A randomized controlled trial of a digital cognitive-behavioral therapy program (COMPASS) for managing depression and anxiety related to living with a long-term physical health condition.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1017/S0033291723003756
Federica Picariello, Katrin Hulme, Natasha Seaton, Joanna L Hudson, Sam Norton, Abigail Wroe, Rona Moss-Morris
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of a digital cognitive-behavioral therapy program (COMPASS) for managing depression and anxiety related to living with a long-term physical health condition.","authors":"Federica Picariello, Katrin Hulme, Natasha Seaton, Joanna L Hudson, Sam Norton, Abigail Wroe, Rona Moss-Morris","doi":"10.1017/S0033291723003756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of COMPASS, a therapist-supported digital therapeutic for reducing psychological distress (anxiety/depression) in people living with long-term physical health conditions (LTCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-armed randomized-controlled trial recruiting from LTC charities. Participants with anxiety and/or depression symptoms related to their LTC(s) were randomized (concealed allocation via independent administrator) to COMPASS (access to 11 tailored modules plus five thirty-minute therapist support sessions) or standard charity support (SCS). Assessments were completed online pre-randomization, at 6- and 12-weeks post-randomization. Primary outcome was Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale; PHQ-ADS measured at 12-weeks. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles with adjusted mean differences estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Data-analyst was blinded to group allocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 participants were randomized to COMPASS (<i>N</i> = 94) or SCS (<i>N</i> = 100). At 12-weeks, mean level of psychological distress was 6.82 (95% confidence interval; CI 4.55-9.10) points lower (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the COMPASS arm compared with SCS (standardized mean difference of 0.71 (95% CI 0.48-0.95)). The COMPASS arm also showed moderate significant treatment effects on secondary outcomes including depression, anxiety and illness-related distress and small significant effects on functioning and quality-of-life. Rates of adverse events were comparable across the arms. Deterioration in distress at 12-weeks was observed in 2.2% of the SCS arm, and no participants in the COMPASS arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with SCS, COMPASS digital therapeutic with minimal therapist input reduces psychological distress at post-treatment (12-weeks). COMPASS offers a potentially scalable implementation model for health services but its translation to these contexts needs further evaluating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04535778.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723003756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of COMPASS, a therapist-supported digital therapeutic for reducing psychological distress (anxiety/depression) in people living with long-term physical health conditions (LTCs).

Methods: A two-armed randomized-controlled trial recruiting from LTC charities. Participants with anxiety and/or depression symptoms related to their LTC(s) were randomized (concealed allocation via independent administrator) to COMPASS (access to 11 tailored modules plus five thirty-minute therapist support sessions) or standard charity support (SCS). Assessments were completed online pre-randomization, at 6- and 12-weeks post-randomization. Primary outcome was Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale; PHQ-ADS measured at 12-weeks. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles with adjusted mean differences estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Data-analyst was blinded to group allocation.

Results: 194 participants were randomized to COMPASS (N = 94) or SCS (N = 100). At 12-weeks, mean level of psychological distress was 6.82 (95% confidence interval; CI 4.55-9.10) points lower (p < 0.001) in the COMPASS arm compared with SCS (standardized mean difference of 0.71 (95% CI 0.48-0.95)). The COMPASS arm also showed moderate significant treatment effects on secondary outcomes including depression, anxiety and illness-related distress and small significant effects on functioning and quality-of-life. Rates of adverse events were comparable across the arms. Deterioration in distress at 12-weeks was observed in 2.2% of the SCS arm, and no participants in the COMPASS arm.

Conclusion: Compared with SCS, COMPASS digital therapeutic with minimal therapist input reduces psychological distress at post-treatment (12-weeks). COMPASS offers a potentially scalable implementation model for health services but its translation to these contexts needs further evaluating.

Trial registration: NCT04535778.

数字认知行为疗法项目(COMPASS)的随机对照试验,用于控制与长期身体健康状况相关的抑郁和焦虑。
背景:评估 COMPASS 的临床疗效:目的:评估 COMPASS 的临床疗效。COMPASS 是一种由治疗师提供支持的数字疗法,用于减轻长期身体健康状况不佳(LTCs)患者的心理压力(焦虑/抑郁):方法:一项双臂随机对照试验,从长期护理中心慈善机构招募人员。有焦虑和/或抑郁症状的长寿者被随机分配到 COMPASS(11 个定制模块和 5 次 30 分钟的治疗师支持课程)或标准慈善支持(SCS)(通过独立管理员进行隐蔽分配)。评估在随机前、随机后 6 周和 12 周在线完成。主要结果是患者健康问卷焦虑和抑郁量表;PHQ-ADS 在 12 周时进行测量。分析采用意向治疗原则,使用线性混合效应模型估算调整后的平均差异。数据分析师对组别分配保持盲法:194名参与者被随机分配到COMPASS(94人)或SCS(100人)组。12周时,COMPASS组的平均心理压力水平比SCS组低6.82分(95%置信区间;CI为4.55-9.10)(p < 0.001)(标准化平均差异为0.71(95% CI为0.48-0.95))。COMPASS 治疗组对抑郁、焦虑和疾病相关痛苦等次要结果也有中等程度的显著治疗效果,对功能和生活质量也有小幅显著效果。各治疗组的不良反应发生率相当。在12周时,SCS治疗组有2.2%的患者出现了窘迫感恶化,而COMPASS治疗组没有患者出现窘迫感恶化:结论:与 SCS 相比,COMPASS 数字疗法只需极少的治疗师投入,就能减少治疗后(12 周)的心理压力。COMPASS为医疗服务提供了一种潜在的可扩展实施模式,但其在这些环境中的应用还需要进一步评估:试验注册:NCT04535778。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信