional nodules identified on EOBMRI was associated with long-term survival comparable with that for solitary HCC. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver cancer","volume":" ","pages":"92-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of liver cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2024.01.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOBMRI) further enhances the identification of additional hepatic nodules compared with computed tomography (CT) alone; however, the optimal treatment for such additional nodules remains unclear. We investigated the long-term oncological effect of aggressive treatment strategies for additional lesions identified using EOB-MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Data from 522 patients diagnosed with solitary HCC using CT between January 2008 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare the oncologic outcomes between patients with solitary HCC and those with additional nodules on EOB-MRI after aggressive treatment (resection or radiofrequency ablation [RFA]).

Results: Among the 383 patients included, 59 had additional nodules identified using EOB-MRI. Compared with patients with solitary HCC, those with additional nodules on EOB-MRI had elevated total bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase; had a lower platelet count, higher MELD score, and highly associated with liver cirrhosis (P<0.05). Regarding long-term outcomes, 59 patients with solitary HCC and those with additional nodules after PSM were compared. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable between the two groups (DFS, 60.4 vs. 44.3 months, P=0.071; OS, 82.8 vs. 84.8 months, P=0.986).

Conclusion: The aggressive treatment approach, either resection or RFA, for patients with additional nodules identified on EOBMRI was associated with long-term survival comparable with that for solitary HCC. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.

使用 EOB-MRI 在可切除的单发肝细胞癌患者中检测到额外结节:对积极治疗策略的启示。
导言:与单纯的计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,钆-乙氧基苄基-二乙烯三胺五醋酸增强磁共振成像(EOB-MRI)可进一步增强对肝脏额外结节的识别;然而,对这些额外结节的最佳治疗方法仍不明确。我们研究了对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者使用 EOB-MRI 发现的额外病灶采取积极治疗策略的长期肿瘤学效果:我们回顾性研究了2008年1月至2012年12月期间使用计算机断层扫描(CT)确诊的522例单发HCC患者的数据。结果:在纳入的383名患者中,有59名患者在积极治疗(切除或射频消融(RFA))后出现结节:在纳入的 383 例患者中,有 59 例通过 EOB-MRI 发现了额外的结节。与单发 HCC 患者相比,EOB-MRI 检查发现有额外结节的患者总胆红素、天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶升高;血小板计数降低;MELD 评分升高;与肝硬化高度相关(P < 0.05)。在长期预后方面,59 位单发 HCC 患者与 PSM 后出现额外结节的患者进行了比较。两组患者的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)相当(DFS,60.4 个月 vs. 44.3 个月,P = 0.071;OS,82.8 个月 vs. 84.8 个月,P = 0.986):结论:对 EOB-MRI 发现有额外结节的患者采取积极的治疗方法(切除或 RFA),其长期生存率与单发 HCC 相当。然而,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信