Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and their combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against MRSA isolates: a two center study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1080/1120009X.2024.2316539
Hasan Cenk Mirza, Özlem Öğüç Şanlı
{"title":"Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and their combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against MRSA isolates: a two center study.","authors":"Hasan Cenk Mirza, Özlem Öğüç Şanlı","doi":"10.1080/1120009X.2024.2316539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an increasing need for new synergistic antimicrobial combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Our objective was to evaluate the activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and their combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) isolates recovered at two centers in Turkey. Activities of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were tested against 100 MRSA isolates using gradient diffusion method. Activities of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole in combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against 20 selected isolates (including all isolates that were non-susceptible to ceftaroline or ceftobiprole, and randomly selected isolates) were investigated using MIC:MIC ratio method. Antimicrobial interactions were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The MIC<sub>50</sub>/MIC<sub>90</sub> values for ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were 0.75/1 and 1/1.5 mg/L, respectively. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole susceptibility rates among 100 MRSA isolates were 94% and 96%, respectively. Ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole MICs of isolates were not increased when ceftaroline or ceftobiprole was combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Ceftobiprole- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated additivity against 35%, whereas ceftaroline- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated additivity against 10% of 20 MRSA isolates. The remaining interactions for MRSA isolates were indifference. Three (75%) of four ceftobiprole-resistant isolates became susceptible to ceftobiprole after adding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. None of the ceftaroline non-susceptible isolates became susceptible to ceftaroline after adding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Ceftobiprole- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination may be a better treatment option than ceftaroline- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination for MRSA infections. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the results of our <i>in vitro</i> study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"457-464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1120009X.2024.2316539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increasing need for new synergistic antimicrobial combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Our objective was to evaluate the activity of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and their combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered at two centers in Turkey. Activities of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were tested against 100 MRSA isolates using gradient diffusion method. Activities of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole in combination with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against 20 selected isolates (including all isolates that were non-susceptible to ceftaroline or ceftobiprole, and randomly selected isolates) were investigated using MIC:MIC ratio method. Antimicrobial interactions were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The MIC50/MIC90 values for ceftaroline and ceftobiprole were 0.75/1 and 1/1.5 mg/L, respectively. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole susceptibility rates among 100 MRSA isolates were 94% and 96%, respectively. Ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole MICs of isolates were not increased when ceftaroline or ceftobiprole was combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Ceftobiprole- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated additivity against 35%, whereas ceftaroline- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination demonstrated additivity against 10% of 20 MRSA isolates. The remaining interactions for MRSA isolates were indifference. Three (75%) of four ceftobiprole-resistant isolates became susceptible to ceftobiprole after adding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. None of the ceftaroline non-susceptible isolates became susceptible to ceftaroline after adding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Ceftobiprole- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination may be a better treatment option than ceftaroline- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole combination for MRSA infections. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the results of our in vitro study.

评估头孢他啶、头孢比普及其与三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑复方制剂对 MRSA 分离物的体外活性:一项双中心研究。
现在越来越需要新的协同抗菌组合来对抗耐多药细菌。我们的目的是评估头孢他啶、头孢比普乐及其与三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑的复方制剂对土耳其两个中心回收的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)分离株的活性。采用梯度扩散法测试了头孢他啶和头孢比普洛尔对 100 株 MRSA 分离物的活性。采用 MIC:MIC 比值法研究了头孢他啶和头孢比普乐与三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑联用对 20 个选定分离株(包括对头孢他啶或头孢比普乐不敏感的所有分离株和随机选定的分离株)的活性。使用分数抑菌浓度(FIC)指数解释抗菌相互作用。头孢他啶和头孢比普洛的 MIC50/MIC90 值分别为 0.75/1 和 1/1.5 mg/L。在 100 个 MRSA 分离物中,头孢他啶和头孢比普乐的敏感率分别为 94% 和 96%。头孢他啶或头孢比普乐与三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑合用时,分离菌的头孢他啶、头孢比普乐和三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑 MICs 不会增加。头孢比普乐-三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑复方制剂对 35% 的 MRSA 分离物具有加成作用,而头孢他啶-三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑复方制剂对 20 个 MRSA 分离物中的 10% 具有加成作用。其余的相互作用对 MRSA 分离物的影响不大。在四种头孢噻吩耐药的分离物中,有三种(75%)在加入三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑后变得对头孢噻吩敏感。在加入三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑后,对头孢他啶不敏感的分离株中没有一个对头孢他啶敏感。与头孢他啶-三甲双胍/磺胺甲恶唑复方制剂相比,头孢比丙醇-三甲双胍/磺胺甲恶唑复方制剂可能是治疗 MRSA 感染的更好选择。要证实我们的体外研究结果,还需要进行临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemotherapy
Journal of Chemotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemotherapy is an international multidisciplinary journal committed to the rapid publication of high quality, peer-reviewed, original research on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The Journal publishes original experimental and clinical research articles, state-of-the-art reviews, brief communications and letters on all aspects of chemotherapy, providing coverage of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control of infection, as well as the use of anticancer and immunomodulating drugs. Specific areas of focus include, but are not limited to: · Antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic, and antiprotozoal agents; · Anticancer classical and targeted chemotherapeutic agents, biological agents, hormonal drugs, immunomodulatory drugs, cell therapy and gene therapy; · Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of antimicrobial and anticancer agents; · The efficacy, safety and toxicology profiles of antimicrobial and anticancer drugs; · Drug interactions in single or combined applications; · Drug resistance to antimicrobial and anticancer drugs; · Research and development of novel antimicrobial and anticancer drugs, including preclinical, translational and clinical research; · Biomarkers of sensitivity and/or resistance for antimicrobial and anticancer drugs; · Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics; · Precision medicine in infectious disease therapy and in cancer therapy; · Pharmacoeconomics of antimicrobial and anticancer therapies and the implications to patients, health services, and the pharmaceutical industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信